@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:Israel's actions are also highly proportional.
No it's not. 100 tons of munition in a few hours is not a proportional response to the rocket threat and it's counterproductive to the goal of eradicating Hamas.
Quote:They are only doing what is necessary to eliminate the threat.
If these actions they are taking would actually eliminate the threat I'd be all for it. But if you follow this area of the world closely enough you should be under no illusion that this kind of bombing can eliminate the rocket threat (they just can't do that from the air) and would know that Israel is not making their citizens any safer this way.
In the last 7 years Israel suffered around 16 fatalities from rocket attacks. A third intifada would be a much greater danger to Israel's citizens than these rockets represent. The last intifada has been dead for quite a while now, and moderate leadership is in power in the West Bank, a disproportionate response with significant collateral damage bolsters support for extremism and presents a greater threat to Israel.
They needed to respond to Hamas breaking the cease fire, but the response should have been proportionate. Instead they are going to try to do as much systemic destruction to the civil infrastructure and Hamas as they can before the new cease fire comes into place.
Doing so both bolsters support for Hamas as well as reduces the ability for any Palestinian leadership to police themselves (e.g. this time they bombed over 40 police stations) and while it may be emotionally satisfying it's not strategically sound.