0
   

What will you like most about the McCain Presidency?

 
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2008 09:18 am
blatham wrote:
Heritage org for your verification? Jeez, McG. How is it you continue to learn absolutely nothing about what went wrong and who is responsible?


Sorry I couldn't find anything on Salon.com that supports anything remotely positive in Iraq. I guess we all have our bias.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2008 09:25 am
McGentrix wrote:
blatham wrote:
Heritage org for your verification? Jeez, McG. How is it you continue to learn absolutely nothing about what went wrong and who is responsible?


Sorry I couldn't find anything on Salon.com that supports anything remotely positive in Iraq. I guess we all have our bias.


Proof, as if it was needed, that you don't read Salon.

Heritage is intimately associated with the neoconservative group that pushed for the war with Iraq and who have continued to insist, through all periods and phases of the war, that it has "been going swimmingly". Other than a few individuals who have left the movement, this community refuses utterly to take any responsibility for what happened and refuses consistently and blatantly to lie through their teeth about why the war began and the rationale for it. Get off the internet and read some books, for christs sakes.

Quote:
The Bush administration still has not told us why they [american kids] died. was not to protect the US from "weapons of mass destruction" (see below; that was a fabricated cover story). It was not to spread democracy. It may have been to nail down a major petroleum-producing country for US geostrategic goals (ensuring its resources were available to the US and could be denied if necessary to growing rivals such as China). If so, one has to ask whether the objectives (which were hidden from the American people) were the top priority for the US, or only for the petroleum industry; whether those objectives have been achieved; and whether there was another way to attain them. No such debate has ever been held. Was it in part to ensure Israeli security, as Mearsheimer and Walt argue (and Craig Unger implicitly argues, below)? If so, that should be stated, it should be debated. Even the former head of Shin Bet did not agree that it increased Israel's security. It is not right to ask men and women under arms to die for their country without telling them exactly how they are benefiting their country. For all we know, they have died so that Bush and Cheney could throw goodies to their "base," so that Halliburton could escape bankruptcy and Hunt Oil could get new development contracts.
http://www.juancole.com/
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2008 09:29 am
Sorry, you don't get to rebut heritage.org with Juan Cole.
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2008 02:18 pm
New to this topic. What I would like about a McCain Presidency: Immigration reform. Let's see if McCain is willing to keep working on developing a more substantial solution than "build a fence". That could be interesting since if McCain is willing to provide cover to the Democratic congress, we could really get something done.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2008 03:02 pm
blatham wrote:
McGentrix wrote:
blatham wrote:
Heritage org for your verification? Jeez, McG. How is it you continue to learn absolutely nothing about what went wrong and who is responsible?


Sorry I couldn't find anything on Salon.com that supports anything remotely positive in Iraq. I guess we all have our bias.


Proof, as if it was needed, that you don't read Salon.

Heritage is intimately associated with the neoconservative group that pushed for the war with Iraq and who have continued to insist, through all periods and phases of the war, that it has "been going swimmingly". Other than a few individuals who have left the movement, this community refuses utterly to take any responsibility for what happened and refuses consistently and blatantly to lie through their teeth about why the war began and the rationale for it. Get off the internet and read some books, for christs sakes.

Quote:
The Bush administration still has not told us why they [american kids] died. was not to protect the US from "weapons of mass destruction" (see below; that was a fabricated cover story). It was not to spread democracy. It may have been to nail down a major petroleum-producing country for US geostrategic goals (ensuring its resources were available to the US and could be denied if necessary to growing rivals such as China). If so, one has to ask whether the objectives (which were hidden from the American people) were the top priority for the US, or only for the petroleum industry; whether those objectives have been achieved; and whether there was another way to attain them. No such debate has ever been held. Was it in part to ensure Israeli security, as Mearsheimer and Walt argue (and Craig Unger implicitly argues, below)? If so, that should be stated, it should be debated. Even the former head of Shin Bet did not agree that it increased Israel's security. It is not right to ask men and women under arms to die for their country without telling them exactly how they are benefiting their country. For all we know, they have died so that Bush and Cheney could throw goodies to their "base," so that Halliburton could escape bankruptcy and Hunt Oil could get new development contracts.
http://www.juancole.com/


Some other quotes from Juan Cole...

1- March, 2003:

"My analysis is not meant to support an anti-war or pro-war position. Like most people, I have mixed feelings about all this (I despise the Baath Party)."

2- April, 2003:

"The Iraq war has resulted in many human casualties that make any humane person want to weep. I hope the human sacrifice will have been worth it; certainly Saddam's regime was virtually genocidal and it is a great good thing that it is gone."

3- February, 2003:

"I am an Arabist and happen to know something serious about Baathist Iraq, which paralyzes me from opposing a war for regime change in that country (Milosevic did not kill nearly as many people). If it is true that Chirac thinks the Baath party can be reformed from without, he is simply wrong."

4- March, 2003:

"I remain convinced that, for all the concerns one might have about the aftermath, the removal of Saddam Hussein and the murderous Baath regime from power will be worth the sacrifices that are about to be made on all sides. The rest of us have a responsibility to work to see that the lives lost are redeemed by the building of a genuinely democratic and independent Iraq in the coming years."

5- July, 2003:

"I don't think this Iraq war was a last resort, and I became increasingly uncomfortable with the way the war fever was whipped up with very dubious claims by powerful Iraqi expatriates and the right in Washington. However, and this is the big "H," I have lived with Baathist Iraq since I got into the Middle East field, and being a specialist in Shiism and a friend to Iraqi Shiites meant that I knew exactly what the Saddam regime had done to them. So, I refused to come out against the war. I was against the way the war was pursued--the innuendo, the exaggerations, the arrogant unilateralism. But I could not bring myself to be against the removal of that genocidal regime from power."
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2008 03:23 pm
Who will be the kictchen soup Resident among the three apirants.

One was blindly approved who wish to uphold the American Dream and his counterparts are struggling to get approval rate.
The Non- Americans are fed up with this Black, Gender( Lady) NYT; WP; IHT opinion makers.
The fact is this.
The whole world has other problems than that of yours.
Ask the plight of Buddhist in Burma, Nepal, China, India.
Ask not the Germans about this Buddist plight.

Back to the subject.
Your Noble, all powerful country should use some simple word like

SORRY
excuse me
And preach not sermons to the globe with borrowed braind a nd manipulated corporate consume culture.
Easter is over( it is 22.26 now in Köln)
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2008 04:26 pm
Oh I think we can rebut the heritage foundation with Juan Cole. Look at his resume.

Professor of History

Quote:
Cole commands Arabic, Persian and Urdu and reads some Turkish, knows both Middle Eastern and South Asian Islam, and lived in a number of places in the Muslim world for extended periods of time



Quote:
Education


1975 B.A. History and Literature of Religions, Northwestern University

1978 M.A. Arabic Studies/History, American University in Cairo

1984 Ph.D. Islamic Studies, University of California Los Angeles

Professional History


1984-1990 Assistant Professor of History, University of Michigan

1990-1995 Associate Professor of History, University of Michigan

1992-1995 Director, Center for Middle Eastern and North African Studies, University of Michigan

1995-2007 Professor of History, University of Michigan
2007- Richard P. Mitchell Collegiate Professor of History, University of Michigan


Scholastic Awards and Grants ;James Aronson Award for Social Justice Journalism, Hunter College, 2005. ; Hudson Research Professorship, Winter, 2003 ; Award for Research in Turkey, May, 1999, International Institute, U-M ; Research Excellence Award, College of LSA, U-M, August, 1997 ; OVPR and LSA Faculty Assistance Fund Grants, June, 1995 ; LSA Faculty Assistance Fund Grant, March 1994 ; Rackham Research Partnership, 1992-93 ; National Endowment for the Humanities, Jan.-June, 1991 ; Office of the Vice-President for Research, U-M (Pakistan), Summer 1990 ; Horace H. Rackham Faculty Grant, Egypt, Summer 1988 ; SSRC/ACLS Post-Doctoral Award, England, Summer 1986 ; Fulbright-Hays Islamic Civilization Postdoctoral Award, Egypt, 1985-86 ; SSRC/ACLS Doctoral Fellowship, Pakistan, India, UK, 1981-83 ; Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Fellowship, India, 1982

At the University of Michigan, he teaches courses on the modern history of the Middle East and on South Asia. He regularly teaches History 241, America and Middle Eastern Wars. He also offers a survey, History 443 Modern Middle East History. For graduate students he offersr History 664 Studies on the Modern Middle East, History 749 Seminar on the Modern Middle East, and History 793 The Study of the Near East, and has co-taught History 615 Comparative World History.

Recent National Service

Quote:
Middle East Studies Association of North America:

President, 2006.
1999-2004. Editor, The International Journal of Middle East Studies (Published by Cambridge University Press for the Middle East Studies Association of North America).
1998 Program Committee chair, MESA annual conference
1996, 1989 Officer Nominating Committee

1991, Book Award Committee, Middle East Studies Association

1988-1992 Book Review Editor, International Journal of Middle East Studies

1987-1989 Society for Iranian Studies: Council

Other

2003- Editor, H-Mideast-Politics Electronic Forum.

1997- Editor, H-Bahai Electronic Forum and Journal

1995-2000 Editorial Board, Critique
1993-1996 Social Science Research Council: Joint Committee on the Near and Middle East

1993 Columbia University, Middle East Institute: Outside Reviewer.

1992-1994 Eastern Consortium of Middle East Centers: Chairman, Persian-Turkish Summer Programs

1992-1995 American Institute of Iranian Studies: Board of Directors

1992 American Council of Learned Societies: Fellowship Selection Committee

1991- Editorial Board, Iranian Studies
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2008 04:28 pm
revel wrote:
some junk


Sorry, Heritage wins.

http://www.heritage.org/experts/
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2008 04:31 pm
"All the fun is how you say a thing"---Robert Frost
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2008 04:38 pm
McGentrix wrote:
revel wrote:
some junk


Sorry, Heritage wins.

http://www.heritage.org/experts/


Nope not even close. Juan cole knows the language; study on the cultural and even lived in the area of the middle east. Has degrees out the wazoo on the subject as well and his list is ten times longer than those you listed.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2008 04:51 pm
Juan cole is highly acclaimed professor
and his views are not banal like xyz.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2008 05:05 pm
revel wrote:
McGentrix wrote:
revel wrote:
some junk


Sorry, Heritage wins.

http://www.heritage.org/experts/


Nope not even close. Juan cole knows the language; study on the cultural and even lived in the area of the middle east. Has degrees out the wazoo on the subject as well and his list is ten times longer than those you listed.


lol, makes me wonder how you manage to get your pants on.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2008 05:42 pm
Does anyone care about the policy of a person who get selected/elected with 30 percent of the citizens?
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2008 06:32 pm
McGentrix wrote:
revel wrote:
McGentrix wrote:
revel wrote:
some junk


Sorry, Heritage wins.

http://www.heritage.org/experts/


Nope not even close. Juan cole knows the language; study on the cultural and even lived in the area of the middle east. Has degrees out the wazoo on the subject as well and his list is ten times longer than those you listed.


lol, makes me wonder how you manage to get your pants on.


And you were doing so good ealier; now you are back to resorting to tired lines you probably think are humorous.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Mar, 2008 07:36 am
McCain's Unearned credibility
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Mar, 2008 07:40 am
What will I like about a McCain presidency?

he isn't bush

What will I like about a Clinton presidency?

she isn't bush

What will I like about an Obama presidency?

he isn't bush.

aside from that what do I now, after watching and listening these past months, look forward to no matter who wins and who do I support?

nothing and none of them.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Mar, 2008 07:51 am
"We're succeeding. I don't care what anybody says. I've seen the facts on the ground," the Arizona senator insisted a day after a roadside bomb in Baghdad killed four U.S. soldiers and rockets pounded the U.S.-protected Green Zone there, and a wave of attacks left at least 61 Iraqis dead nationwide."
0 Replies
 
Gargamel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Mar, 2008 08:52 am
When McCain is President, I will rest easy knowing we have a Commander In-Chief who can "answer the call" at 3am--whatever the **** that actually means--but, considering he will probably retire every evening at 4:30 pm, after eating Long John Silvers while watching Jeopardy, just like my Grandma, I'm more concerned about the call at 7pm.

It will be exciting to watch him play bingo on C-Span.

Finally, it will add much dramatic flair to his State of the Union addresses when, during dramatic pauses, the camera pans to a shot of the Grim Reaper standing and applauding.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Mar, 2008 02:54 pm
Media Confusing McCain Idealogy with Expertise
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Mar, 2008 04:14 pm
Blueflame
against
Logic there is no
armor like my ignorance
Regards
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/08/2025 at 05:27:33