@shewolfnm,
shewolfnm wrote:
If I would have ignored him, I would never have seen it. Because doesnt ignoring someone remove their threads from view??
Yes it does. So if you enjoy someone's unhinged rants, then dont put them on ignore. I sometimes enjoy 'em too - part of why I dont have CJ on my list either (plus, he's got a good sense of humor).
Any case, yeah, if you enjoy that kind of threads, then dont ignore them. And if someone else doesnt, then let 'em ignore them. Why shouldnt they? The new site allows people to all do it their own way, so why not let them, instead of calling people "power hungry" and stuff just cause they do it another way?
(What's the big moral difference between ignoring someone's threads the old-fashioned way, by scrolling and rolling your eyes, or the new way, by putting them on ignore, anyway? How's one good and the other "power hungry"? I dont get it.)
Anyway, just let people do it their own way and dont call 'em names for it. Live and let live. {shrugs}
shewolfnm wrote:if you believe for one second that a single candidate is better then the other then I could polish a cat turd and sell it to you as an antique.
Huh. We see this differently too. Way I see it, if you believe that there's no difference at all between McCain's conservatives and Obama's liberals, sorry, but it's you who "could be sold a polished cat turd to", as you, uh, put it.
I guess we just see opposing things as naive.