McCain's VP:

DrewDad wrote:

okie wrote:

I hear what he says through the prism of what I perceive his mindset to be....

In other words, you pre-judge anything you hear about him.

Isn't that what Cyclo accused you of in the first place?

How is that any different then what you guys do with McCain and now Palin? Debra Law has a personal grudge against Palin. I'm guessing it's because of some sort of insecurity about Palin being better looking then her. (you know how women are.) And Cyc has long had it in for any Republican ever since he reached "liberal enlightenment" or whatever he calls it. It's like watching the blind leading the blinder.

McCain talks up Palin as a reformer on 'The View'


NEW YORK (AP) -- Republican presidential candidate John McCain said Friday running mate Sarah Palin has never asked for money for lawmakers' pet projects as Alaska governor when in fact she has sought nearly $200 million in earmarks this year.

McCain made the comments as he appeared on the ABC television show "The View" as part of his effort to woo women to his candidacy.

The Arizona senator said the GOP vice presidential nominee would be good for the country because she would reform government, and specifically cited curbing federal spending for earmarks.

When pressed about Palin's record of requesting and accepting such money for Alaska, McCain ignored the record and said: "Not as governor she didn't."

As questions swirl about whether Palin is qualified to serve, McCain defended her and said he's very happy with his selection of her.

"Se's ignited a spark in America," McCain said, even as he acknowledged that they sometimes have different views.

McCain also used the appearance to defend his TV commercials criticizing his Democratic opponent, Barack Obama. McCain stretches the truth in several of them that have been debunked by fact checkers.

"They're not lies," McCain said.

Some stuff

Cycloptichorn

As for my part of your post, this is untrue. I used to be a much bigger fan of McCain, but then again, he didn't used to be a lying Bushbot like he is today. He had to sell his soul to win the nomination, to the point where he hired Rove, his Proteges, and Tucker Eskew - the guy he once said would share a special place in hell with his Vietnam torturers, for the rumors he spread about McCain in 2000 - to run his campaign for him. And you can see the result of that choice: it's slimy, dirty, and beneath him.

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

As for my part of your post, this is untrue. I used to be a much bigger fan of McCain, but then again, he didn't used to be a lying Bushbot like he is today. He had to sell his soul to win the nomination, to the point where he hired Rove, his Proteges, and Tucker Eskew - the guy he once said would share a special place in hell with his Vietnam torturers, for the rumors he spread about McCain in 2000 - to run his campaign for him. And you can see the result of that choice: it's slimy, dirty, and beneath him.

Cycloptichorn

*sigh* He hasn't hired Rove, last I heard, Rove has a cushy job at the NY Times. Yet this keeps popping up as part of the liberal dogma attacking McCain. Rove = Bush = evil. It's tiresome and old and is pretty much, how did you say it? A bold faced lie.

Rove is an unpaid advisor for his campaign; and his protege Steve Schmidt runs the campaign. Nothing I said was inaccurate in the slightest.

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Rove is an unpaid advisor for his campaign; and his protege Steve Schmidt runs the campaign. Nothing I said was inaccurate in the slightest.

Cycloptichorn

No he isn't. Therfore what you said is indeed inaccurate.

You can yell it from the highest mountain if you wish. Doesn't change the fact that are wrong. Keep lying if you like, liar.

Specifically, which part am I wrong about? I only want to know, in order to save me time when finding articles showing how foolish your last few posts have been. For Rove is an informal advisor to the McCain camp and his protoge Schmidt is running the campaign.
Cycloptichorn

He had to sell his soul to win the nomination, to the point where he hired Rove,

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Specifically, which part am I wrong about? I only want to know, in order to save me time when finding articles showing how foolish your last few posts have been. For Rove is an informal advisor to the McCain camp and his protoge Schmidt is running the campaign.
Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

He had to sell his soul to win the nomination, to the point where he hired Rove,

So, we have gone from that to now being an "an informal advisor to the McCain camp" which is still a lie. Both Rove and McCain are on record as saying Rove is not advising the McCain campaign so happy digging.

In private, Rove speaks regularly with the McCain campaign, where his former protégé Steve Schmidt is now the manager. He’s also dialed in at the Republican National Committee, run by Mike Duncan, another former aide. And he still lunches two or three times a month with President Bush.

McGentrix wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Specifically, which part am I wrong about? I only want to know, in order to save me time when finding articles showing how foolish your last few posts have been. For Rove is an informal advisor to the McCain camp and his protoge Schmidt is running the campaign.
Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

He had to sell his soul to win the nomination, to the point where he hired Rove,

So, we have gone from that to now being an "an informal advisor to the McCain camp" which is still a lie. Both Rove and McCain are on record as saying Rove is not advising the McCain campaign so happy digging.

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1835917,00.html?xid=rss-topstories

Quote:

In private, Rove speaks regularly with the McCain campaign, where his former protégé Steve Schmidt is now the manager. He’s also dialed in at the Republican National Committee, run by Mike Duncan, another former aide. And he still lunches two or three times a month with President Bush.

30 seconds of googling, you maroon. Not even a whole minute.

The two are on record as not being connected, b/c Rove organizes outside groups, and by law they are not supposed to coordinate messages. Of course, they do anyways, and nothing will happen to McCain, because the Republican-ran FEC doesn't give a **** about the rules.

You're a moron if you believe even a third of the **** you spout, McG. You were embarrassed badly this week on the Palin rape-kit issue; why keep making yourself look foolish like this?

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

McGentrix wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Specifically, which part am I wrong about? I only want to know, in order to save me time when finding articles showing how foolish your last few posts have been. For Rove is an informal advisor to the McCain camp and his protoge Schmidt is running the campaign.
Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

He had to sell his soul to win the nomination, to the point where he hired Rove,

So, we have gone from that to now being an "an informal advisor to the McCain camp" which is still a lie. Both Rove and McCain are on record as saying Rove is not advising the McCain campaign so happy digging.

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1835917,00.html?xid=rss-topstories

Quote:

In private, Rove speaks regularly with the McCain campaign, where his former protégé Steve Schmidt is now the manager. He’s also dialed in at the Republican National Committee, run by Mike Duncan, another former aide. And he still lunches two or three times a month with President Bush.

30 seconds of googling, you maroon. Not even a whole minute.

The two are on record as not being connected, b/c Rove organizes outside groups, and by law they are not supposed to coordinate messages. Of course, they do anyways, and nothing will happen to McCain, because the Republican-ran FEC doesn't give a **** about the rules.

You're a moron if you believe even a third of the **** you spout, McG. You were embarrassed badly this week on the Palin rape-kit issue; why keep making yourself look foolish like this?

Cycloptichorn

That's your evidence? A reporter for Time magazine says he does? You'll have to do better then that liar.