@hamburger,
hamburger wrote:Oralloy wrote:And free people have the right to defend themselves.
The more concealed weapons, the better.
glad to see your evaluation .
And free people have the right to defend themselves.
The more concealed atomic weapons , the better ???
I'd count Iran having nukes as less like "an ordinary person carrying a gun for self-defense" and more like "a mafia gangster carrying a gun to intimidate local businesses into paying protection money".
Also, Iran voluntarily gave up their right to have nukes when they joined the NPT.
hamburger wrote:btw i believe those nations that have signed the non-proliferation treaty are free to renounce the treaty anytime ... just like people currently not carrying a concealed weapon , are free to decide anytime to carry a concealed weapon .
hbg
Yes. And had Iran renounced the NPT before starting their nuclear weapons program, there would be merit to an argument that the weapons program was legal.
However, they are developing nuclear weapons without having first renounced the treaty.
If they now try to legitimize their existing program by renouncing the treaty, I don't think either the US or Israel will accept the program as legitimate. (For that matter, I don't think the EU would consider the program as legitimate either.)