mysteryman wrote:Advocate wrote:Real, you need to bone up on history.
Just before Gulf War I, when Saddam was our ally, our ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, told Saddam that we were not concerned with ME borders. State announced the same thing. We contemplated that Saddam would merely seize some oil fields in Northern Kuwait. Saddam took our advice to mean that we would not be concerned should he take over Kuwait.
April Glaspie has denied that she evr said that.
I believe her before I believe Saddam Hussein.
The fact that you believe Hussein says something about you.
mysteryman wrote:Advocate wrote:Regarding Gulf War II, it was our naked grab for Iraq's oil.
Then why hasnt any of that oil made its way to the US?
Why has Iraq awarded oil contracts to European and Russian companies, but almost none to US companies?
If we are getting all of Iraqs oil, WHERE IS IT?
What MM said. On both.
'Gulf War II' as Advocate puts it, actually still IS Gulf War I.
The removal of Saddam was a direct result of Saddam's repeated and calculated violations of the sanctions that accompanied the cessation of hostilities during the early part of the war.
The Gulf War had a cease fire, but not an end. Hostilities resumed because of Saddam.
Liberals cannot be honest about this, because they lose their ability to play politics with the war.
Saddam lied, people died.
They don't dare say it.