@FreeDuck,
FreeDuck wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
Dunno. I sure think her assertion that she would "love to have Palin on" holds no water whatsoever. Very magnanimous of her to maintain 'neutrality' on her show AFTER she has given her chosen candidate some significant face time though, don't you think?
Greenwitch, whom I know to be an Obama supporter, is taking a much more realistic view than Oprah is.
I can see how, having already endorsed a candidate, she might think it better not to use her show to interview any candidates. Can you see how those interviews would be picked apart for bias? Oprah is not stupid -- I am sure she knows how some people would take it if she doesnt have Palin on. But if she says she promised not to have any candidates on, and she hasnt up till now, then she is just being consistent.
I think its all moot anyway. Palin doesnt seem interested in giving interviews.
Ah, okay. I did miss this. Sorry.
No, Oprah is not stupid. But she does have herself in a bit of a mess re Palin I think.
Why do you say that Palin is not interested in giving interviews? She is, after all, the VP candidate for a whole week, the GOP convention ended last night, and she has been out on the campaign trail doing a lot of pretty emphatic straight talk today. Neither Obama nor Biden were expected to give interviews during their conventions.