@snood,
snood wrote:Your ilk can probably bog everyone down with semantics and get away with it, but it doesn't affect some simple truths.
Facts are semantics?
snood wrote:An assault rifle is by definition capable of firing in automatic mode.
Correct.
snood wrote:Semi automatic rifles are assault weapons. The operative word is assault.
The ability to fire large quantities of bullets as fast as you can pull a trigger is not something that was developed for sports or hunting though it can be used that way. The capability was developed for killing large numbers of people accurately and quickly. It was developed because of the needs of the soldier in combat.
Thus "military style assault weapon".
That is incorrect. Assault weapons:
a) are capable of either full-auto or burst-fire
b) accept detachable magazines
c) fire rounds that are less powerful than a standard deer rifle, and
d) are effective at a range of 300 meters.
This means that semi-auto-only guns are not assault weapons.
This means that guns with fixed magazines are not assault weapons.
This means that guns that fire rounds equal-to or greater-than the power of a standard deer rifle are not assault weapons.
This means that guns that fire handgun/shotgun/rimfire rounds are not assault weapons.
snood wrote:The only people who try to act like this is nebulous are you and your ilk.
We are not acting like anything is even remotely nebulous. When you refer to a gun using the wrong terminology, you are flat out wrong.
snood wrote:Just like everyone but dedicated perverts understand porn when they see it, everyone but deranged gun nuts understands what an assault weapon is when another mass shooter uses one.
No assault weapon has ever been used in a mass shooting in the US.
Assault weapons have been very tightly regulated for the past 85 years, and people are not allowed to own them unless they were manufactured and registered more than 33 years ago.