@oralloy,
Quote:The actual physical evidence shows that Trayvon was 100% the aggressor.
Just to be clear - the physical evidence shows only that Zimmerman lost of the fight. It does not show who the instigator / agressor was. Being attacked and being able defend yourself from attack while throwing a better punch, does not make the person throwing a better punch the agressor. Even ending up on top, particularly if you have rolled around a couple of times, does not make you the agressor.
--------------------------------
As for your nonsense claims regarding the Coopers. A vague threat is
always subjective, and
always requires context to understand. For example, you'll get whats coming to you, can easily mean:
- Karma will get you
- "I'm going to sue you for everything"
- you'll be on social media and condemned by everyone
- I'm going to kill you
- etc
...only context, including the nature of the person saying the thing, can help interpret such a vague 'threat', as to its meaning, and even if it is a 'threat' (ie. not a 'karma will get you', and not a unlawful threat - like I'm going to sue you, or a non violent threat - ie, I'm posting your behaviour on instagram).
The nature of Christian Cooper was:
- lawful (asking her to leash her dog)
- calm
- sounded somewhat bemused
- no moves towards her
- videoing (people with the above behaviour do not do this in order to attack or threaten another)
Your biased interpretation of events...where you admit to ignorning context (including the nature/behaviour of the person) in order to reach your conclusions...of a vague threat...your ignoring of anything that does not support your congemnations of the black guy...coupled with a history of favouring the white persons side....You even said she would have been justified shooting him. ...show just how racist you are in this area.
In these types of situations, you have no interest in justice, which accounts for all contributing circumstances. You have no interest in fairness...which accounts for all contributing circumstances an perceptions. You have no interest in truth, which looks at and acknowledges all angles of an incident. You claims that these are what is important to you are just fables made up by yourself, and largely only for yourself - your own posts show this, and no-one else seems to buy your claims (at least in these types of posts. I've seen others were you are articulate and consistent with the evidence).