0
   

Obama's electability

 
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 03:17 pm
The media hasn't made much mention of the fact that he is a serial adulterer, who left his permanently disabled wife (who was faithful to him while he was a POW for years) for a 19-year old heiress who he was having an affair with. I'd like to see a little more written about that. Wouldn't you, Fox?

After all, it's indicative of his morality and judgment, that he would betray those who stood by him during his toughest times.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
rabel22
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 03:27 pm
Leave it up to someone like Cyclo to complain about the swiftboating of Kerry and than start his B. S. spin about Mc Cain. Ill bet Cyclo was a republican at one time. He certainly sounds like one.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 03:32 pm
rabel22 wrote:
Leave it up to someone like Cyclo to complain about the swiftboating of Kerry and than start his B. S. spin about Mc Cain. Ill bet Cyclo was a republican at one time. He certainly sounds like one.


That's BS about McCain?

The whole point of the 'swift-boat' criticisms, were that these people had had much more complimentary things to say in the past, before they got paid to say negative things... to my knowledge, nobody has contradicted this factual account about Mccain's infidelity.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 03:40 pm
Do you doubt that McCain is a sleaze. See http://www.realchange.org/mccain.htm
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 07:26 pm
Advocate wrote:
Do you doubt that McCain is a sleaze. See http://www.realchange.org/mccain.htm


That's it? How underwhelming.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 09:40 pm
Where have we seen this pattern before? The thread title suggests the topic is Obama's electability, not McCain's. But the only thing these folks have to defend Obama is to bash McCain? Sigh. I really hoped the Democrats would be able to do better this time, but they again seem to set the bar so low for their candidates. This last series of posts suggest that all they seem to require of their candidate is that they can say he isn't worse than somebody else even if they have to make something up.

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/Shelton_C20070904.jpg
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 06:16 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
The media hasn't made much mention of the fact that he is a serial adulterer, who left his permanently disabled wife (who was faithful to him while he was a POW for years) for a 19-year old heiress who he was having an affair with. I'd like to see a little more written about that. Wouldn't you, Fox?

After all, it's indicative of his morality and judgment, that he would betray those who stood by him during his toughest times.

Cycloptichorn


Serial Adulterer???? Is that what concerns you now?

Did it bother you that Clinton is a serial adulterer? Does it bother you that Obama ignores his mothers heritage? How must she feel?

Apparently, you can not debate issues, so you go to the trash bin to see what you can find. How typical! Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 06:25 am
woiyo wrote:
Apparently, you can not debate issues
Laughing
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 07:04 am
I think Obama electability is about the same as McCain going polls on the subject.

General Election: McCain vs. Obama



0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 08:49 am
woiyo wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
The media hasn't made much mention of the fact that he is a serial adulterer, who left his permanently disabled wife (who was faithful to him while he was a POW for years) for a 19-year old heiress who he was having an affair with. I'd like to see a little more written about that. Wouldn't you, Fox?

After all, it's indicative of his morality and judgment, that he would betray those who stood by him during his toughest times.

Cycloptichorn


Serial Adulterer???? Is that what concerns you now?


Well, hell. If people are insistent on going on and on about peoples' associations and past events, it seems relevant, don't you think?

Quote:
Did it bother you that Clinton is a serial adulterer?


Yes; it's a security risk.

Quote:
Does it bother you that Obama ignores his mothers heritage? How must she feel?


She's dead. So I don't think she feels much of anything about the subject. I suspect she'd be proud of her son at this moment.

Quote:
Apparently, you can not debate issues, so you go to the trash bin to see what you can find. How typical! Rolling Eyes


Woiyo, I'm willing to debate any issue with you, any time. Eager to do so.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 08:51 am
Quote:
Does it bother you that Obama ignores his mothers heritage? How must she feel?


She's dead. So I don't think she feels much of anything about the subject. I suspect she'd be proud of her son at this moment.


Well how about Grandma!
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 08:58 am
What about her? I'm sure she's incredibly proud of Obama.

I don't see what you're getting at here. I suspect it's a form of tawdry race-baiting...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 09:05 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
What about her? I'm sure she's incredibly proud of Obama.

I don't see what you're getting at here. I suspect it's a form of tawdry race-baiting...

Cycloptichorn


You brought up a irrelevant part of McCains life and questioned his "loyalty. The same can be said for Obama and how he has handled "things" in his personal life.

As far as I know, race is not an issue to me. Seems it matters to you though.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 11:13 am
Obama will not get elected.

Those that supported Senator Clinton will cross the line and support McCain in mass.

NObama.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 11:15 am
Assertions are not especially convincing. Especially in the face of polling data and massive advantage for the Dems.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 11:22 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Assertions are not especially convincing. Especially in the face of polling data and massive advantage for the Dems.

Cycloptichorn


I'll remember your comment next time you voice your opinion. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 11:29 am
woiyo wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Assertions are not especially convincing. Especially in the face of polling data and massive advantage for the Dems.

Cycloptichorn


I'll remember your comment next time you voice your opinion. Rolling Eyes


By all means, please do. It's entirely appropriate to ask one to explain the reasoning behind their opinions.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 11:39 am
By all means, please explain the reasoning behind your opinions.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 11:42 am
H2O_MAN wrote:
By all means, please explain the reasoning behind your opinions.


If you can be more specific as to which ones, I would be more then happy to do so.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jun, 2008 11:45 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
H2O_MAN wrote:
By all means, please explain the reasoning behind your opinions.


If you can be more specific as to which ones, I would be more then happy to do so.


I'm just not convinced that you would be honest.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/10/2025 at 02:27:12