@OmSigDAVID,
Text is never child pornography (in US law anyway.) 'Child pornography' has a specific legal definition and is,
"(8) “child pornography” means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where—
(A)
the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B)
such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(C)
such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2256
No text-only writing about anything should EVER be censored by law. Wann a burn it more power to ya, but don't you even think about censoring it (yes, that's a joke hehe.)
Which all the vitriol over kids n sex, there's fallout as with sites not wanting to give the impression of toelrating it and such.