18
   

Welcome Sports Haters!

 
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 01:17 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Take it anyway you like Dave. Those who understand English know what I meant.
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 01:18 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Nonsense. That is not even trivial bullying, nor bullying of any kind.

I have to agree - that's life - that's what that is.
(sorry Spendius - I know English is your first language - but he's right - that's not bullying).
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 01:33 pm
@wmwcjr,
wmwcjr wrote:
Actually, my dad treated the concrete pourers and hod carriers with respect. I know that for a fact. I saw it. He was just as far from being a bully as you could imagine. In fact, he probably was bullied himself when he was a kid because of the stutttering problem he had. Because of his own humble roots, he respected the dignity of all people.
Even after he became wealthy, he would tell me,
"Don't trust rich people."
That 's right, but don 't trust anyone ELSE, either.






wmwcjr wrote:
My dad rejected racism before any civil rights legislation was
passed and punished me the very few times I used the n-word
when I was in elementary school.
What race are u?






wmwcjr wrote:
My parents once hired a black lady to work for them as a maid.
My dad demanded that I treat her with respect, which was unheard
of in those times. She was treated as an equal by both of my
parents. He taught me by his own actions to detest arrogance.
Spendius sounded arrogant, but u did not detest him, so far as is visible.





wmwcjr wrote:

Having a high salary didn't prolong his life. He still had health problems:
heart attack, diabetes. It's quite possible the stress of all his responsibilities
actually shortened his life. Your advice to loosen the chip on my
shoulder is respected, but you don't know me in real life.
It sounds like u r apologizing; u have no reason to do that.
Y don 't u defend yourself? Tell him off. U r a Texan;
u have a reputation to live up to (if u want to).





David


spendius
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 01:45 pm
Quote:
That 's right, but don 't trust anyone ELSE, either.


I trust everybody I meet as a matter of course.
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 01:51 pm
@spendius,
So do I! I read a post by another poster a week or so back in which she expressed the truth that she doesn't trust a person until they prove they can be trusted and I thought to myself then that I'm just the opposite - I trust everyone until they show me they shouldn't be trusted.

David - why do you find it so hard to trust? It sounds like it's not due to your P.E. teachers - so to what do you attribute that lack of ability to trust?
My own theory is that it's due to the line of work you pursued - although it sounds as if you had trouble trusting from a very early age - long before you chose your career.

If this is too personal - ignore me - but if not - I'd find it interesting to explore.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 02:12 pm
@aidan,
I know why I trust people. It pays. It's purely selfish. When somebody lets you down you just cross them off and if I let somebody down I accept them crossing me off. Not that I test it too far very much. I have done though.

It seems natural to me. I get more wary when I'm more than a mile from home but that doesn't happen so often. I'm a bit suspicious of anybody with a good job as well. You don't get good jobs by being trustworthy. That's the main lesson I learned from my political career which was quite short.

Ladies are a bit dodgy as well but I find that quite charming. A character on Coronation Street (Corrie) said the other week to a lady--"You can tell lies better than you can tell the truth".

Do you watch Corrie Rebecca?
Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 02:15 pm
@chai2,
I actually read every word, twice. I told you I didn't doubt you, I gave you real world example of other people who felt the same way and splashed it across our tv screens. I gave examples of how PE was handled around my neck of the woods, not for NIMBY reasons but because I wanted to show that there are better ways of doing things than torturing little kids for some he-man ideal. I didn't walk a mile in your shoes but I did go to school with kids who didn't like PE. I wasn't one of them but I can sympathize.
I don't know what else I can say. I'm sorry you think I'm being dismissive, I'm not. I can only speak of my own experience, in my own backyard.
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 02:24 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
Do you watch Corrie Rebecca?

No! It's funny that you ask though because this real-life friend I have who reminds me so much of you, (by the way) told me that I should watch Coronation Street. Well, I barely watch tv at all - I mean almost literally never- although the other night I saw a very interesting show on Antony Gormly -whom I'd never heard of and really like now- so it can be educational and worthwhile sometimes.
Anyway - we were on this trip together and every night he had to stop to watch Coronation Street,which actually surprised me- I'd never have pictured him watching that...and he said - 'You'll see - you'll watch it once and you'll be hooked - every night at 7:00 or 8:00' - I can't remember - the other show he watched was Eastenders which came on either right before or right after...He said, 'you'll be glued to the set.'

So I watched it and I just didn't get the allure. I'm not a soaps fan. I like mysteries, but in all actuality, I'd rather read the paper and read about real-life mysteries..

But I trust people because most of the people in my life have proven to be trustworthy, so it come naturally to me too. But I also think I'm a good judge of character. Jobs are inconsequential. The other week I was at a quiz with two friends and these two guys joined our team. One was a postman and one was a cop and I could tell immediately the postman was more trustworthy than the cop (or constable). And they were both men- not ladies - but I seem to find men at least as, if not more, trustworthy as women as well.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 02:31 pm
@Ceili,
Tell me Ceili--when they splashed the subject across your screens was it accompanied by an invitation to viewers to e-mail in with their opinions on the subject.

TV channels here are making a lot of money out of their cut of the electronic traffic they generate. Possibly near 50% of the charges.

So they choose subjects which a lot of viewers have experience of or are likely to have strong views about. The subject itself means nothing to them.
chai2
 
  0  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 02:32 pm
@Ceili,
Ceili wrote:

I actually read every word, twice. I told you I didn't doubt you, I gave you real world example of other people who felt the same way and splashed it across our tv screens. I gave examples of how PE was handled around my neck of the woods, not for NIMBY reasons but because I wanted to show that there are better ways of doing things than torturing little kids for some he-man ideal. I didn't walk a mile in your shoes but I did go to school with kids who didn't like PE. I wasn't one of them but I can sympathize.
I don't know what else I can say. I'm sorry you think I'm being dismissive, I'm not. I can only speak of my own experience, in my own backyard.


I'm not being dismissive, just frustrated.
I never said anything about any he-man ideal, or torturing little kids.

It is what it is.
wmwcjr
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 02:45 pm
@spendius,
I would assume there's a marked difference between parochial schools and public schools. The particular experiences I related in my posts all took place in public schools. Ordinarily, I would expect more emphasis upon moral standards in parochial schools, not to mention teaching morals in the classroom. Generally speaking, kids with moral standards are considerably less likely to engage in bullying than those who see no use for moral ideals. Hence, the difference in our observations..
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 02:48 pm
@aidan,
aidan wrote:

So do I! I read a post by another poster a week or so back
in which she expressed the truth that she doesn't trust a person
until they prove they can be trusted
ANYONE can be trusted; no one shoud be trusted.






aidan wrote:
and I thought to myself then that I'm just the opposite -
I trust everyone until they show me they shouldn't be trusted.
It is very poor judgment to go around promiscuously trusting people.
There r 2 kinds of people in the world: fools n cynics.
(no offense)
Spendius has already revealed which group includes him.





aidan wrote:
David - why do you find it so hard to trust?
Its EZ trust, (I never said it was hard) but its very unwise.
Like drunken driving, trusting shoud be kept to a minimum.








aidan wrote:
It sounds like it's not due to your P.E. teachers -
It never even occurred to me to trust one of THEM.
Thay were only strangers.





aidan wrote:
so to what do you attribute that lack of ability to trust?
A valuable lesson from another kid when I was 11.
I am perfectly ABLE to trust, the same as I can drive drunk,
but I choose to avoid both, in the exercise of prudence.





aidan wrote:
My own theory is that it's due to the line of work you pursued -
although it sounds as if you had trouble trusting from a very early age -
long before you chose your career.
I was 11, when against my better judgment, I trusted another kid not to steal my property.
Upon his betrayal, I resolved to stop trusting, but in its purest application, that proved not to be viable,
so I modified it to: "don 't trust anyone with more than u r willing to lose."



aidan wrote:
if this is too personal - ignore me - but if not - I'd find it interesting to explore.
Its not personal. Its just good judgment; I recommend universally. Thay shoud teach it in schools,
supplemented by the non-reliability of gratitude and fonetic spelling.





David
Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 02:56 pm
@spendius,
Have you never watched a movie or sitcom where there were nerds who hated sports? Writers write what they know and some of them obviously hated gym class and they write it into their story lines. There are plenty of examples of people who hated these classes, it translates into popular cliches. Just as you can see fictional examples of the perfect coach. Anybody can send an email to these shows. People write fan letters and opinions all over the place, but ultimately if they don't like the show, it's seen in the numbers and the shows are cancelled or feted.
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 02:58 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
ANYONEcan be trusted; no one shoud be trusted.

Even a person who has proven him or herself trustworthy to you?
Do you think it's fair not to trust someone who has been totally trustworthy as far as you're concerned?
How would you maintain any relationships with such an obvious lack of trust toward someone who deserved your trust?

Quote:
Spendius has already revealed which group includes him
.
I've been communicating with Spendius for around four years, and I'd be hardpressed to identify which Spendius is with any certainty- I definitely don't think he's a fool and I'd have been tempted to label him a cynic until tonight when he said he trusts everyone he meets as a matter of course. So I'd be interested to know which group you believe Spendius has revealed himself to be included among, owing to the fact that at this point, I have no idea, as I'd have to say it's six of one and half dozen of the other.

Quote:
I was 11, when against my better judgment, I trusted another kid not to steal my property.
Upon his betrayal, I resolved to stop trusting, but in its purest application, that proved not to be viable,
so I modified it to: "don 't trust anyone with more than u r willing to lose."

That makes sense.
Quote:

the non-reliability of gratitude

What do you mean by this?
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 03:00 pm
@wmwcjr,
wmwcjr wrote:

I would assume there's a marked difference between parochial schools and public schools. The particular experiences I related in my posts all took place in public schools. Ordinarily, I would expect more emphasis upon moral standards in parochial schools, not to mention teaching morals in the classroom. Generally speaking, kids with moral standards are considerably less likely to engage in bullying than those who see no use for moral ideals. Hence, the difference in our observations..
Do u BELIEVE that there 'd be agreement qua
WHAT constitutes "moral ideals"???

For MY part, I certainly challenged n rejected the philosophy
of most of my teachers and my father (a Roosevelt Democrat).




David
0 Replies
 
Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 03:05 pm
@chai2,
Perhaps you should reread what I said. I did not say you were being dismissive, I apologized and said I was not trying to be dismissive. I was not putting words into your mouth, just expanding on the whole premise of the thread.
0 Replies
 
wmwcjr
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 03:16 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Sorry, I couldn't figure out how to insert your post. I'm new at this.

As per not trusting anyone else either, that would depend on initial impressions and what you may have heard about that person from others.

What race am I? White. I am aware that there are also black racists and racist individuals in every other race and that there is racism in probably every country.

I hate the sin, love the sinner. I don't know spendius personally; so, I'm not able to make a judgment. After learning the hard way, I now try to avoid being confrontational at websites. In this very topic I immediately reacted in attack mode in my first post, crashed and burned, and ended up making a public apology in this thread. Referring to my refusal to engage in name-calling in posts and trying to reason with hateful people at another website, a friend of mine has told me on more than one occasion, "You're too polite."

Actually, I wasn't apologizing to spendius (sounds like a username for a liberal, just kidding). And I did defend myself, and pointed out how my dad did not fit spendius' model. You must understand. Although I was born in Texas, both of my parents were Oklahomans who were restrained in their behavior and their reactions towards others. I guess I just don't fit the stereotype. And here's a shocker to come out of the lips of a Texan: I don't even know how the game of football is played. (scandalous!)

OmSigDAVID, you're a funny guy. Keep posting.


OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 03:41 pm
@aidan,
David wrote:

ANYONE can be trusted; no one shoud be trusted.

Quote:
Even a person who has proven him or herself trustworthy to you?
Such proof is near impossible.
U have failed to apply the criterion of time to the question.
U have failed to apply the criterion of change in circumstances to the question.
If we know that someone was trustworthy on Monday
that does not prove that he will be trustworthy on Thursday.
If he proves that he will not steal $1000 of your property,
that does not prove that he will not steal $1,000, 000.
If he has proven that he will not steal your money,
that will not prove that he will not steal your wife (or vice versa).


aidan wrote:
Do you think it's fair not to trust someone who has been totally trustworthy as far as you're concerned?
Yes; u don t owe anyone trust.






aidan wrote:
How would you maintain any relationships with such an obvious lack of trust toward someone who deserved your trust?
The same as before; most of the time, the issue of trust
is not brought up in conversation. The last time that I had it come up,
the chick who brawt it up was going to use it to work me.



David wrote:
Spendius has already revealed which group includes him
.
aidan wrote:
I've been communicating with Spendius for around four years,
and I'd be hardpressed to identify which Spendius is with any certainty-
I definitely don't think he's a fool and I'd have been tempted
to label him a cynic until tonight when he said he trusts everyone
he meets as a matter of course. So I'd be interested to know
which group you believe Spendius has revealed himself to be
included among, owing to the fact that at this point, I have no idea,
as I'd have to say it's six of one and half dozen of the other.
I 'll accept his word at face value, as a declaration against interest.




David wrote:

the non-reliability of gratitude
aidan wrote:
What do you mean by this?
Gratitude wears out quickly; it has a short shelf life.
As a general rule, u 'll get little mileage from gratitude;
i.e., u can do people a lot of major favors, but it is human nature
for them to forget them or to mentally devalue them, with the passage of time,
tho there R a few people (very few) who r sufficiently honorable to pay u back appropriately.





David
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 03:59 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Such proof is near impossible.
U have failed to apply the criterion of time to the question.
U have failed to apply the criterion of change in circumstances to the question.
If we know that someone was trustworthy on Monday
that does not prove that he will be trustworthy on Thursday.
If he proves that he will not steal $1000 of your property,
that does not prove that he will not steal $1,000, 000.
If he has proven that he will not steal your money,
that will not prove that he will not steal your wife (or vice versa).

How about someone who has proven to you over and over again that they can be relied upon to behave in such a way that they show you that you're more important than any amount of money and someone they wouldn't want to hurt or harm in any way?

Quote:
Gratitude wears out quickly; it has a short shelf life.
As a general rule, u 'll get little mileage from gratitude;
i.e., u can do people a lot of major favors, but it is human nature
for them to forget them or to mentally devalue them, with the passage of time,
tho there R a few people (very few) who r sufficiently honorable to pay u back appropriately.

David - I don't know what to say to that except I'm sorry that's been your experience.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 04:09 pm
@wmwcjr,
wmwcjr wrote:

Sorry, I couldn't figure out how to insert your post.
I'm new at this.
Welcome to the forum.






wmwcjr wrote:
As per not trusting anyone else either, that would depend on initial impressions
and what you may have heard about that person from others.
Bear in mind that the deployed skills of the most dangerous con men
are to conceal the need for caution in their presence.








wmwcjr wrote:
I hate the sin, love the sinner. I don't know spendius personally;
so, I'm not able to make a judgment.
Most of us don 't, but we know what he writes.







wmwcjr wrote:
After learning the hard way, I now try to avoid being confrontational at websites. In this very topic I immediately reacted in attack mode in my first post, crashed and burned, and ended up making a public apology in this thread. Referring to my refusal to engage in name-calling in posts and trying to reason with hateful people at another website, a friend of mine has told me on more than one occasion, "You're too polite."
He 's a good friend.





wmwcjr wrote:
Actually, I wasn't apologizing to spendius (sounds like a username for a liberal, just kidding). And I did defend myself, and pointed out how my dad did not fit spendius' model. You must understand. Although I was born in Texas, both of my parents were Oklahomans who were restrained in their behavior and their reactions towards others. I guess I just don't fit the stereotype.
I may have been out-of-line, with my advice;
". . . and this above all: to thine own self be true and it must follow as the night the day
that thou canst be false to no man." Bill Shakespeare (Hamlet)







wmwcjr wrote:
And here's a shocker to come out of the lips of a Texan:
I don't even know how the game of football is played. (scandalous!)
Me too; it remains a matter of indifference to me
which group of strangers prevails in strife over which other strangers who compete for NOTHING.






wmwcjr wrote:
OmSigDAVID, you're a funny guy. Keep posting.
OK; thank u, u too !





David


0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Should cheerleading be a sport? - Discussion by joefromchicago
Are You Ready For Fantasy Baseball - 2009? - Discussion by realjohnboy
tennis grip - Question by madalina
How much faster could Usain Bolt have gone? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Sochi Olympics a Resounding Success - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/15/2025 at 09:09:40