I Emailed Hillary

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

I e-mailed Hillary and asked her to run as an independent...

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

...try to remember I'm not an idiot....

So far, indications are to the contrary.

I was asking about what you thought of his independent bids for president (since this is relevant to the topic at hand).

Since your from chicago and you have first hand knowledge of the dishonesty of chicago politicians I think your intelligence is at question here not BPB's. I've voted democratic in the presidential race for 52 years but am now questioning the whole democratic machine. I don't like being told who to vote for by Dean or any other big shot democrat. Its obvious that the democratic machine set it up so Obama was a sure thing but that dosent mean I have to vote for him.

joefromchicago wrote:

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

I e-mailed Hillary and asked her to run as an independent...

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

...try to remember I'm not an idiot....

So far, indications are to the contrary.

first of all.... I did not email Hillary and ask her to run as an independent... I was just having my little joke and f*cking with the suckers

secondly... screw yourself Joe, you're one of the suckers.. :wink:

It would have been even shorter if you left off the "Wow!".

Since your from chicago and you have first hand knowledge of the dishonesty of chicago politicians I think your intelligence is at question here not BPB's. I've voted democratic in the presidential race for 52 years but am now questioning the whole democratic machine. I don't like being told who to vote for by Dean or any other big shot democrat. Its obvious that the democratic machine set it up so Obama was a sure thing but that dosent mean I have to vote for him.

You're really stepping in it today eh Joe? LOL!

In the time it took you to think that up I took two huge dumps. They both looked like you.

And the democratic party is pandering to the 40% of its constinuants by backing Obama because it fears thier loss of voting in the election but is forgetting about the 60% of treditional dem voters.

rabel22 wrote:

And the democratic party is pandering to the 40% of its constinuants by backing Obama because it fears thier loss of voting in the election but is forgetting about the 60% of treditional dem voters.

So Hillary represents the choice of "the 60% of treditional dem voters" and Obama represents "40% of [the party's] constinuants"?

How do you figure that works, since, you know - Obama has actually received more votes?

Fishin
Post my post. Not your interpertation of it.

E brown
No

Joefromchicago
And so little rebutal from you. As I said you should know how corrupt the daliy machine has been and still is today. And the democratic party is pandering to the 40% of its constinuants by backing Obama because it fears thier loss of voting in the election but is forgetting about the 60% of treditional dem voters. They show the same lack of bal-s they have shown for the last 20 years. They havent backed the best candidate since Kennedy and Johnson. The national democraticatic party lawmakers are only interested in being reelected to office just as in Illinois. A politician democratic or republican would scr-w his grandmother if it would get him reelected. Am I PO'ed. Your dam right I am. Im tired of hearing politicians promising me the moon and than dumping a bucket of sh-t on my head after they get reelected. And if you fools think your hero Obama is any different than you derserve the kind of government your going to get for the next four years. And let me reimind all of you that Hillery isent my first choice but all the wise dems already removed the best from consideration. I hope Hillery stays in to the end so my choice might get in in a brokered convention. But that wont happen because the dems are scared to death that if Obama dont get the nomination the blacks will bolt. Well they have driven at least one lifelong democrat from the party and maybe a hel- of a lot more then they realize. O K Roxine. Jump in here with your raciest crap.

Joefromchicago
And so little rebutal from you.

As I said you should know how corrupt the daliy machine has been and still is today. And the democratic party is pandering to the 40% of its constinuants by backing Obama because it fears thier loss of voting in the election but is forgetting about the 60% of treditional dem voters.

Well they have driven at least one lifelong democrat from the party and maybe a hel- of a lot more then they realize.

Nema
I didn't say anything about votes and you know it. I was refereing to the dems pandering to the 40% of the party that is black because they are afraid that they will bolt if Obama isn't their nominee. They are showing the same gutless attitude toward that part of the party that the conseratives show toward the religious right. It makes it hard to vote for either candidate so I am considering voting for someone not on the ballot. In illinois that is a wasted vote because they wont count it. But ill be dammed if I vote for someone that I don't really like or respect again. Obama is promising things he cant deliver on just like all crooked politicians.