0
   

UN Could Lead New 9/11 Investigation, Says Japanese MP

 
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 08:40 am
So, in fact, you are calling me a Nazi. No surprise there. I take it this would not be evidence of pettiness, since you don't apply the same standard to yourself as you do to me. Is this evidence of your genuine and altruistic desire to help? Here, pull the other one . . .
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 08:48 am
Setanta wrote:
When i called you on it, you as much as called me a Nazi.


Setanta wrote:
As i've already pointed out, Bull Feces referred to me as a Nazi supporter years ago . . .


farmerman wrote:
Now my feeling is, if you lie about one thing and make up data, youll do it on other points as well.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 08:49 am
Logic isn't one of your strong points, is it Just Talkin' Trash?
0 Replies
 
rabel22
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 09:00 am
Look at whose is talking trash when the most intelligent comment Set can make is moran.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 09:03 am
Setanta wrote:
When i called you on it, you as much as called me a Nazi.


Setanta wrote:
As i've already pointed out, Bull Feces referred to me as a Nazi supporter years ago . . .



Setanta wrote:
So, in fact, you are calling me a Nazi.


You seem to have an inordinate amount of confusion as to what constitutes facts, Set. Is this how, what appears to be a delusion, started with you overreacting just as you've done here, in bold above.

BlueFlame said you are a spelling Nazi and what has occurred in this thread alone shows that you are, though for the life of me I can't understand why someone whose postings contain more than a few spelling mistakes would leap into such a precarious position.

The word hypocrite comes to mind.

You're also very selective about pointing your cudgel, hmmm finger. There are others, names need not be mentioned, whose postings are full of mistakes but they get a pass from the language meister.

It really makes one wonder what the purpose of it is. It couldn't be that you use it merely to stifle debate, ... could it?
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 09:05 am
Setanta, Spelling Nazi fits. It's funny but true. Your spelling posts are pettiness plus.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 09:06 am
Farmerman, is the "pancake theory" still the official story being used to explain the collapse of the three towers?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 09:26 am
When someone calls me a Nazi supporter, that is sufficient to qualify the use of the locution: ". . . as much as called me a Nazi." When someone subsequently refers to me as a spelling Nazi, that is, both technically and literally, a case of calling me a Nazi.

I understand that you don't do logic, Just Talkin' Trash, but this will be the last time i bother to explain something so basic to you. I suspect you have no more comprehension of humor (or of irony) than does Bull Feces

***************************************

Yeah, right, Bull Feces, but it is not pettiness to call me a spelling Nazi? Sauce for the goose makes sauce for the gander, you are being petty by your own definition. Hoist on your own petard.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 09:36 am
NIST tsting according to ASTM standards has concluded that the metal fatigued, bent , and allowed overlying weight to propogate a collapse. The "pancake" effect is what happened in subsequent lower floors.

Nothing Ive seen has contradicted that explanation or countered the evidence.

I know the 9'11 guys have pointed to pictures of torch (or "thermite") cut vertical support columns that were obviously cut by welding equipment. These supports were actually verticals that were cut by rescuers AFTER the buildings collapsed. The clear evidence for this is that all the melted metal resulting from the cutting torches is lying ON TOP of building rubble. SO how could the weld melt be contemporaneous with the building collapse? Its pure forensic evidence, and its not even that high tech.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 09:38 am
FM, you fail to consider the low, low standards of evidence upon which these jokers rely . . .
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 09:42 am
Im never surprised at that fact set.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 09:44 am
Bullies always start crying when stood up to.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 09:45 am
Who's cryin' . . . i've been laughin' at you literally for years . . .

Ya can't be the free entertainment at this site . . .
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 09:46 am
Setanta wrote:
When someone calls me a Nazi supporter, that is sufficient to qualify the use of the locution: ". . . as much as called me a Nazi." When someone subsequently refers to me as a spelling Nazi, that is, both technically and literally, a case of calling me a Nazi.

I understand that you don't do logic, Just Talkin' Trash, but this will be the last time i bother to explain something so basic to you.


What's really amazing, Set, is that you chide others when the failings are so clearly yours. You rarely explain much. You just bark and snarl.

Everyone understands that words can have different meanings and clearly a soup Nazi or a spelling Nazi have very different connotations to being called a Nazi.

++++++++++++++++

M-W

Nazi

: one who is likened to a German Nazi: a harshly domineering, dictatorial, or intolerant person

++++++++++++++++++++++

There's no suggestion in spelling Nazi that you embrace the ideals of Nazism. It only says that you were a "harshly domineering, dictatorial, [or] intolerant person" with respect to some spelling mistakes.

The shoe fits perfectly.

As to whether you were ever called a Nazi, I'll definitely have to reserve judgment given your quantum leaps in illogic.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 09:48 am
Like i said, you don't do logic, and you obviously don't do humor either.

But that's OK, i've been laughin' at you for a long time, too.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 09:59 am
farmerman wrote:
NIST tsting according to ASTM standards has concluded that the metal fatigued, bent , and allowed overlying weight to propogate a collapse. The "pancake" effect is what happened in subsequent lower floors.



Thanks, FM. I have a few more questions, if you don't mind.

Doesn't it seem at all odd that three buildings, all on the same day, should exhibit the same behavior, when no other steel frame buildings where fire was involved have ever done that?

As the buildings were designed exactly with just such an event in mind, how could the design engineers have been so wrong? Let's keep in mind that the third building, WTC7, wasn't even hit by a plane.

Why was all the steel moved so quickly and melted down instead of saving it for investigation?

Why did all three buildings fall so perfectly? Do you believe that it's possible that the heating of the steel was so uniform that all the members failed uniformly? Why didn't any of the buildings topple?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 10:03 am
Setanta wrote:
Like i said, you don't do logic, and you obviously don't do humor either.

But that's OK, i've been laughin' at you for a long time, too.


This is so typical of you, Set. You start out, seemingly making some sense and then you tumble rapidly down into nonsense, scrambling to make good your escape, unwilling to face the idiotic things you've just stated in previous postings.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 10:07 am
Humor, Just Talkin' Trash . . . look it up if you don't understand the concept.

When Bull Feces hauled out the spelling Nazi routine, i cracked up. I knew i could have good fun with him then, but the bonus is how you've gotten your little lace panties in a twist over it too.

Have you ever wondered why i never respond to your political ravings when you venture into those threads? It's because your remarks are so lame-brained. I might agree in principle, but you make such a jackass of yourself with your feeble attempts at a plausible rhetoric.

But i surely can't fault you as a source of free entertainment.

"Why was all the steel moved so quickly and melted down instead of saving it for investigation?"

Oh yeah, hundreds, nay, thousands of evil operatives all involved in one of history's greatest conspiracies.

I'll tell ya, ya can't make up **** funnier than you guys.
0 Replies
 
rabel22
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 10:11 am
JTT
You don't understand that branding someone a moran is a huge leap in logic. At least it is according to Set.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 10:15 am
A Moran, huh?

Would that be one of the two athletes named Brad Moran to whom you refer? Or do you mean Bugs Moran, the Chicago ganster? Maybe you meant Crissy Moran, 'cause you're into porno. Or did you mean Erin Moran, because you're into witless teevee sitcoms, such as Happy Days.

Yeah, buster, yer a debater of high caliber--big bore, i'd say.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.26 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 05:31:20