Finn dAbuzz wrote:Diest TKO wrote:Have I said that YOU can't or shouldn't say it?
Strawman, Finn.
T
K
O
You have claimed to "consistently" argue that the Pledge be "stopped."
Why is "consistantly" and "stopped" in quotes?
I have not. I've only said that it doesn't mean anything to me anymore because I don't think the nation honored in the pledge is the one we live in. I think when the pledge was amended to include "under god" into it, it became cheap. Cheap in that, if we are so easily swayed by the fear of a godless foreign power that we will become so pathetically reactionary, it's just not made of stone; no fortitude.
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
Or am I wrong?
Quite often. It's your Modus Operandi.
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
What is it with you guys that you can't resist bleating "Strawman!"
What is it with you guys that you can't resist making scarecrows?
A strawman by definition is what you have constructed here. You have mischaracterized what I've said, and argued against something I have not said. That's straw Finn. If you're used to hearing it, perhaps it's you who is the lowest common denominator; maybe you should revist your debate style/template if you hate hearing it so much.
T
K
O
