0
   

Memories of 21, 42, 63 ... the 84th meandering

 
 
sumac
 
  3  
Reply Fri 6 Nov, 2009 01:15 pm
November 6, 2009
Democrats Push Climate Bill Through Panel Without G.O.P. Debate
By JOHN M. BRODER

WASHINGTON " In a step that reflected deep partisan divisions in the Senate over the issue of global warming, Democrats on the Environment and Public Works Committee pushed through a climate bill on Thursday without any debate or participation by Republicans.

The measure passed by an 11-to-1 vote with the support of all the Democratic committee members except Senator Max Baucus of Montana. The seven Republicans boycotted the committee meetings this week, saying they had not had sufficient time to study the bill and demanding that the Environmental Protection Agency conduct a thorough study of its economic costs and benefits.

The move suggests that President Obama and Democratic supporters of the bill will have serious problems assembling the votes needed to enact it when it comes to the Senate floor, probably not before next year.

Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, the committee’s chairwoman and co-sponsor of the bill, employed a rarely used exception to customary committee rules to muscle the 959-page measure through her panel. She conducted three days of hearings last week on the bill, known as S. 1733, but there was no debate on the complex measure, nor any chance for panel members to offer amendments.

Mrs. Boxer said that the E.P.A. had already conducted a preliminary analysis of the bill and that further study would be costly and duplicative. She said it was necessary to bypass the committee’s rule that required Republican participation because of Republican intransigence and the urgency of the issue.

“A majority of the committee,” she said in a statement, “believes that S. 1733, and the efforts that will be built upon it, will move us away from foreign oil imports that cost Americans $1 billion a day, it will protect our children from pollution, create millions of clean energy jobs and stimulate billions of dollars of private investment.”

The senior Republican on the environment committee, Senator James M. Inhofe of Oklahoma, said the bill would harm the American economy and cost millions of jobs. He said the Democrats’ decision to ram the bill through “marked the death knell” of efforts to enact a comprehensive climate change bill.

Mr. Baucus’s vote against the bill was another ominous sign. He is the influential chairman of the Finance Committee and a senior member of the Agriculture Committee, both of which will have major input in any final climate and energy legislation. He said the bill’s emission reduction targets were too ambitious and its agriculture provisions too weak. He said the measure had a long way to go.

“This is a first step,” he said Thursday. “There will be many other steps.”
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  3  
Reply Fri 6 Nov, 2009 02:55 pm
@Stradee,
Stradee, and everyone else here, this article from the New Yorker will really interest you - it's about a new book, but also the topic on which I first ran into Stradee lots of years ago: avoiding all unecessary (if possible just ALL) suffering of animals we keep for food:
http://www.newyorker.com/images/2009/11/09/p233/091109_r19006_p233.jpg
http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2009/11/09/091109crbo_books_kolbert
danon5
 
  3  
Reply Fri 6 Nov, 2009 06:56 pm
@High Seas,
Sad but true, Hoft. I like the part about the rabbit cornered by the chicks. Also, if I remember correctly, the first Thanksgiving meal wasn't centered around turkey - and, the local Native Americans brought the stuff and cooked it.

Happy clicking all ------------
0 Replies
 
Stradee
 
  3  
Reply Fri 6 Nov, 2009 08:05 pm
@High Seas,
A very good article, Hoft, and one who's contents we were preaching long before people began contemplating how their food was 'processed'.

Health, the enviornment, animal cruelty, the list is endless for good reasons why CAFO's should be outlawed.

Laws enacted to protect animals do not apply to CAFO's. Laws enacted to stop the horrific cruelty at slaughterhouses are not enforced.

If we don't speak for the animals, who will? Thanks for all you do, H.







0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  3  
Reply Sat 7 Nov, 2009 08:46 am
Love this image. Hope it comes through.

http://dingo.care2.com/pictures/content_manager/click2donate/rainforest/landing/click-background/rain3.jpg
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  2  
Reply Sat 7 Nov, 2009 08:48 am
Designing and building with whole trees.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/11/04/garden/20091105-tree-slideshow-B.JPG

Building With Whole Trees
By ANNE RAVER

STODDARD, Wis.

ROALD GUNDERSEN, an architect who may revolutionize the building industry, shinnied up a slender white ash near his house here on a recent afternoon, hoisting himself higher and higher until the limber trunk began to bend slowly toward the forest floor.

“Look at Papa!” his life and business partner, Amelia Baxter, 31, called to their 3-year-old daughter, Estella, who was crouching in the leaves, reaching for a mushroom. Their son, Cameron, 9 months, was nestled in a sling across Ms. Baxter’s chest.

Wild mushrooms and watercress are among the treasures of this 134-acre forest, but its greatest resource is its small-diameter trees " thousands like the one Mr. Gundersen, 49, was hugging like a monkey.

“Whooh!” he said, jumping to the ground and gingerly rubbing his back. “This isn’t as easy as it used to be. But see how the tree holds the memory of the weight?”

The ash, no more than five inches thick, was still bent toward the ground. Mr. Gundersen will continue to work on it, bending and pruning it over the next few years in this forest which lies about 10 miles east of the Mississippi River and 150 miles northwest of Madison.

Loggers pass over such trees because they are too small to mill, but this forester-architect, who founded Gundersen Design in 1991 and built his first house here two years later, has made a career of working with them.

“Curves are stronger than straight lines,” he explained. “A single arch supporting a roof can laterally brace the building in all directions.”

The firm, recently renamed Whole Tree Architecture and Construction, is also owned by Ms. Baxter, a onetime urban farmer and community organizer with a knack for administration and fundraising. She also manages a community forest project modeled after a community-supported agriculture project, in which paying members harvest sustainable riches like mushrooms, firewood and watercress from these woods, and those who want to build a house can select from about 1,000 trees, inventoried according to species, size and shape, and located with global positioning system coordinates, a living inventory that was paid for with a $150,000 grant from the United States Department of Agriculture.

According to research by the Forest Products Laboratory in Madison, run by the USDA, a whole, unmilled tree can support 50 percent more weight than the largest piece of lumber milled from the same tree. So Mr. Gundersen uses small-diameter trees as rafters and framing in his airy structures, and big trees felled by wind, disease or insects as powerful columns and curving beams.

Taking small trees from a crowded stand in the forest is much like thinning carrots in a row: the remaining plants get more light, air and nutrients. Carrots grow longer and straighter; trees get bigger and healthier.

And when the trees are left whole, they sequester carbon. “For every ton of wood, a ton and a half of carbon dioxide is locked up,” he said, whereas producing a ton of steel releases two to five tons of carbon. So the more whole wood is used in place of steel, the less carbon is pumped into the air.

These passive solar structures also need very little or no supplemental heat.

Tom Spaulding, the executive director of Angelic Organics Learning Center, near Rockford, Ill., northwest of Chicago, knows about this because he commissioned Mr. Gundersen to build a 1,600-square-foot training center in 2003. He said: “In the middle of winter, on a 20-below day, we’re in shorts, with the windows and doors open. And we don’t burn a bit of petroleum.”

“It’s eminently more frugal and sustainable than milling trees,” he added. “These are weed trees, so when you take them out, you improve the forest stand and get a building out of it. You haven’t stripped an entire hillside out west to build it, or used a lot of oil to transport the lumber.”

Mr. Gundersen had a rough feeling for all of this 16 years ago, when he started building a simple A-frame house here for his first wife and their son, Ian, now 15. He wanted to encourage local farmers to use materials like wood and straw from their own farms to build low-cost, energy-efficient structures. So he used small aspens that were crowding out young oaks nearby.

“I would just carry them home and peel them,” said Mr. Gundersen, who later realized he could peel them while they were standing, making them “a lot lighter to haul and not so dangerous to fell.”

Mr. Gundersen, who built most of the house singlehandedly, also recognized the beauty of large trees downed by disease or wind, and used the peeled trunks, shorn of their central branches a few feet from the crook, as supporting columns in the house. “I thought they were beautiful, but I didn’t think how strong they were,” he said.

“In architecture, how materials come together and how they are connected is really the god in the details,” he continued. “The connection is where things will fall apart,” he said, adding that the crook of a tree “has been time-tested by environmental conditions for 200 million years.”

He refers to that first house " which cost $15,000 (for plumbing, electrical, septic and other basic amenities, as well as $4,000 in paid labor) and a year of his own labor " as his master’s degree in architecture. Divorced in 1997, he now lives there with Ms. Baxter and their two children.

After finishing the A-frame, Mr. Gundersen built a 100-by-20-foot solar greenhouse next door with thick straw-bale walls on three sides, banked into the north slope. He used small-diameter, rot-resistant black locust trees for the timber framing.

A wall of double-paned glass, positioned to optimize the low-angle winter light, faces south. Growing beds angled slightly toward the sun are planted with rows of mustard greens, kale, chard, arugula, lettuces and herbs. Hanging trays of micro-greens and a fig and bay tree promise fresh food for the fall and winter.

But it is the Book End " the little house attached to the greenhouse, which is home to the firm’s project manager and his wife " that quietly vibrates with the spirit of the forest.

“We used a lot of standing dead elm here,” Mr. Gundersen said, pointing out the delicate trails, or galleries, left by the beetles that killed the tree. Peeled of their bark and satiny smooth, these trees have a presence that seems to draw one’s arm around their trunks and invite a viewer to lean into them, to soak up strength from these powerful old souls.

In this quiet farming community, where people may not have a lot of money to spend, but do have plenty of wood and straw, word of the beauty and practicality of Mr. Gundersen’s structures has spread. Solar greenhouses made of local materials can extend the growing season through winter, even in a place where temperatures can drop to 30 or 40 below. In the last 18 years, Whole Trees has built 25 of them here.

It’s part of a vision Mr. Gundersen developed after spending three years as a project architect on Biosphere 2, the three-acre glass-enclosed miniature world constructed near Tucson in the 1980s, which tried to replicate the earth’s systems, but foundered on carbon dioxide, acidic seas, failed crops and internal intrigues. After that experience, he wanted to build something more basic to human needs.

Mr. Gundersen grew up in nearby LaCrosse, where his Norwegian great-grandfather, a doctor, founded a local institution, the Gundersen Clinic; he comes from a clan of doctors and tree lovers. “There are 23 doctors in the family,” he said, including his father and uncle and four great-uncles, but he seems to be wired more like his great-grandmother Helga, whose family still owns a tree farm in Norway. He and his grandmother would often picnic on this piece of wild land, where he remembers picking watercress and wildflowers and building tree forts.

Now, to be in his buildings is to be among the trees.

“It almost feels like we’re in a forest, the trees have such a presence,” said Marcia Halligan, a client who is a farmer and Reiki instructor, standing among the birch posts of her airy bedroom.

She and her partner, Steven Adams, who grows seed for organic seed companies, worked with Mr. Gundersen on a design that uses 22 different kinds of wood, most of it from their own land outside Viroqua, southeast of Stoddard.

The economic downturn has put commissions for several large buildings for nonprofits and a 4,600-square-foot residence on hold, Mr. Gundersen and Ms. Baxter say, but the demand for small houses like theirs is up.

“It’s remarkable how many people have called this last year asking for 1,000-square-foot houses,” Ms. Baxter said. “People are downsizing for their retirement homes, and even younger folks are thinking about energy costs, environmental awareness and simplicity.”

Whole Trees can keep construction costs as low as $100 a square foot, not including site preparation, if the client is willing to shop for secondhand fixtures and the like.

As people begin to see forests as a resource, they may begin to take care of them rather than cutting them down to make room for cornfields or pastures. And the forests keep giving back.

“I’ve taken 20 trees per year off one acre, for 12 buildings,” Mr. Gundersen said. “You can never tell that we’ve taken out that much wood.”
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  3  
Reply Sat 7 Nov, 2009 09:00 am
Read the New Yorker article. Book sounds like a good primer.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  3  
Reply Sat 7 Nov, 2009 06:41 pm
@danon5,
New, faster puter is home - stuff's being loaded back on (need my pix and music!).

Set's birthday is tomorrow - mebbe his puter will go in next for a nice freshening up - shower and a shave!

Clicking (and re-entering accounts and passwords). Three months on the new puter - this one better last longer!

Was looking at the big moon the last couple of nights and thinking of my friends here.
danon5
 
  2  
Reply Sat 7 Nov, 2009 06:51 pm
@ehBeth,
Great about the puter, ehBeth..........Just remember when you go for the new W7 - it won't keep most of your programs so you will have to reload them later. Also, it didn't have sound with my compy - I had to go and get the sound driver and load the machine. Let's see,,,,,,hmmmm,,,,, Oh, also, the video I have needs upgrading to a new more powerful card. But, maybe you have the new 64bit system - mine is 5 yrs old and has the 32bit. That might make a difference.

All clicked........ enjoyed the tree house article sumac...........
ehBeth
 
  3  
Reply Sat 7 Nov, 2009 07:48 pm
@danon5,
Good reminder to check the sound driver - the sound is coming out through the wrong speakers - but things sound good overall.

The old optical mouse had given up the ghost not too long ago, so when I picked up the new puter this afternoon I also picked up a new optical mouse. It's quite lovely - flashing lights - looks a bit like a snowglobe - Crayola's finest Laughing
alex240101
 
  4  
Reply Sat 7 Nov, 2009 08:50 pm
@ehBeth,
Hello Rainforesters. Clicked.
ehBeth, quit staring at the lights.
0 Replies
 
Stradee
 
  3  
Reply Sun 8 Nov, 2009 01:26 am
@ehBeth,
Good news, Beth! Very Happy

Welcome back!!!

Very late clicks today -

A super visit with daughter and Marvin hosting Tyler's (the family guitar wizard) visit. Good conversation, excellent meal, and good memories shared the day.

Tomorrow the 49er Game. Smile

http://rainforest.care2.com/i?p=583091674

0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  4  
Reply Sun 8 Nov, 2009 07:55 am
Welcome back, ehBeth. Being without a puter is the worse. Hope the new one is satisfying. My video card is acting a little iffy from time to time. May need to be replaced. And mine is 5 years old too so can reasonably anticipate problems.
0 Replies
 
teenyboone
 
  4  
Reply Sun 8 Nov, 2009 09:19 am
@Stradee,
67 degrees here, today and I'm all clicked!
teenyboone
 
  4  
Reply Sun 8 Nov, 2009 09:30 am
@danon5,
Dan hope you and Patty are doing better. Weather changed and my limbs seized up! Old age, ya know. Thanks for all of your good wishes.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  2  
Reply Sun 8 Nov, 2009 10:14 am
All clicked, and for those of you who can take the subject matter.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703574604574499880131341174.html
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  3  
Reply Sun 8 Nov, 2009 10:33 am
Mourn the loss of a tree species in Peru.

November 8, 2009
Ecosystem in Peru Is Losing a Key Ally
By SIMON ROMERO

ICA, Peru " A small grove of huarango, the storied Peruvian tree that can live over a millennium, rests like a mirage amid the sand dunes on this city’s edge. The tree has provided the inhabitants of this desert with food and timber since before the Nazca civilization etched geoglyphs into the empty plain south of here about 2,000 years ago.

The huarango, a giant relative of the mesquite tree of the American Southwest, survived the rise and fall of Pre-Hispanic civilizations, and plunder by Spanish conquistadors, whose chroniclers were astounded by the abundance of huarango forests and the strange Andean camelids, like guanacos and llamas, that flourished there.

Today, though, Peruvians pose what might be a final challenge to the fragile ecosystem supported by the huarango near the southwestern coast of Peru. Villagers are cutting down the remnants of these once vast forests. They covet the tree as a source of charcoal and firewood.

The depletion of the huarango is raising alarm among ecologists and fostering a nascent effort to save it.

“We don’t realize that we are cutting off one of our own limbs when we destroy a huarango,” said Consuelo Borda, 34, who helps direct a small reforestation project here, explaining how the tree’s pods can be ground into flour, sweetened into molasses or fermented into beer.

But many Peruvians view the huarango as prime wood for charcoal to cook a signature chicken dish called “pollo broaster.” The long-burning huarango, a hardwood rivaling teak, outlasts other forms of charcoal. Villagers react to a prohibition by regional authorities on cutting down huarango with a shrug.

“The woodcutters come at night, using handsaws instead of chainsaws to avoid detection,” said Reina Juárez, 66, a maize farmer in San Pedro, a village of about 24 families near a grove of huarango on the outskirts of Ica. “They remove the wood by donkey and then sell it.”

That the huarango survives at all to be harvested may be something of a miracle. Following centuries of systematic deforestation, only about 1 percent of the original huarango woodlands that once existed in the Peruvian desert remain, according to archaeologists and ecologists.

Few trees are as well suited to the hyperarid ecosystem of the Atacama-Sechura Desert, nestled between the Andes and the Pacific. The huarango captures moisture coming from the west as sea mist. Its roots are among the longest of any tree, extending more than 150 feet to tap subterranean water channels.

The resilience of the huarango and its role in taming one of the world’s driest climates have long beguiled this country’s poets. Schoolchildren here, for instance, recite the words of José María Arguedas, a leading 20th-century writer: “The huarangos let in the sun, while keeping out the fire.”

But poetry is one thing. The necessities of human civilizations, and their capacity to wreak havoc on the ecosystems on which they depend, are another.

A team of British archaeologists described in a groundbreaking study this month how the Nazca, who etched their lines in the desert a thousand years before the arrival of the Spanish, induced an environmental catastrophe by clearing the huarango to plant crops like cotton and maize, exposing the landscape to desert winds, erosion and floods.

David Beresford-Jones, an archaeologist at Cambridge University who was a co-author of the study, said that perhaps the only fragment of old-growth huarango woodland left is in Usaca, about a five-hour drive from Ica, where there are still some trees that were alive when the Incas conquered the southern coast of Peru in the 15th century.

“It takes centuries for the huarango to be of substantial size, and only a few hours to fell it with a chainsaw,” Mr. Beresford-Jones said. “The tragedy is that this remnant is being chain-sawed by charcoal burners as we speak.”

With support from Britain’s Royal Botanical Gardens at Kew and Trees for Cities, a British charity promoting tree planting in urban areas, Ms. Borda’s reforestation project seeks to reverse the damage by the charcoal harvesters, whose mud ovens dot the desert landscape in villages around Ica.

It is an uphill struggle in an impoverished desert. The black market for huarango in raw firewood form thrives. A carbonero, or charcoal seller, can sell a kilogram of charcoal made from the tree for about 50 cents, or a bushel of huarango as firewood for about $1 " bargains in a place where a gallon of natural gas costs more than $10.

So far, Ms. Borda’s arduous project has planted about 20,000 huarangos in Ica and nearby areas. It also teaches schoolchildren about the history of the huarango in Peruvian culture and its significance as a keystone species for the desert, its roots fixing nitrogen in poor soil and its leaves and pods providing organic material as forage.

But researchers say the project is a trifle of what must be done to reforest Peru’s deserts.

“Peru needs a massive rethink about its development trajectory,” said Alex Chepstow-Lusty, a paleoecologist with the French Institute of Andean Studies who worked on the Nazca study with Mr. Beresford-Jones, the Cambridge University archaeologist, analyzing pollen that showed the transformation of Nazca lands from rich in huarango to fields of maize and cotton to the virtually lifeless desert that exists today.

“With Peru’s glaciers predicted to disappear by 2050, the Andes need trees to capture the moisture coming from Amazonia, which is also the source of water going down to the coast,” said Mr. Chepstow-Lusty in an interview from Cuzco, in Peru’s highlands. “Hence a major program of reforestation is required, both in the Andes and on the coast.”

Nothing on this scale is happening around Ica. Instead, the growth that one sees in poor villages are of shantytowns called pueblos jóvenes, where residents eke out a living as farmhands or in mining camps.

Outside one village, Santa Luisa, the buzz of a chainsaw interrupted the silence of the desert next to an oven preparing charcoal.

The chainsaw’s owner, a woodcutter from the highlands named Rolando Dávila, 48, swore that he no longer cut down huarango but focused instead on the espino, another hardy tree known as acacia macarantha. “But we all know huarango is the prize of the desert,” he said. “For many of us, the wood of the huarango is the only way to survive.”

Andrea Zárate contributed reporting from Lima, Peru.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  2  
Reply Sun 8 Nov, 2009 06:14 pm
Clicked through.

Took Set out for burgers and poutine for his birthday. The dogs and I then took him for a walk in the ravine system a few blocks away. We admired the trees that we helped plant during a community environment day a couple of years back - they're helping to stabilize a wetland that they're trying to bring back. Nice to see. Nice walk.
danon5
 
  2  
Reply Sun 8 Nov, 2009 06:31 pm
@ehBeth,
That sounded like a great walk, ehBeth ---- say Happy B'Day to the Set for us.

teeny, you said a magic word - one that doesn't fit in the rules.......((seized))..........and, how about ((neighbor))......... There goes the i before e except after c and after words that sound Canajan - like "aaaa?" rule...........Grin

Clicked.
teenyboone
 
  3  
Reply Sun 8 Nov, 2009 06:40 pm
@danon5,
Giggle!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/22/2025 at 01:17:45