@A Lone Voice,
A Lone Voice wrote:
Despise him, respect him, or be one of the poor souls with BDS, one issue where the Bush Administration was able to run out the clock was this:
Since 2001, there was not another terrorist attack on US soil.
A terrible measure of the effectiveness of a international policy that should stop terrorism at large.
A Lone Voice wrote:
Now, with the Obama admin closing Gitmo and undoing many of the policies Bush put in place, how will future attacks (if any) be evaluated?
How did we evaluate 9/11? We had a giant report created that illustrated what we knew, when we knew it, how we acted, and when we acted. The report was pretty critical of the Bush admin, but they didn't even blush.
It would be terrible if another attack was to happen, but I feel better with a president who can cultivate a stronger international effort over a totalitarian domestic effort.
A Lone Voice wrote:
Side note: It appears Obama is going back to the Clinton strategy of treating Islamic terror as a law enforcement issue rather than a military issue in their approach to homeland security. One question I haven't heard addressed is what will happen to those being released from Gitmo?
What will happen to those released is not just one answer. Those in Gitmo, fall into many categories. Those that shouldn't have ever been in there to begin with (Chinese Uighurs for example) should be released post haste. Those who should be tried, should be brought before a LEGITIMATE court.
A Lone Voice wrote:
One of the things that drove my pragmatic liberal friends in CA nuts was Jerry Brown's treatment of crime issues when Gov. His appt of Rose Bird and two other extreme left wing lawyers to the state supreme court led to their eventual recall and a law and order movement that only recently went away. Nothing angers voters like hearing about violent felons released by liberal judges, going out a few months later and victimizing yet more people.
Educate yourself. Not everyone in Gitmo is some violent criminal.
A Lone Voice wrote:
So what happens if some of these Gitmo releasees are found to be at the center of another 9-11? Two have already found their way back to terror groups.
You can't imprison people for crimes they may commit. If you have the evidence that they conspire to commit crimes sure, but if that's the case, send it to trial. Taking someone's freedom away should not be such a cavalier activity. If you ever wanted a reason to hate a country enough to fight back, imprisonment for years without a trial might be a pretty strong motivator. It might make you more prone to be recruited by people with the means to do harm.
A Lone Voice wrote:
Who is held accountable?
Those who commit the crimes.
A Lone Voice wrote:
Will the national press even raise the issue?
I can't tell you how many articles I've read on just this topic alone in the last year. I'm so sick of this conservative media victim meme...
T
K
O