9
   

The Case Against John McCain

 
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jun, 2008 02:45 pm
Quote:
How war hero John McCain betrayed the Vietnamese peasant who saved his life

Last updated at 01:10 23 March 2008


In all the tales of wartime courage peppering John McCain's presidential campaign trail, perhaps the most outstanding example of selfless heroism involves not the candidate but a humble Vietnamese peasant.

On October 26, 1967, Mai Van On ran from the safety of a bomb shelter at the height of an air raid and swam out into the lake where Lieutenant Commander McCain was drowning, tangled in his parachute cord after ejecting when his Skyhawk bomber was hit by a missile.

In an extraordinary act of compassion at a time when Vietnamese citizens were being killed by US aerial bombardments, he pulled a barely conscious McCain to the lake surface and, with the help of a neighbour, dragged him towards the shore.

Nearly three decades later, a Vietnamese government commission confirmed he was indeed the rescuer and, in a 1996 meeting in Hanoi, McCain embraced and thanked Mr On and presented him with a Senate memento.

From that brief encounter to his death at the age of 88 two years ago, Mr On never heard from the senator again, and three years after their meeting, McCain published an autobiography that makes no mention of his apparent debt to Mr On.

It is a snub Mr On took to his death.

His widow, Bui Thi Lien, 71, said: ?In his last years, my husband was very sad sometimes.

He would say, 'Mr McCain has forgotten me.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-542277/How-war-hero-John-McCain-betrayed-Vietnamese-peasant-saved-life.html

0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jun, 2008 02:57 pm
Quote:


John McCain, veteran war hero: yes. But a descendant of Robert the Bruce? Baloney

Of all the claims in support of John McCain's bid for the White House, perhaps none is quite as grand as this. As he arrived in London yesterday, the publishers of his new book insisted the Republican senator's family was descended from the Scottish king, Robert the Bruce.

For a veteran war hero staking his presidential campaign on military credentials, an ancestral link to a warrior who overcame the English to reclaim Scottish independence in 1314 has obvious appeal. But according to experts, the story may be no more than that. Asked by the Guardian to investigate McCain's family history, genealogists and medieval historians described the link to Robert the Bruce as "wonderful fiction" and "baloney".

The McCain link to Scotland was first mooted several years ago, but resurfaced this week on the eve of his trip to the UK, when Gibson Square, the publishers behind the senator's book, Hard Call, announced that "John McCain's family is of Scottish-Irish descent and related to the Scottish king, Robert the Bruce, on his mother's side".

...

Durie added that despite his romantic reputation, Robert the Bruce was "an absolute scoundrel".

"The first thing he did after taking power was destroy Stirling castle and he was a self-serving, vainglorious opportunist who was determined to be king at any cost," he said.

[in this, there is a strong similarity]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/mar/21/johnmccain.uselections2008


0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 06:04 am
JTT wrote:
Quote:
How war hero John McCain betrayed the Vietnamese peasant who saved his life

Last updated at 01:10 23 March 2008


In all the tales of wartime courage peppering John McCain's presidential campaign trail, perhaps the most outstanding example of selfless heroism involves not the candidate but a humble Vietnamese peasant.

On October 26, 1967, Mai Van On ran from the safety of a bomb shelter at the height of an air raid and swam out into the lake where Lieutenant Commander McCain was drowning, tangled in his parachute cord after ejecting when his Skyhawk bomber was hit by a missile.

In an extraordinary act of compassion at a time when Vietnamese citizens were being killed by US aerial bombardments, he pulled a barely conscious McCain to the lake surface and, with the help of a neighbour, dragged him towards the shore.

Nearly three decades later, a Vietnamese government commission confirmed he was indeed the rescuer and, in a 1996 meeting in Hanoi, McCain embraced and thanked Mr On and presented him with a Senate memento.

From that brief encounter to his death at the age of 88 two years ago, Mr On never heard from the senator again, and three years after their meeting, McCain published an autobiography that makes no mention of his apparent debt to Mr On.

It is a snub Mr On took to his death.

His widow, Bui Thi Lien, 71, said: ?In his last years, my husband was very sad sometimes.

He would say, 'Mr McCain has forgotten me.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-542277/How-war-hero-John-McCain-betrayed-Vietnamese-peasant-saved-life.html



Maybe it never happened.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 10:11 am
woiyo wrote:
Location: Reality, Earth


I don't think so.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 10:28 am
JTT wrote:
woiyo wrote:
Location: Reality, Earth


I don't think so.


How would you know anything about reality when you by into anything written which likely is someones fantasy?

Why should that story be believable?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 12:14 pm
woiyo wrote:
JTT wrote:
woiyo wrote:
Location: Reality, Earth


I don't think so.


How would you know anything about reality when you by into anything written which likely is someones fantasy?

Why should that story be believable?


Quote:

"Nearly three decades later, a Vietnamese government commission confirmed he was indeed the rescuer and, in a 1996 meeting in Hanoi, McCain embraced and thanked Mr On and presented him with a Senate memento."


Many more important questions need to be asked. Why did McCain snub Mr On? Had McCain's book already been published? Had McCain already invented a story with tales of his own derring-do that would then be undone with the truth?

Quote:


SEN. JOHN McCAIN: THE ULTIMATE "RHINESTONE HERO"

...

While a prisoner of war, McCain was treated as a "special prisoner," with privileges including being given his own private and affectionate nurse.

McCain's treatment as a "special prisoner" is a contradiction to his much publicized image of a great war hero who was severely tortured and kept in solitary confinement for long periods of time because he refused to break during interrogation.

Ted Guy, a former Air Force Colonel held 5 1/2 years by the Vietnamese and McCain's senior ranking officer (SRO) in the POW camp, told the U.S. Veteran Dispatch he cannot remember the communists ever laying a hand on McCain.

...

The following is McCain's own admission of collaboration in an article he wrote, printed May 14, 1973 in U.S. News and World Report:

"I think it was on the fourth day [after being shot down] that two guards came in, instead of one. One of them pulled back the blanket to show the other guard my injury. I looked at my knee. It was about the size, shape and color of a football. I remembered that when I was a flying instructor a fellow had ejected from his plane and broken his thigh. He had gone into shock, the blood had pooled in his leg, and he died, which came as quite a surprise to us - a man dying of a broken leg. Then I realized that a very similar thing was happening to me.

"When I saw it, I said to the guard, `O.K., get the officer.'"

"An officer came in after a few minutes. It was the man that we came to know very well as "The Bug." He was a psychotic torturer, one of the worst fiends that we had to deal with. I said, `O.K., I'll give you military information if you will take me to the hospital.'"

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd59.htm

0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 12:25 pm
I guess more bullsh!t is going to come out and you can enjoy the fantasy. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 12:41 pm
woiyo wrote:
I guess more bullsh!t is going to come out and you can enjoy the fantasy. Rolling Eyes


The following is McCain's own admission of collaboration in an article he wrote, printed May 14, 1973 in U.S. News and World Report:

"I think it was on the fourth day [after being shot down] that two guards came in, instead of one. One of them pulled back the blanket to show the other guard my injury. I looked at my knee. It was about the size, shape and color of a football. I remembered that when I was a flying instructor a fellow had ejected from his plane and broken his thigh. He had gone into shock, the blood had pooled in his leg, and he died, which came as quite a surprise to us - a man dying of a broken leg. Then I realized that a very similar thing was happening to me.

"When I saw it, I said to the guard, `O.K., get the officer.'"

"An officer came in after a few minutes. It was the man that we came to know very well as "The Bug." He was a psychotic torturer, one of the worst fiends that we had to deal with. I said, `O.K., I'll give you military information if you will take me to the hospital.'"
0 Replies
 
Arendt
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 01:09 pm
'Special prisoner' or not, McCain's record is nothing but heroic.

To voluntarily stay in the Hanoi Hilton so another POW could go home is an act of incredible bravery and honor. I have visited the Hanoi Hilton, or what is left of it, and I can say for damn sure that that place was no holiday picnic for ANYONE.

McCain is an honorable man, I don't believe he is the best man for the presidency, but it makes me sick when he gets "swift boated".
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 01:45 pm
Arendt wrote:
'Special prisoner' or not, McCain's record is nothing but heroic.

To voluntarily stay in the Hanoi Hilton so another POW could go home is an act of incredible bravery and honor. I have visited the Hanoi Hilton, or what is left of it, and I can say for damn sure that that place was no holiday picnic for ANYONE.

McCain is an honorable man, I don't believe he is the best man for the presidency, but it makes me sick when he gets "swift boated".



It might be, if it's true. However, isn't accepting 'special prisoner' status equal to denying that to other prisoners. "Voluntarily" staying was, as I understand it, standard operating procedure. But if you have something more that points up that he did something extraordinary, Arendt, please post it.

McCain has shown, time and again, just what an opportunist he is. He's willing to say anything, change any position, in order to obtain what he wants. This definitely calls into question just what you mean by 'honorable'.

Has his story been vetted? Documents obtained from DOD seem to cast some degree of doubt on the 'story'.

Quote:


McCain continuously violates the Code of Conduct

In direct violation of the Code of Conduct, McCain, who was supposedly in solitary confinement, met with and was interviewed by several foreign news reporters and political delegations, including many high-ranking North Vietnamese leaders, such as Gen. Vo Nguyen Giap, North Vietnam's Minister of Defense and national hero.

Through the Freedom of Information Act, the U.S. Veteran Dispatch acquired a declassified Department of Defense (DOD) transcript of an interview prominent French television reporter Francois Chalais had with McCain.

Chalais told of his private interview with POW McCain in a series titled "Life in Hanoi", which was aired in Europe. In the series, Chalais said his meeting with McCain was "a meeting which will leave its mark on my life."

"My meeting with John Sidney McCain was certainly one of those meetings which will affect me most profoundly for the rest of my life. I had asked the North Vietnamese authorities to allow me to personally interrogate an American Prisoners. They authorized me to do so. When night fell, they took me --- without any precautions or mystery --- to a hospital near the Gia Lam airport reserved for the military (passage omitted). The officer who receives me begins: "I ask you not to ask any questions of political nature. If this man replies in a way unfavorable to us, they will not hesitate to speak of `brainwashing' and conclude that we threatened him.

"This John McCain is not an ordinary prisoner. His father is none other than Admiral Edmond John McCain, commander in chief of U.S. Naval forces in Europe. (passage omitted).

Another declassified DOD document reports an interview between POW McCain and Dr. Fernando Barral, a Spanish psychiatrist who was living in Cuba at the time. The interview was published in the Havana Gramma in January 1970.

According to the DOD report, the meeting between Barral and McCain took place away from the prison at the office of the Committee for Foreign Cultural Relations in Hanoi. During that interview, POW McCain sipped coffee and ate oranges and cakes with his interrogator.

During that interview, McCain again seriously violated the Code of Conduct by failing to "evade answering questions" to the "utmost" of his ability when he, according to the DOD report, helped Barral by answering questions in Spanish, a language McCain had learned in school.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd60.htm

0 Replies
 
Arendt
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 02:19 pm
"However, isn't accepting 'special prisoner' status equal to denying that to other prisoners."

Whether or not he was a "special prisoner" is immaterial to me. I have seen the Hanoi Hilton in much better times and it is a hell hole.

"'Voluntarily' staying was, as I understand it, standard operating procedure. But if you have something more that points up that he did something extraordinary, Arendt, please post it."

Regardless of what the books say, being offered the opportunity to escape torture in the HH as a POW, and denying that chance because another less politically fortunate soldier was next in line, IS extraordinary.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 02:33 pm
Arendt wrote:
"However, isn't accepting 'special prisoner' status equal to denying that to other prisoners."

Whether or not he was a "special prisoner" is immaterial to me. I have seen the Hanoi Hilton in much better times and it is a hell hole.

"'Voluntarily' staying was, as I understand it, standard operating procedure. But if you have something more that points up that he did something extraordinary, Arendt, please post it."

Regardless of what the books say, being offered the opportunity to escape torture in the HH as a POW, and denying that chance because another less politically fortunate soldier was next in line, IS extraordinary.


So, you're saying that you can't offer anything more other than the opinion of someone who doesn't want to think that they wasted their money on his book.

What is it that makes folks like you run from the truth, Arendt?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 03:18 pm
JTT,

You and I are basically on the same side; but attacking McCain's time as a POW is a non-starter. It isn't that I think you are wrong, just that it is not an effective way to work against the guy.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 03:27 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
JTT,

You and I are basically on the same side; but attacking McCain's time as a POW is a non-starter. It isn't that I think you are wrong, just that it is not an effective way to work against the guy.

Cycloptichorn


I don't see getting to the truth as an attack, Cy. I realize that this is almost sacred ground, but what is the truth, if not sacred ground? The documentation seems to suggest that his story just ain't all it's cracked up to be.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 03:30 pm
JTT wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
JTT,

You and I are basically on the same side; but attacking McCain's time as a POW is a non-starter. It isn't that I think you are wrong, just that it is not an effective way to work against the guy.

Cycloptichorn


I don't see getting to the truth as an attack, Cy. I realize that this is almost sacred ground, but what is the truth, if not sacred ground? The documentation seems to suggest that his story just ain't all it's cracked up to be.


I agree. But I don't think that people will care, and it will echo the 'swift-boat' attacks on Kerry. I don't see it being that much of a useful tack.

Cheers
Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Arendt
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 03:57 pm
"So, you're saying that you can't offer anything more other than the opinion of someone who doesn't want to think that they wasted their money on his book.

What is it that makes folks like you run from the truth, Arendt?"

The truth is that McCain's conduct during his years as a prisoner of war is, if NOTHING ELSE, not something which can be seriously criticized by any realistic standard of assessment. He did his duty and did not take advantage of the opportunity afforded to him by his powerful father. In those circumstance that is enough to deserve admiration.

I am not a supporter of McCain, but this angle of attack is foolish, both politically and morally.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 04:31 pm
Arendt wrote:
"So, you're saying that you can't offer anything more other than the opinion of someone who doesn't want to think that they wasted their money on his book.

What is it that makes folks like you run from the truth, Arendt?"

The truth is that McCain's conduct during his years as a prisoner of war is, if NOTHING ELSE, not something which can be seriously criticized by any realistic standard of assessment. He did his duty and did not take advantage of the opportunity afforded to him by his powerful father. In those circumstance that is enough to deserve admiration.

I am not a supporter of McCain, but this angle of attack is foolish, both politically and morally.


Agreed
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 07:52 pm
McCain's Day Marked By False Statements And Gaffes
by Sam Stein
The Huffington Post
A series of misstatements and verbal gaffes hampered Sen. John McCain on the day that unofficially marked the beginning of his general election campaign against Barack Obama.

Appearing at a press conference in Louisiana on Wednesday, McCain claimed that he had supported "every investigation" into the flawed response to Hurricane Katrina, when, in fact, he had twice voted against creating a commission to inspect the tragedy.

The remark immediately bounced around political circles and websites. After all it was just a few months ago when McCain defended those very votes on the back of his campaign bush, casting them as part of a broader campaign against wasteful spending.

"I'm proud of my support of American citizens regarding the taxpayers," the Senator said in April. "I will not vote for projects and programs and bills that are laden with pork-barrel projects that waste taxpayers' dollars."

The entire episode elicited a scathing rebuttal from the Obama camp.

"Whether he simply wasn't aware of his voting record again or he was intentionally misleading the people of Louisiana, John McCain certainly isn't offering us 'leadership you can believe in,'" wrote aide Hari Sevugan. To which, McCain's aides accused Obama of negative campaigning, saying the Senator wasn't familiar with the specific votes and had always supported Senate investigations, just not commissions.

That trip-up, however, was mild in compared to the gaffe that happened earlier in the day, when McCain acknowledged he was not aware that Obama had introduced a bill that called for international divestment from Iran.

Reporter: Are you familiar with his disinvestment bill?
McCain: No, I am not familiar with it at all. I do not know if it passed the senate or had any hearing or anything else. I had, so, literally thousands and thousands pieces of legislation are proposed every year. I know what he did. He voted against the Iranian revolutionary guard being declared a terrorist organization.


The admission could prove damaging for a variety of reasons. For starters, Obama's bill, which passed overwhelmingly in the House of Representatives, is currently being held up in the Senate by Republican Sen. Richard Shelby. More significantly, two McCain surrogates, Sen. Joseph Lieberman and Rep. Eric Cantor, are co-sponsors of Obama's measure despite, on Wednesday, ripping the Illinois Democrat for not having the experience to deal with Iran.

But a more worrisome issue for the McCain campaign may just be that a theme is emerging, both within the media and political circles, that the Arizona Republican has a penchant for playing lose with the facts. Indeed, last week, McCain lost crucial news cycles after he falsely claimed that force levels in Iraq had been drawn down to pre-surge levels and then, instead of admitting he misspoke, said the whole thing was a debate over verb tense. This, in turn, came after the Senator claimed, again falsely, that Iran was training al-Qaeda in Iraq, when in fact the two groups are religious and political adversaries.

All told, the gaffes have provided Obama an opportunity to re-frame a man who is best known as a "straight talker," a image battle McCain can ill afford to lose.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 08:19 pm
I wonder how many of you, that are attacking what McCain may or may not have done as a POW could have survived half of what he and other POW's went thru?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 08:25 pm
mysteryman wrote:
I wonder how many of you, that are attacking what McCain may or may not have done as a POW could have survived half of what he and other POW's went thru?
And that somehow makes him fit for president?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 11/25/2024 at 02:32:34