1
   

CHILD PORN IMMORAL IF NO REAL CHILDREN INVOLVED ?

 
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jul, 2008 10:29 am
OK, all wise ones
OK all wise ones. Answer this question.

Statistics demonstrate that children, both boys and girls, but especially boys, that are sexually abused in their childhood often repeat the behavior of their abusers in their adulthood, often against their own children.

Why does this repeat of child sexual violence occur?

BBB
0 Replies
 
agrote
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jul, 2008 10:38 am
Which statistics demonstrate this?
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jul, 2008 11:05 am
agrote
agrote wrote:
Which statistics demonstrate this?


Agrote, Were you sexually abused as a child?

One example:

Exploring the Relationship Between Childhood Sexual Abuse and Adult Sexual Perpetration
Elisa Romano and Rayleen V. De Luca
Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2

Abstract: Empirical findings indicate that many adult sexual offenders experienced sexual abuse during childhood. It has been suggested that characteristics of offenders' sexual perpetrating behaviors may resemble their own victimization experiences, although there has been minimal empirical investigation in this area. The purpose of the present study was to provide preliminary data on the relationship between childhood sexual abuse and characteristics of sexual offending behavior. A sample of adult male sexual offenders with histories of sexual abuse completed the Sexual Victimization Survey as well as a measure on their sexual offenses. Such characteristics as the nature of sexual activities, duration and frequency of experiences, and age and relationship of participants were examined. Results showed trends in the hypothesized direction and revealed a variety of similarities between childhood sexual abuse and adult sexual perpetration. Findings of this exploratory study suggest the importance of addressing the nature of victimization in the treatment of sexually abused boys and offenders with histories of sexual abuse.

Another excellent report:
http://www.sasian.org/pdf/whenchildrenact.pdf
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jul, 2008 12:27 pm
agrote wrote:
Stanta, I don't know what "nested quote" means.


I have not, of course, ever heard of a member named Stanta . . . however, on the assumption (based on the reference to "nested quote") that you are referring to me, i would just point out that no evidence of your ignorance is likely to surprise me.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jul, 2008 04:28 pm
Re: OK, all wise ones
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
OK all wise ones. Answer this question.

Statistics demonstrate that children, both boys and girls, but especially boys,
that are sexually abused in their childhood often repeat the behavior
of their abusers in their adulthood, often against their own children.

Why does this repeat of child sexual violence occur?

BBB

I am not sure whether the answer that I have to offer
is responsive or not, because my efforts to get a definition
of "child abuse" as used within the discussion of these threads, have been futile.

Do we define all sexual activity of children as being abusive ?
Including children among themselves ?
I believe that some people do.

I don 't see it that way.
To my mind, "child abuse" means rape, sodomy,
or something very close to it, NOT the technical legal definitions
whereby a child who actively and eagerly desires to participate
is deemed not to consent, because it is impossible for her or him to consent.

I have posted this before; forgive my redundance.
Among the happy experiences of my life
are 2 occasions, when I was 11 years old.
I consider these to have been "getting lucky" not abusive.
I am glad that thay r part of my life experience.

Something over half a century ago,
when I was 11, I was on a bus from Los Angeles to Phoenix, where I lived,
a trip of several hours, begun in the evening.
A girl who identified herself as being 17 sat next to me.
She successfully made overtures of amour,
and we disembarked at a rest stop, and used a nearby motel;
a classic one nite stand.

That same year, another girl in her early 20s was similarly motivated,
to my delight and delust. I value these memories.


However, I was a child myself, the last time that I entertained
any such notions or desires; contrary to the mental experience of Agrote,
I have no thoughts nor desires toward children nor teenagers.

On a non-sexual basis, on a platonic basis, I am not a snob
and I consider myself to be approachable by by anyone
and I have shown equal respect to everyone regardless of gender or age.
I prefer to respond to everyone as an individual.

U asked about violence.
These incidents were eminently peaceful.
We got there first, long before the frase "make love not war" became popular.


Again, if this is not responsive
to your question, BBB, I express my regrets.

U asked:
" Why does this repeat of child sexual violence occur? "
It seems to me that this is not limited to matters of sex, nor violence.
I am put in mind of the radio personality, Don Imus,
who described his childhood, during which his father was a nasty drunk,
preferring Scotch, who knocked Imus around for however many years.
Accordingly, Imus said that he despised and detested his father
(and probably did not like getting knocked around much either).
He said that he vowed that he 'd never drink
and that he 'd ESPECIALLY not drink Scotch.
After growing into adulthood, he became an alcoholic whose drink of choice was Scotch.

My point is that there appears to be something in the subconscious mind
that drives children to emulate parental behavior. In the early 1990s,
a family in upstate NY befriended me, whose father I observed to be
very, very rude to his 3 boys. He embarassed them in public.
I remember advising the oldest boy (who confided to me that he despised his father)
to be very actively careful, when he 'd become a father to avoid
replicating the offensive behavior; that he needs to remember how it feels.

As I think of this, I remember a similar incident, years before
on my graduation day from the 9th grade in school.
I liked my next door neighbors, some Italians.
Their oldest son Joe was about my age, and he befriended me.
I liked their mother; young -- she looked Irish slim, with reddish hair
and her daughter was an identical duplicate of her; nice.
The mother, Angie, invited me (insistently) to join her and Joe
in a restaurant for celebration of the graduation.
With some doubts, I accepted.
In my presence,
Angie demanded something of her son that tended to humiliate him,
insulted his intelligence, and put him in an awkward position,
in front of his friend (ME). Not wishing to be embarassed, he resisted.
Angie then asked my opinion, apparently expecting my support.
I argued successfully in his defense (at some length)
that he shud not be humiliated in public, in front of me.
Angie understood my reasoning and agreed, to Joe 's relief.

Upon reflection, Angie then related to us
as how her mother had done the same thing to HER in childhood,
and she felt the pain of embarassment which she had on that day
endeavored to perpetrate upon Joe.


The moral of the story is:
parents shud be careful of what thay imprint upon
their children 's subconscious minds and that is NOT
limited to sex nor to violence.

David
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Jul, 2008 04:42 pm
Re: OK, all wise ones
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
OK all wise ones. Answer this question.

Statistics demonstrate that children, both boys and girls, but especially boys, that are sexually abused in their childhood often repeat the behavior of their abusers in their adulthood, often against their own children.

Why does this repeat of child sexual violence occur?

BBB


because early sexuality alters sexual functioning for life in many if not most cases. Those who need abnormal stimulation to receive sexual gratification will often eventually seak out that stimulus even if they know that the other person may be harmed in the process. There are many reasons those who were abused say that they abuse others; there is nothing wrong with what that are doing...they are owed because of what was done to them.....they need abnormal sex like an adict needs his drug thus they can't help themselves......they did not realize what they were doing.....basically sexual transgression is a learned behaviour and if one knows that they can get what they want/need by way of transgression but can't from any other means then they will do it even if they think it is wrong to do so. The current batch of child protection advocates have only one solution, punish those who abuse so harshly that none will abuse. Like that works so well with similar problems such as drugs and alcohol. This problem does not get solved until we are ready to give those with sexual kinks enough freedom that they can work though their kinks without hurting those who don't want to be hurt (as apposed to a masochist who wants to be hurt).
0 Replies
 
agrote
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jul, 2008 04:16 am
Re: agrote
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
agrote wrote:
Which statistics demonstrate this?


Agrote, Were you sexually abused as a child?
Quote:


No. But I'm not a child abuser, so this doesn't disprove your hypothesis that people who have been abused in childhood are more likely to commit similar abuse as adults. I find this hypothesis quite plausible, but some people also assume that abuse during childhood leads to an adult sexual interest in children (as opposed to an adult tendency to abuse children).

I don't understood how that could happen... why would being molested during childhood make you want to have sex with children when you grow up? And many of the people here are counterexamples to the latter hypothesis: I wasn't abused as a child or young adolescent, but I have a sexual interest in young adolescents; some of the other posters here were abused as children, but they have no sexual interest in children.

So I find cycles of abuse plausible. I don't find cycles of sexual attraction plausible... if anything, being abused as a child should make you sexually attracted to older men, not younger children. Being molested as a child may make you prone to molest children as an adult, but child molestors are not necessarily paedophiles. There are various reasons why somebody might choose to abuse a child: sadistic tendencies, lack of success with adults... paedophilia is only one of those reasons (although I would imagine it is the most common reason for why people abuse children).
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jul, 2008 06:05 am
Re: agrote
agrote wrote:
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
agrote wrote:
Which statistics demonstrate this?


Agrote, Were you sexually abused as a child?
Quote:


No. But I'm not a child abuser, so this doesn't disprove your hypothesis that people who have been abused in childhood are more likely to commit similar abuse as adults. I find this hypothesis quite plausible, but some people also assume that abuse during childhood leads to an adult sexual interest in children (as opposed to an adult tendency to abuse children).

I don't understood how that could happen... why would being molested during childhood make you want to have sex with children when you grow up? And many of the people here are counterexamples to the latter hypothesis: I wasn't abused as a child or young adolescent, but I have a sexual interest in young adolescents; some of the other posters here were abused as children, but they have no sexual interest in children.

So I find cycles of abuse plausible. I don't find cycles of sexual attraction plausible... if anything, being abused as a child should make you sexually attracted to older men, not younger children. Being molested as a child may make you prone to molest children as an adult, but child molestors are not necessarily paedophiles. There are various reasons why somebody might choose to abuse a child: sadistic tendencies, lack of success with adults... paedophilia is only one of those reasons (although I would imagine it is the most common reason for why people abuse children).

From your picture,
u don 't appear to be far from adolescence, yourself.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jul, 2008 08:32 am
OmSigDAVID
OmSigDAVID, your early sexual experience causes me to wonder about more than male pedophiles. How widespread is female pedophilia? Why are there legal reaction differences toward male and female pedophiles?
---BBB
------------------------------------------------------------

Clinical characteristics and treatment response to SSRI in a female pedophile
Author(s) CHOW Eva W. C. ; CHOY Alberto L. ;

Abstract

Although much investigation has been done with male sex offenders, there have been few studies on female sex offenders. Female sex offenders have been reported as having a high incidence of psychiatric disorders, but female paraphilics were rarely described. The literature on the treatment of female sex offenders is also limited and treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) has not been reported. This paper presents the case of a woman with DSM-IV pedophilia. Her clinical characteristics, her offense history, and her positive response to treatment with sertraline (a SSRI) are described. This case adds to the limited literature on female pedophiles and suggests that SSRIs may be an effective treatment for paraphilic disorders in female sex offenders.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

This article opines that boys "getting lucky" ain't so lucky after all:

This isn't 'getting lucky'
Experts: Boys sexually abused by women have problems later
Print this Article Email this Article Text Size: A | A | A

By Scott Smith
Record Staff Writer
August 15, 2005 6:00 AM
Adult females seeking underage boys for sex -- a crime seemingly on the rise -- isn't really a new phenomenon.

What's new is the number of middle-class, middle-aged women gaining the public's attention when they are suspected of having sexual relations with male youths.

Recent notoriety from several shocking cases across the nation and a more savvy generation of young people have led to more reported cases where women are the aggressors and boys, the victims, say criminologists and psychologists.

"Boys are being informed that this is not getting lucky," said Douglas Weiss, a Colorado-based counselor and author. "It's getting abused."

San Joaquin County has seen two such cases like this unfold this year.

A 39-year-old a stay-at-home mom from Manteca was charged last Monday with oral copulation of a minor after she allegedly performed oral sex on two 17-year-old boys. She was also charged with contributing to the delinquency of six children. Cindy Farmanian, the wife of a Tracy police lieutenant, pleaded not guilty to the charges and awaits trial.

Bear Creek High School teacher Kim Alexander, 39, pleaded guilty in April to misdemeanor charges of molestation and engaging in a lewd act with a minor. The boy's mother caught the 15-year-old with romantic letters the teacher wrote. Alexander lost her teaching credentials and was ordered to spend 45 days in jail.

Weiss said there are parallels between male and women pedophiles. Women often befriend vulnerable boys and touch them and fuss over them to gain their acceptance.

They rationalize their actions, saying they are encouraging the boy and trying to love him, he said.

Contrary to popular belief, boys who are victims of female pedophiles do feel like sexual objects and later have trouble associating sex with love, leading to abnormal sexual behavior later in life, said Weiss, author of "She Has A Secret: Understanding Female Sexual Addiction."

"They put a big bullet in the boy's soul," said Weiss, who said he was such a victim at 16. "He's going to try to find some medicine, like drugs, alcohol or sex."

Fewer than 2 percent of San Joaquin County's 1,768 registered sexual offenders are women, according to data from the California Department of Justice.

Phyllis Gerstenfeld, a criminology professor at California State University, Stanislaus, said there has been little research on women pedophiles, adding that such crimes probably occur more often than reported.

Gerstenfeld said cases of men who have sex with a underage girl are more frequently reported and prosecuted out of concerns the girl could become pregnant. Gerstenfled said the common belief is that girls need to be protected, while sexual activity for boys is thought to be appropriate.

"I think people just have the belief that 'boys will be boys,' " she said.

Sgt. Steve Van Meter of the San Joaquin County Sheriff's Office said he encourages parents to confront their children if they suspect suspicious behavior. Chances are a child will become the victim of somebody they know, rather than a stranger, he said.

"People should ask their children to tell them about any situation that makes them feel uncomfortable, whether it's a teacher or any other person in a position of trust," Van Meter said.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jul, 2008 08:43 am
Lots of reports of female teachers having sex with male students recently.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jul, 2008 10:03 am
Re: OmSigDAVID
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:


Quote:
OmSigDAVID, your early sexual experience
causes me to wonder about more than male pedophiles.
How widespread is female pedophilia?

I have no way of knowing.
I suspect that it is a lot less prevalent than male pedophilia.


Quote:
Why are there legal reaction differences toward male and female pedophiles?
---BBB

My answer is because girls are harmed by such an experience,
and boys are not, judging by my personal experience,
which was that sexual pleasure was the same at age 11 as during my adult years.
Girls are more delicate than boys, and there may be danger of pregnancy.
Insofar as this is concerned, the difference between girls and boys
is like the difference of night and day.

I am at a loss to understand the statement
hereinbelow about putting "a big bullet in the boy's soul".
He shoud have explained what he meant and demonstrated a causal relationship.
His unsupported allegation of emotional harm
leaves open the question of the ratio of guys whose memories take MY
point of vu, as distinct from HIS vu point.

My soul felt a lot better as a result of each of those encounters
than it wud have without them.
I was content in my childhood, but I found it to include
long and broad times of boredom. The young ladies (17 and 23?)
helped to alleviate that boredom. Thay have my gratitude.
If I had my life to live over, with my current knowledge,
I certainly woud wish to include those experiences, and to have had MORE
of them. I did not find sexuality with older girls to be distinct in principle,
nor distinct in its inherent nature from sexuality with girls of my own age.
Basic sexuality has a certain FUNgibility to it, whether I was young or old.
I have never felt impelled to do anything out of the ordinary.

I certainly did not stop to consider any question of "abuse"
on either of these occasions, but if I had,
my attitude surely woud have been "if this be abuse, let us make the most of it".
I have had no reason to change my mind about that; i.e., no ill effects,
during many years and decades since.

Quote:

------------------------------------------------------------

Clinical characteristics and treatment response to SSRI in a female pedophile
Author(s) CHOW Eva W. C. ; CHOY Alberto L. ;

Abstract

Although much investigation has been done with male sex offenders, there have been few studies on female sex offenders. Female sex offenders have been reported as having a high incidence of psychiatric disorders, but female paraphilics were rarely described. The literature on the treatment of female sex offenders is also limited and treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) has not been reported. This paper presents the case of a woman with DSM-IV pedophilia. Her clinical characteristics, her offense history, and her positive response to treatment with sertraline (a SSRI) are described. This case adds to the limited literature on female pedophiles and suggests that SSRIs may be an effective treatment for paraphilic disorders in female sex offenders.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

This article opines that boys "getting lucky" ain't so lucky after all:

This isn't 'getting lucky'
Experts: Boys sexually abused by women have problems later
Print this Article Email this Article Text Size: A | A | A

By Scott Smith
Record Staff Writer
August 15, 2005 6:00 AM
Adult females seeking underage boys for sex -- a crime seemingly on the rise -- isn't really a new phenomenon.

What's new is the number of middle-class, middle-aged women gaining the public's attention when they are suspected of having sexual relations with male youths.

Recent notoriety from several shocking cases across the nation and a more savvy generation of young people have led to more reported cases where women are the aggressors and boys, the victims, say criminologists and psychologists.

"Boys are being informed that this is not getting lucky," said Douglas Weiss, a Colorado-based counselor and author. "It's getting abused."

San Joaquin County has seen two such cases like this unfold this year.

A 39-year-old a stay-at-home mom from Manteca was charged last Monday with oral copulation of a minor after she allegedly performed oral sex on two 17-year-old[ ?? ] boys. She was also charged with contributing to the delinquency of six children. Cindy Farmanian, the wife of a Tracy police lieutenant, pleaded not guilty to the charges and awaits trial.

Bear Creek High School teacher Kim Alexander, 39, pleaded guilty in April to misdemeanor charges of molestation and engaging in a lewd act with a minor. The boy's mother caught the 15-year-old with romantic letters the teacher wrote. Alexander lost her teaching credentials and was ordered to spend 45 days in jail.

Weiss said there are parallels between male and women pedophiles. Women often befriend vulnerable boys and touch them and fuss over them to gain their acceptance.

They rationalize their actions, saying they are encouraging the boy and trying to love him, he said.

Contrary to popular belief, boys who are victims of female pedophiles do feel like sexual objects and later have trouble associating sex with love, leading to abnormal sexual behavior later in life, said Weiss, author of "She Has A Secret: Understanding Female Sexual Addiction."

"They put a big bullet in the boy's soul," said Weiss, who said he was such a victim at 16. "He's going to try to find some medicine, like drugs, alcohol or sex."

Fewer than 2 percent of San Joaquin County's 1,768 registered sexual offenders are women, according to data from the California Department of Justice.

Phyllis Gerstenfeld, a criminology professor at California State University, Stanislaus, said there has been little research on women pedophiles, adding that such crimes probably occur more often than reported.

Gerstenfeld said cases of men who have sex with a underage girl are more frequently reported and prosecuted out of concerns the girl could become pregnant. Gerstenfled said the common belief
is that girls need to be protected,
while sexual activity for boys
is thought to be appropriate
.

"I think people just have the belief that 'boys will be boys,' " she said.

Sgt. Steve Van Meter of the San Joaquin County Sheriff's Office said he encourages parents to confront their children if they suspect suspicious behavior. Chances are a child will become the victim of somebody they know, rather than a stranger, he said.

"People should ask their children to tell them about any situation that makes them feel uncomfortable, whether it's a teacher or any other person in a position of trust," Van Meter said.

My spent my childhood (from age 8) in a libertarian environment,
a lot of it being alone most of the day, and hence autonomous.
My parents were not confrontational (there was no reason for confrontation),
but if my mother had interfered as the mother in the account hereinabove,
I 'd have been very defensive of the chick, and indignantly resentful of
any intrusion upon our privacy.

In a way, that happened; sort of, in my family. My cousin Norma caught
her son, Tommy (I guess around 15) in bed with his girlfriend of about the same age.
Norma threw the girlfriend out. Tommy was said to have found it very humorous.

When Norma told me about it, I thought that she shoud have respected
his privacy; (tho I must admit that problems of pregnancy might have arisen,
and thay are of legitimate concern).




David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jul, 2008 10:06 am
DrewDad wrote:
Lots of reports of female teachers having sex with male students recently.

We didn 't have enuf of them when I was in school.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jul, 2008 10:20 am
OmSigDAVID
OmSigDAVID, I'm puzzled by your response.

You state the difference is that girls are at risk of becoming pregnant.

Why are you not concerned about boys becoming fathers of the pregnant girl's child?

I know its customary that the female bear all of the responsibility of an out of wedlock pregnancy, but haven't we evolved beyond that today?
Guess not.

BBB
0 Replies
 
agrote
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jul, 2008 10:20 am
Re: agrote
OmSigDAVID wrote:
From your picture,
u don 't appear to be far from adolescence, yourself.


How is this relevant?

I'm 21 - I'm an adult.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jul, 2008 10:23 am
Re: OmSigDAVID
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
OmSigDAVID, I'm puzzled by your response.

You state the difference is that girls are at risk of becoming pregnant.

Why are you not concerned about boys becoming fathers of the pregnant girl's child?

I know its customary that the female bear all of the responsibility of an out of wedlock pregnancy, but haven't we evolved beyond that today?
Guess not.

BBB

Your point is well taken;
however, see the final paragraf of my responsive post to u.




David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jul, 2008 10:30 am
Re: agrote
agrote wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
From your picture,
u don 't appear to be far from adolescence, yourself.


How is this relevant?

I'm 21 - I'm an adult.

U expressed sexual interests in adolescents.
U r only just barely out of adolescence yourself.

That is how it is relevant.



Some woud deem it worse if u were a dirty old man.
In any case, u have indicated that u r fully in compliance with applicable law.




David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jul, 2008 10:36 am
Re: OmSigDAVID
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
OmSigDAVID, I'm puzzled by your response.

You state the difference is that girls are at risk of becoming pregnant.

Why are you not concerned about boys becoming fathers of the pregnant girl's child?

I know its customary that the female bear all of the responsibility of an out of wedlock pregnancy,
but haven't we evolved beyond that today?
Guess not.

BBB

I shoud add that boys' mentalities are a lot more ROBUST
in matters of sexuality than r young girls.

(speaking as a former boy)


David
0 Replies
 
agrote
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jul, 2008 11:11 am
Re: agrote
OmSigDAVID wrote:
agrote wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
From your picture,
u don 't appear to be far from adolescence, yourself.


How is this relevant?

I'm 21 - I'm an adult.

U expressed sexual interests in adolescents.
U r only just barely out of adolescence yourself.

That is how it is relevant.


Relevant to what?

When do you think adolescence ends?

Quote:
Some woud deem it worse if u were a dirty old man.


And they'd be wrong to deem it so.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jul, 2008 12:02 pm
Re: agrote
agrote wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
agrote wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
From your picture,
u don 't appear to be far from adolescence, yourself.


How is this relevant?

I'm 21 - I'm an adult.

U expressed sexual interests in adolescents.
U r only just barely out of adolescence yourself.

That is how it is relevant.


Quote:
Relevant to what?

When do you think adolescence ends?

I suppose that adolescence is the time between childhood and adulthood.
I don 't have a strict definition for it in my mind.
I don 't ofen find a need to define it.




Quote:
Some woud deem it worse if u were a dirty old man.


And they'd be wrong to deem it so.

It 'd be much worse, much more gross, if a fat ugly old man like me
were getting it on with a 16 year old girl, than if a pleasant young lad
like yourself were to do so. I 'm sure the chick 'd think so.

Remember how bad it looked
with Anna Nicole Smith and that old man in the wheelchair,
probably in his 90s ?

Of course, I 'm sure that she looked upon it as work,
as distinct from social pleasure, unless he were a hell of a good conversationalist.


David
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jul, 2008 12:03 pm
Re: OmSigDAVID
OmSigDAVID wrote:
I shoud add that boys' mentalities are a lot more ROBUST
in matters of sexuality than r young girls.

(speaking as a former boy)

Er.... are you saying that you're now a girl? Shocked

How would you know if boys' mentalities are more robust, if you're only going by personal experience?

In my experience, women are better able to handle tragedy than men. Which says nothing about children.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/16/2024 at 10:50:54