FINAL COUNTDOWN FOR USA ELECTION 2008

According to news coverage at the time, the librarian said she would definitely not be all right with it. A few months later, the librarian, Mary Ellen Emmons, got a letter from Palin telling her she was going to be fired. The censorship issue was not mentioned as a reason for the firing. The letter just said the new mayor felt Emmons didn't fully support her and had to go.
Emmons had been city librarian for seven years and was well liked. After a wave of public support for her, Palin relented and let Emmons keep her job

But the situation calmed, and rather than being recalled, Palin was re-elected. She later acknowledged, "I grew tremendously in my early months as mayor."

Quote:

According to news coverage at the time, the librarian said she would definitely not be all right with it. A few months later, the librarian, Mary Ellen Emmons, got a letter from Palin telling her she was going to be fired. The censorship issue was not mentioned as a reason for the firing. The letter just said the new mayor felt Emmons didn't fully support her and had to go.
Emmons had been city librarian for seven years and was well liked. After a wave of public support for her, Palin relented and let Emmons keep her job

.
http://www.adn.com/sarah-palin/story/515512.html

From Walter’s source

Quote:

But the situation calmed, and rather than being recalled, Palin was re-elected. She later acknowledged, "I grew tremendously in my early months as mayor."

I’m sure Palin screwed up plenty in her first months as Chief Executive. I certainly did when I, totally inexperienced, was hired as executive director of a large social service agency. I made a lot of stupid mistakes and I made enemies. And I got stuff right and I learned how to avoid a lot of mistakes and I grew in the job and made more friends than I made enemies. At least the board kept renewing my contract and giving me raises. And I’m proud of my accomplishments during my tenure as I am sure I Sarah is proud of hers. (I in no way had the magnitude or degree of responsibility in my job that Sarah had in hers as Mayor of Wasilla.)

Cyclop, when you ONLY pick out things that put her in a bad light and misrepresent those, it's sliming. Sorry, but it really is.

Not a Book Burner
One false rumor accuses then-Mayor Palin of threatening to fire Wasilla's librarian for refusing to ban books from the town library. Some versions of the rumor come complete with a list of the books that Palin allegedly attempted to ban. The story is false on several fronts: Palin never asked that books be banned; the librarian continued to serve in that position; no books were actually banned; and many of the books on the list that Palin supposedly wanted to censor weren't even in print at the time, proving that the list is a fabrication.

It's true that Palin did raise the issue with Mary Ellen Emmons, Wasilla's librarian, on at least two occasions. Emmons flatly stated her opposition both times. But, as the Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman (Wasilla's local paper) reported at the time, Palin asked general questions about what Emmons would say if Palin requested that a book be banned. According to Emmons, Palin "was asking me how I would deal with her saying a book can't be in the library." Emmons reported that Palin pressed the issue, asking whether Emmons' position would change if residents were picketing the library. Wasilla resident Anne Kilkenny, who was at the meeting, corroborates Emmons' story, telling the Chicago Tribune that "Sarah said to Mary Ellen, 'What would your response be if I asked you to remove some books from the collection?' "

Palin characterized the exchange differently, initially volunteering the episode as an example of discussions with city employees about following her administration's agenda. Palin described her questions to Emmons as "rhetorical," noting that her questions "were asked in the context of professionalism regarding the library policy that is in place in our city." Actually, true rhetorical questions have implied answers (e.g., "Who do you think you are?"), so Palin probably meant to describe her questions as hypothetical or theoretical. We can't read minds, so it is impossible for us to know whether or not Palin may actually have wanted to ban books from the library or whether she simply wanted to know how her new employees would respond to an instruction from their boss. It is worth noting that, in an update, the Frontiersman points out that no book was ever banned from the library's shelves.

Moreover, although Palin fired Emmons as part of a "loyalty" purge, she rehired Emmons the next day, and Emmons remained at her job for two-and-a-half more years. Actually, Palin initially requested Emmons' resignation in October 1996, four days before the public discussion of censorship. That was at the same time she requested that all four of Wasilla's department heads resign. Palin described the requests as a loyalty test and allowed all four department heads to retain their positions. But on Jan. 30, 1997, three months after the censorship discussion, Palin informed Emmons and Wasilla's police chief, Irv Stambaugh, that they would be fired. According to the Chicago Tribune, Palin did not list censorship as a reason for Emmons' firing. Palin rehired Emmons the following day. Emmons continued to serve as librarian until August 1999, when the Chicago Tribune reports that she resigned.

So what about that list of books targeted for banning, which according to one widely e-mailed version was taken "from the official minutes of the Wasilla Library Board"? If it was, the library board should take up fortune telling. The list includes the first four Harry Potter books, none of which had been published at the time of the Palin-Emmons conversations. The first wasn't published until 1998. In fact, the list is a simple cut-and-paste job, snatched (complete with typos and the occasional incorrect title) from the Florida Institute of Technology library Web page, which presents the list as "Books banned at one time or another in the United States."

McG, which part of what you posted shows that Palin did not fire the lady, only to rehire her?

I don't care what PALIN says about why she did it - I don't understand how you can think that asking people to describe the motivations behind their own actions gives any sort of real answer as to why they did things. Everyone is going to put themselves in the best possible light every single time...

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

McG, which part of what you posted shows that Palin did not fire the lady, only to rehire her?

I don't care what PALIN says about why she did it - I don't understand how you can think that asking people to describe the motivations behind their own actions gives any sort of real answer as to why they did things. Everyone is going to put themselves in the best possible light every single time...

Cycloptichorn

Bull ****. She did fire her. I don't know where you are getting your information from.

Cycloptichorn
You posted the very quote that says Palin did not fire the lady only to rehire her Cyclop. Don't you read what you write? Palin did not fire her. She intended to, but she relented. McG's post says that Emmons was fired one day and rehired the next. I believe McG's source is incorrect because I don't believe Emmons was ever actually fired. She was threatened with firing yes, but it never actually happened.

McG, which part of what you posted shows that Palin did not fire the lady, only to rehire her?

I don't care what PALIN says about why she did it - I don't understand how you can think that asking people to describe the motivations behind their own actions gives any sort of real answer as to why they did things. Everyone is going to put themselves in the best possible light every single time...

Cycloptichorn

Oh nah, she just asked the librarian how she felt about banning books, and when she didn't get the answer she like, she fired her; only to hear a giant outcry from her constituents, upon which she re-hired her.

Cycloptichorn

In the spirit of Christian forgiveness, perhaps Sarah would now like to nominate Mary Ellen Baker, Wasailla’s librarian (yes, the one she tried to fire) for the I Love My Librarian Award.

Factcheck shows that Palin did indeed fire the librarian. At the same time she fired the Police Chief. She then rehired her the next day and she worked for several years after only to resign on her own.