@hawkeye10,
Quote:I any case I have no opinion in what to do about domestic violence, nor have I voiced an opinion.
This is a lie.
The title of this thread is "Should we retool our response to intimate violence?" The title of the article you linked is "Teenage Girls Stand by Their Man." Therefore, the title of this thread is inferentially your opinion--by inference, you suggest that society's response to what you are pleased to describe as "intimate violence" (as though there were a variety of violence which is strictly a private matter and not a matter of concern for society) ought to be reconsidered. That is not any part of the article, and it therefore cannot be anyone's opinion but your own. This paragraph:
Quote:It is not just teens BTW, increasingly often adult women are refusing to deal with sexual trespass and violence in their relationships because they believe that all efforts to address the problem will result in unreasonable punishment of their mates. The teen response to the beating that Rihanna took does however bring up the question of just how badly has overreaching by the anti abuse lobby damaged long term attempts to work on the problem of intimate violence. Young people don't seem to take as serious the claim that violence in relationship equals abuse. Those who were successful in strengthening the laws and policing of relationship violence may have won the battle but lost the war, as winning would require passing down to the next generation the opinion about violence that the leaders of the generation currently in power have agreed to. (emphasis added)
. . . does not appear in the article, and can only be your own addition to the topic. Once again, by inference, you are suggesting that society's response to domestic violence ought to be reconsidered. Therefore, any claim that you have not "voiced" your opinion is bullshit.
Quote:This subject has nothing to do with me, saying as set does that the question is irrelevant because someone whom he does not like and who does not agree with him on the current state of sex law is the act of burying ones head in the sand.
I did not state or imply that the question is irrelevant, i addressed the question directly by pointing out that the sample referred to (the data from Boston quoted in the linked article) comes from children, and that they are confused in their responses. Fifty-one percent blamed him, 46% blamed her, and 52% blamed them both--in case math is not your strong suit, that adds up to 149%. Since all responses in a survey can only add up to 100%, it is clear to anyone but the incredibly thick, or the wilfully disingenuous, that some respondents blamed both him
and them both, and that some respondents blamed both her
and them both, and that therefore, the responses indicate that many of the respondents were confused about responsibilty in this incident. I also pointed out that the people responding are all children. With an age range from 12 to 19 (which means everyone up to one day short of 20 years of age), that's an eight year span, with 75% of the ages being legally children, and the remaining 25% very likely children in terms of their personal maturity. I included in my response your well-known objection to the concept of marital rape and your opposition to age of consent laws--because you did express an opinion, and it is part and parcel with your other attitudes toward sex laws. This is clearly yet another instance of "consider the source." I am definitely not burying my head in the sand, because i reject your call to "retool" society's response to domestic violence, and consider your use of a term such as "intimate violence" to be beneath contempt. Don't bother to run out to find other sources who use the term, my response to it will not change just because there are other nut cases out there who can't call a spade a spade, and a crime a crime.
People who violently abuse their spouses and/or their children are people who have serious and very likely pathological problems in governing their tempers, and therefore clearly pose a threat to society. Society has a perfect right to deal with such people in a manner intended to lessen or prevent violent acts by such people. That pre-adolescents and teenagers are confused with this issue is a pretty pathetic excuse for your drivel suggesting that sex laws ought to be reconsidered. It is equally pathetic that you attempt to suggest that those who do not agree with you are unable to discuss social taboos. Sex laws, by the way, define crime, not taboos. What is most pathetic is yet another attempt on your part to claim that the laws by which society deals with sex and violence are a product of an unwillingness to face the truth. Everyone here is facing the truth, which is that physical violence always equals abuse, and that society has a perfect right not to tolerate such abuse.
Rapist Boy, you are a serious loser.