Re: Hey! It tastes like shitcken!
cyphercat wrote:boomerang wrote:And tofu. Don't get me started. I know, I know "It's delicious!" (if you spend 900 hours soaking it in something tasty).
Yeah, I know! It's so ridiculous to have to
prepare a food for it to taste good!!
*sigh*
Tofu tastes like crap because it is crap. A good hunk of ground beef can be grilled, slapped on a plate, and it tastes good right now. Do you suggest that people should eat tofu right out of the plastic tub (ah, packaging, packaging), because it's "good for them?"
Just in case there are any new age types out there who cherish the illusion that they are getting right with their own karma and the natural world by eating tofu--here's a little information for you. Tofu is a prepared food--it doesn't come from the tofu tree, it is made from bean curd. Although it is sometimes made from other beans, or even using some types of nuts, far and away, tofu is may from soy milk curd, and that is made from soy beans. Soy beans are a product of large-scale commercial agriculture, and they are, in the corporate framing context, a highly erosive plant--both wind and water erosion--because the classic model is "clean row cropping." This means that the little beans grow on little bean plants, which grow, row on row, with bare soil between them. The wind blows through, and bye-bye soil. The rain comes down, and bye-bye soil. Additionally, commercial farming of soy beans almost always involves the use of insecticides and herbicides--the first to protect the plants, and the second to foster the clean row cropping, eliminating plant competitors.
But it gets better: over the last 30 years--prior to which the United States was the world's largest producer of soy beans--many nations have gotten into the competition in this lucrative agri-business market. Notable among the new competitors is Brazil. In Brazil, new farm land has been most commonly opened up by cutting down the rain forests. Since most of the nutrients in the biomass of a rain forest are above the ground, the soil is quickly exhausted. Someone, of course, usually profits from selling off any usable hard woods when the rain forest is cut down, but any of the forest, including a good deal more plant life than just the trees, which doesn't have an immediate commercial value is simply burned off--nice contribution to atmospheric carbon dioxide.
Since the the soil under the rain forest is usually so poor, and is therefore quickly exhausted, the corporate farming operations soon go looking for more rain forest to cut down. The fields may recover to the extent that they can be used to graze livestock, but the rain forest is gone for good.
Eat hearty, New Age heroes ! ! !