Chatters?
Because I have withdrawn from the fray?
Ticomaya wrote:
Interesting ....
Now if google returns 4,540 hits for the search "liberal wingnut," ...
... but only 1,620 hits for the search, "conservative wingnut," ...
does that satisfy your definition of the term, "almost exclusively"?
Using Google totals without understanding what they represent is a really dumb way of proving things. Your selection of terms has more to do with your results than real differences in use.
E.g. here are selections in diametric opposition to your conclusions.
"right wingnut" (in quotes) - 23,700
"left wingnut" (in quotes) - 5,640
"left wing nut" (in quotes) - 90,000
"right wing nut" (in quotes) - 243,000
wingnut politics right - 844,000
wingnut politics left - 753,000
mysteryman wrote:Roxxxanne wrote:Anyone who has any political acumen whatsoever knows wing nut refers to right wingers.
So are you saying that even though there is more then one definition, the only one that counts is yours?
I have seen the word used thousand of times since I have been in the net in the last tne years and I have never seen it used to describe anyone but a right-wing nut. Anyone who has read as many blogs as I have over the years would know that I am right.
I will put up thousand dollars to anyone who wants to wager that I can prove that the word is used to describe right-wing nuts almost exclusively.
