29
   

FINAL COUNTDOWN FOR USA ELECTION 2008

 
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 03:19 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:

DontTreadOnMe wrote:

there's a real smell of right-wing desperation in the air.

they see their stranglehold on america slipping away.

it would be sad if it weren't so richly deserved.


That's funny. That is just what I was thinking about YOUR side. Smile


pahabs you gawd a code indour dose? Wink
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 03:29 pm
@FreeDuck,
Duck, he started out the press conference drawing a comparison between himself and Palin. Remember the press conference was called, in my opinion, to try to diffuse her enormous success Wednesday night. McCain hadn't spoken yet. Who else was he making comparisons with other than what she said on Wednesday night? He ticked off what she hadn't said.....in some detail.

A reporter asked him why his campaign was diminishing her accomplishments and experience. He backpedaled a bit on that, because they certainly HAVE made such statements, but only in an offhand way.

Some other different comments:

Obama spokesman Bill Burton:
Quote:
Today, John McCain put the former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from the presidency. Governor Palin shares John McCain's commitment to overturning Roe v. Wade, the agenda of Big Oil and continuing George Bush's failed economic policies -- that's not the change we need, it's just more of the same.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0808/Obama_campaign_blasts_Palin.html


Quote:
Barack Obama's campaign -- thrown for a loop like the rest of the political world by John McCain's stunning choice of Sarah Palin as his running mate -- is trying to adjust on the fly.

After initially sending out a blistering statement belittling the first-term Alaska governor as "the former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience," the Democratic nominee's camp has since taken a two-track strategy.

The candidate, himself, is nodding to the historic nature of her selection, while emphasizing the argument that she, like McCain, represents a continuation of President Bush. Obama's first TV ad on Palin makes the same point -- trying to rebut the McCain campaign portraying her as a younger maverick reformer who will shake up Washington.

"Well, he’’s made his choice," the announcer says in the Obama spot. "But, for the rest of us, there’’s still no change. McCain doesn’’t get it, calling this broken economy 'strong.' Wants to keep spending $10 billion a month in Iraq. And votes with George Bush 90 percent of the time.

"So, while this may be his running-mate," the announcer says over an image of McCain with Palin, "America knows this is John McCain’’s agenda," with an image of McCain and Bush. "And we can’’t afford four more years of the same."

But on a separate track, Obama's campaign is continuing to rip the choice of Palin, sending out one critical article or editorial after another and accusing him of pandering to women and to the religious right.

And Obama's surrogates are trying to make the case that McCain failed his first true test of leadership, picking someone unqualified even though he had said repeatedly that his first criteria for selection was someone who could step in as president if, God forbid, something happened to him.
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/08/obama_reacts_to.html
Cycloptichorn
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 03:32 pm
@Foxfyre,
I just watched the same thing, and Fox - you're full of ****. He didn't compare himself to Palin at all. He spoke about what she didn't speak about. He laughed off her pathetic attempts at insult.

Geez, you live in an alternate world, yaknow that?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  3  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 03:40 pm
Now, for more interesting fare:

Quote:
Obama: 'Not about the issues' comment means making stuff up
Posted: 04:45 PM ET

From CNN Political Producer Alexander Marquardt

DURYEA, Pennsylvania (CNN) " Barack Obama continued to hammer the McCain campaign on Friday for manager Rick Davis’s comments that the election would be more about the candidates’ personas, not the issues. The Illinois senator said he’s not running for president for his “pretty good personality” and that it’s a sign Republicans intend to scare voters away from him with false accusations of Muslim and radical connections.

“When [the Republicans] say this isn’t about issues it’s about personalities what they’re really saying is “we’re going to try to scare people about Barack”,” he told a small gathering at a glass factory near Scranton. “”We’re going to say that you know, maybe he’s got Muslim connections or we’re going to say that, you know, he hangs out with radicals or he’s not patriotic.” Just making stuff up.”

“I mean I think I’ve got a pretty good personality! But that’s not why I am running for president,” Obama said, later adding, “If you want it to be about personalities, you know, we’ll go out for a beer sometime and we’ll talk but you know you don’t have time, you’d rather spend it with your family.”

Obama has repeatedly hit Republicans this week of for lacking substance at their convention in St. Paul and consistently brands the G0P as out of touch.

“If you’ve got the kind of record they’ve got over the last eight years then, of course, you don’t want to spend a lot of time talking about the issues,” said Obama. He blasted McCain on the economy, called his energy plan “made for TV” and accused the Arizona senator of having no education plan.

“Apparently Barack Obama was not listening when John McCain and Sarah Palin offered their plans to keep taxes low and create new jobs,” responded RNC spokesman Alex Conant. “On the other hand, Barack Obama’s economic policies would only raise taxes and eliminate jobs.”

Obama gave a lengthy defense during the Q&A portion of the event when a woman asked about rumors that he was going to take away their guns, an issue that has gotten him in some hot water in the past.

“I think this is a great question so I just want to clear it up,” he started. “The 2nd amendment is an individual right and it means something: that people have a right to bear arms. What I also believe is that there’s nothing wrong with some common sense gun safety measures.”

“The bottom line is this: if you’ve got a rifle, you’ve got a shotgun, you’ve got a gun in your house, I’m not taking it away,” he said, adding that even if he wanted to, he couldn’t get it through Congress.

“I hope I made that clear,” he wrapped up, “Is everybody clear back there in the back? ‘Cause I see a couple sportsmen back there. All right? Spread the word with your friends. I’m not going to take away your guns.”


http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/05/obama-not-about-the-issues-comment-means-making-stuff-up/

Maporsche, are you listening? Lol

Cycloptichorn
FreeDuck
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 03:44 pm
@Foxfyre,
Fox, do you understand what a comparison is? I dont see anything wrong with the way the campaign has responded in the bits you quoted, but they are not drawing a comparison between Obama and Palin. What is it that you see? Responding to the attacks by Palin and Giuliani (among others) is necessary and fair. But thats not the same as comparing himself to Palin.
Foxfyre
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 03:47 pm
@FreeDuck,
It could be a difference in perception. In a political campaign, I don't see comparisons as being I am black, she is white or I am Democrat, she is Republican, etc. I see the comparisons as being drawn between what "I" offer versus what 'she' offers, "I" am qualified, "she isn't" etc. That is what he did or at least implied. Nobody can tell me that wasn't the purpose of the press conference called just hours before McCain's acceptance speech.
FreeDuck
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 03:49 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:

It could be a difference in perception. In a political campaign, I don't see comparisons as being I am black, she is white or I am Democrat, she is Republican, etc. I see the comparisons as being drawn between what "I" offer versus what 'she' offers, "I" am qualified, "she isn't" etc. That is what he did.


Sorry, no, thats not what he did. Obviously, this is a campaign, both are going to say why they think theyre better than the other party. But Obama made no direct comparison between himself and Gov. Palin. And to my knowledge, neither has his campaign. The fact remains that it is the McCain camp that is drawing the comparison. I am asking why you think that is.
wandeljw
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 03:50 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Last Sunday morning on ABC, George Will suggested that people will vote according to values rather than issues. According to Will, Palin will energize the base of the Republican party because she chose to carry a Down's syndrome baby to full term.
Foxfyre
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 03:52 pm
@FreeDuck,
FreeDuck wrote:

Foxfyre wrote:

It could be a difference in perception. In a political campaign, I don't see comparisons as being I am black, she is white or I am Democrat, she is Republican, etc. I see the comparisons as being drawn between what "I" offer versus what 'she' offers, "I" am qualified, "she isn't" etc. That is what he did.


Sorry, no, thats not what he did. Obviously, this is a campaign, both are going to say why they think theyre better than the other party. But Obama made no direct comparison between himself and Gov. Palin. And to my knowledge, neither has his campaign. The fact remains that it is the McCain camp that is drawing the comparison. I am asking why you think that is.


Well, we'll just have to agree to disagree on the press conference because we are obviously hearing difference things. Read again those two excerpts I posted earlier. You have the same opinion about the 'purity' of the Obama campaign re those?
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 03:58 pm
@wandeljw,
wandeljw wrote:

Last Sunday morning on ABC, George Will suggested that people will vote according to values rather than issues. According to Will, Palin will energize the base of the Republican party because she chose to carry a Down's syndrome baby to full term.


He said it in just those terms? I do believe those who are strong pro-life proponents in the party are giving her a huge thumbs up for her choice to carry Trigg to full term. He is a person you know, a human being with a name and a capacity for joy and love, much more than just a "Down's syndrome baby". True pro-lifers do not believe in a 'designer children' policy in which you abort the imperfect until you get the one you want.

You may disagree strongly with such pro-lifers, but the fact is they are out there and they are part of the base. And they have as much right to appreciate a candidate who shares their convictions as you have the right to appreciate a candidate who thinks it is okay to kill the aborted fetus that survives since the intention was to kill it anyway.

And that is just one of many MANY issues for which there are clear differences between the candidates. (And no, I don't wish to debate the pros and cons of pro choice and pro life here. Let's just recognize what each is and understand the position of our respective candidates.)
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 04:15 pm
@DontTreadOnMe,
DontTreadOnMe wrote:

there is the thought that macker is simply a trojan horse.

suppose mac gets elected. then 6 months or a year into his term, he leaves office due to health reasons.

palin finishes his term. then runs for president on her own. question is, in this scenario would she also be allowed to run a 2nd free standing campaign for what would in effect be a 3rd term?


That is interesting though too far off into conspiracy land for me at the moment. I wish I knew more about her, though. It bothers me that someone so unknown could end up being president when it isnt likely she could have gotten her partys nomination for that office from the voters in the primary.
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 04:21 pm
@FreeDuck,
When you see McCain's 96 year-old-mother easily getting up out of her chair for standing ovations, grinning ear to ear, and giving entirely coherant and intelligent interviews, the probability of him finishing one, even two terms is certainly more plausible than not. I think he has wanted this chance for far too long to quickly give up the opportunity should he prevail in November.

The one that may be in the quandary is Hillary. I think she sincerely does not want Obama to beat McCain because then she will have to wait eight long years for her next attempt. But what if she faces Sarah Palin in four years instead of McCain? Would that be a scary concept for her?

I think a whole lot of us are not having a hard time imagining a President Palin if she continues to present herself as capably as she has thus far.

Interesting stuff may be going on behind the scenes these days. (Speaking of conspiracy theories though I think maybe mine is more plausible than DTOMs. Smile)
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 04:23 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:

Well, we'll just have to agree to disagree on the press conference because we are obviously hearing difference things.

Clearly.
Quote:
Read again those two excerpts I posted earlier. You have the same opinion about the 'purity' of the Obama campaign re those?
Purity? Come on. Look, maybe you can save us both time and just tell me exactly what it is that you see wrong in what the campaign had to say in the excerpts you posted.
Foxfyre
 
  3  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 04:27 pm
@FreeDuck,
FreeDuck wrote:

Foxfyre wrote:

Well, we'll just have to agree to disagree on the press conference because we are obviously hearing difference things.

Clearly.
Quote:
Read again those two excerpts I posted earlier. You have the same opinion about the 'purity' of the Obama campaign re those?
Purity? Come on. Look, maybe you can save us both time and just tell me exactly what it is that you see wrong in what the campaign had to say in the excerpts you posted.


I saw nothing wrong in the excerpts I just posted. I see a LOT wrong with the spin and rhetoric trying to portray the Obama campaign as so high minded and so pure and above-the-fray that any criticism of their words or intentions or tactics or motives is unwarranted. They can and do play just as down and dirty as anybody else. Which was my whole point all along.

I don't think it is necessary to dissect every component that goes into my point in order to recognize that this is my point.

And so far, nobody has been able to show me that my point is wrong.
JTT
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 04:36 pm
@Foxfyre,
Quote:
And so far, nobody has been able to show me that my point is wrong.


Nobody could ever show you just how spectacularly wrong you've been over the years because you're unable to part with your preconceived, ill thought out notions.

The last eight years have been such a monstrous failure and the plain truth is you know it. This is where your preconceived, ill thought out notions are replaced by a mendacity that defies belief.

Quote:
Senator Biden:

“It’s not merely a lost job, it’s a lost sense of identity. I don’t think my Republican friends " and this is not your father’s Republican party, by the way. So folks, when I listen to the parts of the Republican convention I can hear…it’s not what I heard, it’s what I didn’t hear. The silence of the Republican party was deafening. It was deafening on jobs, on health care, on the environment, on all the things that matter to the people in the neighborhood’s I grew up in. Deafening! Their America is not the America I live in. They see something different than I see.

“Rick Davis, John’s campaign manager, said ‘this election is not about issues.’ Everything I saw at the convention demonstrated that.

“What do you talk about about when you have nothing to say? What do you talk about when you can’t explain the last eight years of failure?”
FreeDuck
 
  3  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 04:42 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:

I saw nothing wrong in the excerpts I just posted. I see a LOT wrong with the spin and rhetoric trying to portray the Obama campaign as so high minded and so pure and above-the-fray that any criticism of their words or intentions or tactics or motives is unwarranted. They can and do play just as down and dirty as anybody else. Which was my whole point all along.

Wait. You saw nothing wrong in the excerpts, yet you used them to illustrate your point, which is that the Obama campaign can and do play just as down and dirty as anybody else. So, harmless quotes equals down and dirty. Do I have that right?

Quote:
I don't think it is necessary to dissect every component that goes into my point in order to recognize that this is my point.


This is your point? After talking about who is making the comparisons between Obama and Palin, and going round and round about whether Obama did it in a press conference (with the revolver), it turns out that your point all along is that the Obama campaign is not pure of heart?

Foxfyre
 
  3  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 04:43 pm
@JTT,
I think the Democrats would be a lot less boring if they would just become educated enough to know that President Bush isn't running in this election. But whatever. Keep the focus there and stew in that theme while McCain/Palin pull away and go for the prize.
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 04:44 pm
@DontTreadOnMe,
Constitution addresses it.

She can run for one more term if you fills 3 1/2 years of the previous

Quote:
Amendment XXII

Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 04:45 pm
@FreeDuck,
I wouldn't expect an admission of error, FD, no matter how much logic you apply.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 04:49 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:

I think the Democrats would be a lot less boring if they would just become educated enough to know that President Bush isn't running in this election. But whatever. Keep the focus there and stew in that theme while McCain/Palin pull away and go for the prize.


He might as well be - your candidate agrees with him on every issue that matters. Which you know, of course.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 11:07:06