Who are you ignoring?

I have no one on Ignore, realjohnboy because I am not afraid to debate with anyone on these threads. Now,some old ladies may be offended when I called Obama a mulatto. But why is anyone offended when one properly identifies him? He is a mulatto as defined in the dictionary as one who is the offspring of a white and Negro union.

Why would I use such a term? It is on the borderline of offensiveness and is not politically correct. I will continue to use such CORRECT DEFINITIONS until morons like ci stop insulting John McCain by asking

McCain was a POW?

He was and defended his country. Ther idiot ci tells lies. I did not lie when I labeled Obama a mulatto.

I will continue to use such CORRECT DEFINITIONS until mental defectives(SELF-Defined) like Bi Polar--noting that John Mc Cain was walking stiffly( because his broken legs were not taken care of in the POW camp by the VIET cong) SAID-- He walked like that because he was wearing D epends.

As long as morons like ci and bipolar can mouth lies about McCain, I can and will tell the truth(MULATTO) about Obama.

You are correct, as ususal,Finn. People can scroll past or even put people on ignore. But it would take someone with unusual self controlto scroll past catchin a glimpse of their thesis being ripped to pieces and shown to be erroneous.

That is why, Finn, the cowards with no backbone who are fearful that they can't handle arguments based on evidence and documentation, will use( SHOULD USE SINCE THEY ARE INCAPABLE OF DEBATING) the ignore feature.

But I know where to find people on these threads who still believe in FREEDOM of EXPRESSION