Try telling that to people who are having sexual intercourse.
Determine what sexual intercourse does not exist look it up. If you find a common use of that phrase please provide it.
Homosexuality is an attraction or sexual orientation. That orientation could never lead to intercourse because intercourse must happen between people of the opposite sex. If you look up homosexual behavior you will not see the term intercourse use terms like mutual masturbation.
Could you explain how your comments on sexual assault has anything to do with their discussion on how judges of change the meaning of the words in the constitution as your previous quote stated. Could you explain that for me please?
I would also like to know why you referred me to that article when the quote I pulled out of that article disagrees with your premise that the supreme court justices did not change the meaning of the constitution when, your quote says they did by their changing the meaning of words I interpreting them differently then the people that wrote them.
Could you explain why you chose that quote and how it supports your argument?