@okie,
okie wrote:
...I do not wish to see the country's leadership placed into the hands of an ultra liberal that doesn't appreciate the most valuable aspects of this country, such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Too many people have died for it, to turn it over to somebody that can't even see that.
this isn't a criticism of your comment, but sometimes it seems that a lot of conservatives tend to see
only the things about america that you mentioned.
what i'm getting at is that viewing every little thing through the lens of "struggle" doesn't seem to be any way to live. we all get enough struggle every day just to eat and sleep indoors. like you, i've been around long enough to know the difference. we seem to have come to different conclusions about what makes life good.
i find it difficult to understand why some conservatives believe that they have a monopoly on "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness".
the things that constitute those qualities to "liberals" may be different than yours, but they are every bit as valid. and, as american citizens, liberals (who make up at least 50% of the country) have every bit as much right to pursue those things in the ways that they choose as conservatives do.
to me, that's what america means. "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" for all citizens, not just the ones i agree with.
to be fair, i do come across some liberals who are pretty narrow minded about this stuff, but from the opposite direction.
it just seems a little creepy to me to see the world as one where america must constantly be at war with somebody, anybody.
not all wars are bad and not all wars are necessary.