Brunswick school board candidates offer stances on creationism
(By Ana Ribeiro, Wilmington Star-News, October 10, 2008)
Bible in hand, Monique Weddle defended creationism in a debate in her high school psychology class.
Half that class at West Brunswick High School was for evolution, the other half for creationism, Weddle said. Influenced by her religious surroundings, she said she completely rejected evolution at the time.
Now a senior studying biology at the University of North Carolina Wilmington, Weddle said she has come to accept both.
“You can’t deny something that’s scientifically proven,” Weddle said of evolution, adding, “I still believe very strongly that God created the world, but you can’t disprove evolution.”
There are a lot of scientists who both believe in God and accept that life evolves, said Marcel Van Tuinen, an evolutionary biologist at UNCW and one of Weddle’s former professors. A group of Brunswick County parents showed up at a lecture on evolution at the university last month, concerned about the county school board’s talk of teaching creationism, Van Tuinen said.
But to others in Brunswick County, including two school board candidates, creationism and evolution are competing views that could be debated on scientific terms. The idea, and a discussion that has gone beyond the community, were ignited by Joel Fanti, a Southern Baptist chemical engineer who has a son at West Brunswick High. Fanti suggested at the Sept. 16 school board meeting that creationism be taught side by side with evolution, a thought four board members supported and which has become the object of ridicule on some science Web sites.
District 1 incumbent Ray Gilbert voiced his support for creationism and the related “intelligent design” at a candidates’ forum Tuesday, saying he thinks it should be offered as an alternative theory to evolution, so students could come up with conclusions for themselves. Challenges to evolution should be included in the curriculum, the Libertarian and Christian minister added as he responded to a question from the public at the forum, held at Brunswick Community College’s Odell Williamson Auditorium.
District 2 Republican Catherine Cooke, who presents herself as an active parent and therefore insider in the county school system, said she knows creationism is not to be taught as science, but she’s not against the topic being explored in some form.
“There’s a lot of scientific proof for creation,” Cooke said, without elaborating on that proof. “It’s not one-sided.”
District 4 incumbent Shirley Babson, the school board chairwoman, said she also knows the law doesn’t allow the teaching of creationism as a standard course of study. But she said evolution should be taught as a theory, not as a fact.
However, “when biologists use the term ‘theory,’ it doesn’t mean the same thing as when creationists use it,” said Van Tuinen, a member of UNCW’s Evolution Learning Community, which promotes the community’s understanding of evolution and classes and lectures dealing with the topic.
Evolution is a scientific theory, which means there’s overwhelming support for it, tested and observed in the natural world, the biologist said. Long-term evolution, the kind that transforms animals, is slow and cannot be observed happening in one’s lifetime, but fossils substantiate it, he said. And short-term evolution can be observed in things like viruses mutating and dog breeds that originate through the artificial selection of their breeders.
Any holes in evolution are in the knowledge of how it occurred in certain species " because not all fossils have been found " not in whether evolution occurred, Van Tuinen said. While he can ask a student to test and compare fossils to figure out where they came from, he can’t ask a student to test whether God created him, he said.
Creationism is a religious belief that cannot be tested or substantiated scientifically, he added.
The state allows creationism to be part of an elective or presented as one of many religious beliefs in history class, but not in science class or as a standard course of study.
Although open to the idea of teaching creationism as an elective, other candidates at Tuesday’s forum were firm in stating they wouldn’t try to go beyond that.
Democrat Tom Simmons, who’s running against Babson in District 4 and is interim director of a hands-on science program for students, said he doesn’t see a place for creationism in science class because it’s faith-based. Democrat John Jones and Republican Olaf “Bud” Thorsen, the candidates challenging Gilbert in District 1, said they wouldn’t want to go against the law on the creationism matter.
In the 1987 case Edwards v. Aguillard, the Supreme Court struck down Louisiana’s mandate that evolution could not be taught unless accompanied by creationism, ruling it an unconstitutional endorsement of religion. Other states and districts " including Kansas and Dover, Pa. " have tried to challenge evolution in the curriculum on behalf of “intelligent design” but found themselves forced to give up on the idea.
Jones, a born-again Christian, said he thinks creationism belongs in church or at home. The school board can’t afford a lawsuit regarding the teaching of creationism, said Jones, a veteran educator.
The separation of church and state should be upheld, Thorsen said, adding that he wouldn’t want to force creationism on students and that schools should instead focus on teaching the basics.
“The issue is to teach students how to read and write,” said Thorsen, a former member of the Brunswick County school board.
Democrat Christy Judah, also a longtime educator and Cooke’s adversary in District 2, said the school board should follow the state’s stance on creationism in schools, as well as abide by a strict procedure before trying to point out any errors in the curriculum.
“I’m feeling really uncomfortable with some of these responses,” Judah said of her fellow candidates.