1
   

Armored fish: yet another body blow to evolosers and evoloserism

 
 
Reply Mon 13 Apr, 2015 01:42 am
http://www.icr.org/article/armored-fish-fossils-rewrite-evolutionary/

Quote:
A special set of Australian fish fossils just derailed evolution's long-held story of early fish origins. The remarkable fossils preserved detailed soft tissue body features, including the precise points where muscles attached to the ancient fish's bones. These clues enabled paleontologists to reconstruct the now-extinct fish anatomy. Though expecting something much more primitive-looking, they discovered completely designed, fully-muscled armored fish. Now they have to rewrite the evolutionary bit about how jaws evolved.1.....
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Apr, 2015 01:47 am
@gungasnake,
Dont tell FM . I tried to tell him once that there are holes in evolution but he wouldnt have it . Its the new religion .
farmerman
 
  4  
Reply Mon 13 Apr, 2015 05:01 am
@gungasnake,
for someone who is basically clueless what this information means, I can only assume that this "body blow"story has been fed to you with a Creationist Spoon?
This is a 10 yer old find. The authors reported much more than the details of jaw attachments.
This fish actually showed the first evidence of viviparity, the damn thing had a fetus attachd by an umbilical(jut like shrks) . this pushes back viviparity by 200 million years

The jaw musculature of a placoderm is a mighty interesting thing, its armored, the only thing this critter does is to allow us to see how jaws tth and rticulte. Early stories about plcoderms were made from poor quality fossils from Pennsylvania, Quebec and England, a species known s cnthodes. This Australin specimen appears to be an example of a later species type , called theArthrodires.They were found in a geologic unit called a Lagerstatte which is a sedimentary unit of really fine grained sediments which have preserved the fine detail of the fishies body. Its like the Burgess SHale.

One question, How do the Cretinist Ministries explain the age of the specimens.? It is early Devonian is it not?

Im so glad that your "ministry" can quickly assess the fossill only 8 yers after its early report in NATURE. Science tries to nlysze, Cretinists merely "preach".
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Mon 13 Apr, 2015 05:05 am
@Ionus,
Holes in science are filled in with evidence, Christian beliefs are smashed with evidence
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Apr, 2015 04:08 am
@farmerman,
Christians have been filling in those holes long before science came onto the scene . It will take some time for religion to divorce itself of the past .
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Tue 14 Apr, 2015 04:37 am
@Ionus,
what the hell are you even talking about? What "Christians' were doing all this.

Galileo?

Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Apr, 2015 08:28 am
@farmerman,
Religion was a primitive explanation, the same as science is an intermediate explanation . Early people wanted to know about the world, the priests stepped in and gave reassurance . Isnt reassurance what you and your fan club get from science ? Dont Atheists feel secure because of science ?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Armored fish: yet another body blow to evolosers and evoloserism
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/25/2019 at 06:53:40