@Roberta,
This is sounding like pure
torture, Roberta!
I hope the next manuscript is a masterpiece!
@Roberta,
Quote: It requires sole searching.
Sonar helps unfrustrate your search for flounders.
@farmerman,
Right. I think this thread is starting to flounder.
Chapter 4:
particularly venerable to higher correlations
This one is thud worthy. Thud.
@Merry Andrew,
I heard one on NPR today at the noon news.
The HS C (supercollider) today began an experiment in which high speed proteins were sent to collide with other proteins . So maybe thats how DNA was created?
I wuz t'inkin' 'bout ya the udder evenin', Raboida . . .
I've done lots of proof-reading, and some editing, and it's a difficult, and all too often a thankless job. I admire you for it.
And, may i say, thank you. (So it's not entirely thankless for you.)
@McTag,
i like to get aggrieved at grievious errors
it makes me hot and bothered but not in that order
@farmerman,
Yeah, them collidin' proteins is somethin' else, ain't they.
fm, Not the start of DNA. It's a new diet. The colliding protein plan.
set, Thanks for the thanks. Yes, it's a thankless job. And an invisible one. If you do it well, no one notices. The only time people notice is when you miss something or make a mistake. C'est la vie.
Tonight, as Lola, Bernie, and I talked politics, we noticed that the Tea Party Movement could use a good proofreader for its slogans.
Maybe an employment opportunity?
@Thomas,
I have a friend named Moran, I think I will glom your sine.
@Thomas,
Thomas wrote:
Tonight, as Lola, Bernie, and I talked politics, we noticed that the Tea Party Movement could use a good proofreader for its slogans.
Maybe an employment opportunity?
Hey, he spelled USA right. Nobody's poifect, Thomas. Thanks for looking out for possible employment opportunities for me.
In one paragraph in the book I'm editing, I found George Stephanopoulos spelled:
Stephanoupolis
Stephanoplois
Stpehanpilis
Thud.
@Roberta,
Each time, a little shorter and more efficient. I like it.
@roger,
roger wrote:
Each time, a little shorter and more efficient. I like it.
Yes, but at this rate it'll be Syphilis the next time it appears!
@dlowan,
dlowan wrote:
roger wrote:
Each time, a little shorter and more efficient. I like it.
Yes, but at this rate it'll be Syphilis the next time it appears!
Don't be silly, deb. Isn't that disease spelled siphilos?
@Roberta,
Roberta wrote:
dlowan wrote:
roger wrote:
Each time, a little shorter and more efficient. I like it.
Yes, but at this rate it'll be Syphilis the next time it appears!
Don't be silly, deb. Isn't that disease spelled siphilos?
Isn't "disease" spelled "disseez"?
