0
   

The UN, US and Iraq IV

Forums: Politics, Iraq
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
the prince
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 08:35 am
Breaking News

'No WMD in Iraq', source claims

Now what next ?
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 08:36 am
Gautam wrote:
Sofia wrote:
Steve
The state of Iraq no longer has the means to launch conventional or non-conventional attacks on...anyone. In effect, disarmed.


Has anyone stopped to think that they were disarmed even before the war ????


You mean except fo the SCUD's they fired?
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 08:36 am
Sofia wrote:
Shroeder just finished glorifying Bush. They met in the WH, Shroeder gave a glowing "Thank you" to Bush for his progress in Iraq, and Bush said the problems between Germany and the US are over.

Guess he's in line with the Resolution....


How much was the check for? I need to log it in the register... :wink:
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 08:39 am
Tell me again how the Iraqi people are so much happier and so much better off under the Bremer dictatorship.
Another attack on civilians
Quote:

Glad to see the US taking lessons from the Israelis. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 08:39 am
Sofia wrote:
Its the bands of terrorists, now, who still have small arms. The state of Iraq, however, has been disarmed. That was Steve's statement, and what my remark responds to.


You call them terrorists, I call them Iraqis. Granted some are from other arab countries. They launch weapons, they attack. Doesn't sound like disarmament to me. I do know what you're saying, Sofia, but there seems to be a lot of disagreement about semantics going on between the pros and antis.
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 08:42 am
Germany...for sale, you say? How little you must think of Gerhardt! Pity!
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 09:08 am
Coalition account: On day one of the war, 20 March, military spokesmen for the US and UK announce that "Scud-type" missiles have been fired into Kuwait. This was significant because Iraq was banned from having Scuds or other missiles of a similar range under UN resolutions.

Clarification:Three days later US General Stanley McChrystal reports: "So far there have been no Scuds launched."
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 09:16 am
dyslexia wrote:
Coalition account: On day one of the war, 20 March, military spokesmen for the US and UK announce that "Scud-type" missiles have been fired into Kuwait. This was significant because Iraq was banned from having Scuds or other missiles of a similar range under UN resolutions.

Clarification:Three days later US General Stanley McChrystal reports: "So far there have been no Scuds launched."


Inspectors accounted for all but two, where are they?
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 09:19 am
So Brand X is saying that Iraq is NOT disarmed.
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 09:21 am
If there is no standing gov with the ability or authority or desire to use them, Iraq is disarmed.

<nods>
0 Replies
 
the prince
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 09:23 am
Sofia - there is a news story on BBC (posted a link a some posts ago) saying that There are no WMD found in Iraq.

Would you care to comment ?
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 09:26 am
There will continue to be no WMDs found...until they are found. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 09:28 am
Iraq has NOT been disarmed. You can't have it both/THREE ways. You can't say we went to war to disarm Iraq of WMD, but failed to find any Iraqi WMD, therefore Iraq must be disarmed, but the war was justified in any case.

Well that's not true actually, you can say it, but it doesn't help your credibility. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 09:28 am
Sofia wrote:
There will continue to be no WMDs found...until they are found. :wink:


The defiant Saddam, is the WMD, til he's found, there is a problem.
0 Replies
 
the prince
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 09:31 am
Sofia wrote:
There will continue to be no WMDs found...until they are found. :wink:


So when is Bush planning to fly them into Iraq to be found ?
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 09:32 am
Steve--

If you remove the gov., you have effectively disarmed the gov. That's just basic logic.
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 09:33 am
Gautam wrote:
Sofia wrote:
There will continue to be no WMDs found...until they are found. :wink:


So when is Bush planning to fly them into Iraq to be found ?


If he were going to do that, he would have done it a long time ago. We need more shovels.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 09:34 am
Sofia wrote:
Steve--

If you remove the gov., you have effectively disarmed the gov. That's just basic logic.


No, that is not logic.
0 Replies
 
the prince
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 09:34 am
Laughing Okay Sofia !! U win...

Bush will keep digging - I just hope he manages to come out of the hole which he is currently digging !!
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2003 09:36 am
Gautum-- Laughing

LittleK-- Is so.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The UN, US and Iraq IV
  3. » Page 53
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.13 seconds on 05/18/2025 at 07:23:04
▲ ▼