@aperson,
What is/are facepalms?
I'm not at all defensive about this - in my opinion anyone can name their child anything they want.
Should they maybe think of what the impact might be on that child - yes - but who's to say they didn't or don't -even if they pick a name you or I don't like. Maybe they really did think, 'I'd really have loved to have been named Blanket myself- it makes me feel so warm and cuddly and I want my child to feel the same way,' or 'When I think of Paris, I think of eternity and light - I'm bestowing those gifts upon my child with this name.'
I mean - I would name my kid Aanisah or Paris before I'd name her Harriet or Mildred (which are both considered to be more 'normal' names).
Quote:
Like someone's sig (is it Farmerman? I can't remember) says, you can't reason with someone whose beliefs aren't intially arrived at by reason.
Well, that doesn't appeal to me, because that's assuming there's only one acceptable reason or version of reason. Everyone arrives at whatever belief they arrive at for a reason. It may not be your reason or my reason or anyone else's reason - but it's still a reason.
I don't believe in any indisputable generic one-size-fits-all carved in stone reason (except when it comes to mathematics).
I am totally neutral on this- I just know that I can't tell anyone else what to believe is normal or pretty. They have their own ideas about that. And unless someone is just a sadist - they really are naming their child what they find to be beautiful or meaningful to them- no matter how it might sound to anyone else.