28
   

"Peons of Praise"--The Author Said That

 
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Mar, 2009 06:15 pm
@Roberta,
Yes.

Though I get what they meant!!!

How did you phrase it?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Mar, 2009 06:19 pm
"responsive response."
Mr. Green
0 Replies
 
mac11
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Mar, 2009 06:39 pm
Great thread, Boida. I missed it the first (and second) time around.

I did some proofreading on papers for friends who were in grad school. One girl would just take whatever the spellcheck offered as its best guess and then let me clean things up. My favorite error was the time she misspelled equilibrium so badly that spellcheck had suggested "equal Librium."
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Mar, 2009 08:37 pm
@Roberta,
Roberta wrote:
I drew the line at a "responsive response." Had to fix that. Didn't I?

Noooo! You did it all wrong, woman! Why do you think you're living in the world's lawyer capital? I'll tell you why: You're living there so you can sue the hell out of your editor for pain and suffering and get $$$rich$$$ !!! It's the American Way -- how embarrassing that I, an immigrant, have to teach you this!
0 Replies
 
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Mar, 2009 10:45 pm
What did I change it to? Eliminated the noun. They were responsive and effective--or something like that.

Thomas, The pain and suffering when I'm proofreading isn't from stuff like this. This is annoying/almost amusing. When I'm proofreading, the pain and suffering comes from lack of subject/verb agreement! The damned thing was edited--by an actual editor. Why don't subjects and verbs agree?! Thanks for the lawsuit idea, you furriner, you. I like that.

Mac, Is there something wrong with Equal librium? Looks fine to me.
dlowan
 
  2  
Reply Sat 28 Mar, 2009 01:00 am
@Roberta,
Roberta wrote:

Why don't subjects and verbs agree?!


Human nature.


0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Mar, 2009 11:13 am
You should definitely start a book. It could be a bathroom reader or something.

And the title should be Title Waves.

Although, I "shutter to think" what other atrocities you've encountered.
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Mar, 2009 12:58 pm
@DrewDad,
I should have started collecting these much earlier. Don't have enough for a book. In fact, what you've seen here is pretty much all I have.

Love "Title Waves."
0 Replies
 
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Mar, 2009 03:00 am
I have two more from the same book, same editor, same kind of stupidity.

"learning the lessons learned"

and

"the target has to be meaningful and targeted"

Thud.
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Mar, 2009 05:34 am
@Roberta,
It's Bush's memoirs, isn't it?
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Mar, 2009 06:56 am
@Roberta,
Those are great .
Ive got one that is somehwat less obvious but, it made me smile.
Its from one of my san engineers who wrote a report about designing a sewage system for our mining town in ARgentina

"When community , on-ground sewage systems fail, the results can only be described as Cataclysmic"

Now I cant recall the last time I saw a **** volcano.
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Mar, 2009 12:10 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
Now I cant recall the last time I saw a **** volcano.

Poor cjhsa has been gone long enough to be forgotten, I guess.
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Mar, 2009 01:25 pm
Deb, LOL

farmerman, The mind boggles.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Mar, 2009 03:02 pm
@DrewDad,
DrewDad wrote:

farmerman wrote:
Now I cant recall the last time I saw a **** volcano.

Poor cjhsa has been gone long enough to be forgotten, I guess.



Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Apr, 2009 04:34 am
I've been hired for a kind of unusual job. A book on English grammar, punctuation, and usage was written, edited, proofread, and published.

Someone was interested in adapting it for a foreign market but declined after going through it and finding a few mistakes. I've been asked to check the whole shmear to determine whether the few mistakes were the only ones or whether the book is riddled with 'em.

It's riddled.

Just found an entire chapter based on an incorrect premise. If the author, editor, or proofreader had looked in the dictionary (which is what I did), the chapter wouldn't be part of the book.

What a woild. Am I wasting my time looking stuff up and trying to make things right? You seem to get paid whether you do or you don't. Nope, not wasting my time. I couldn't do it any other way.

Don't know whether to snarl or sigh. Maybe I'll snighrl.

farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Apr, 2009 04:39 am
@Roberta,
yeh but your good at what you do. I am forever indebt to editors who can turn my sloppy phrases and dumass analogies into readable sense.

When one loses the false "ownership" of a product, marvelous things can result. I find that the worst tech writers are some of my highly educated colleagues who will not get along with the editors.
In the USGS they have a style manual and thy employ very good eds who dont take prisoners with their publications. They even have strict rules about their map layouts and colors.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Apr, 2009 06:21 am
@Roberta,
If they pay you good money, I'll smile.
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Apr, 2009 06:44 am
@dlowan,
Yeah, me too.
0 Replies
 
mac11
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Apr, 2009 12:41 pm
Boida, too bad they don't pay per error found!
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Apr, 2009 12:46 pm
@Roberta,
Snighrling could catch on as a useful means of expression.
 

Related Topics

Oddities and Humor - Discussion by edgarblythe
Let's play "Caption the Photo" II - Discussion by gustavratzenhofer
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
Funny Pictures ***Slow Loading*** - Discussion by JerryR
Caption The Cartoon - Discussion by panzade
Geek and Nerd Humor - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Caption The Cartoon Part Deux - Discussion by panzade
IS IT OK FOR ME TO CHEAT? - Question by Setanta
2008 Election: Political Humor - Discussion by Robert Gentel
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 04:00:10