3
   

New roll-out (propaganda campaign) for war with Iran?

 
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Sep, 2007 12:08 pm
You don't get so far on rousing cheers.

What next?

I am independent minded. I'm a realist too. I know that I don't know anywhere near enough to make any snap judgements on these matters and that we have no choice other than to go along with the judgements which emerge from the massive bureaucratic pyramid which is staffed, one presumes, by some of your best and brightest who study, year in and year out, a flow of information of such proportions as to beggar belief.

What I have said to cause you to indulge your imagination in the particular manner you did I can't imagine. It was in the way of an extended assertion which seems to have run a bit out of control and obviously a well worn one.

The guy was sitting reading a book to kids in a classroom when they came in and blew his mind. What he might have imagined awaited him in the next hour or two hardly bears thinking about. He didn't know it was a one-shot lucky pot like we do now.

You wouldn't catch me with an avvie of a bloke in uniform which is the ultimate symbol of authority. Tooled up or otherwise.

We still await a rough outline of your policy for the future.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Sep, 2007 01:03 pm
I believe that Spendius is deliberately being a bit cranky and argumentative. However that is no worse than the overstatements and posturing that equally infects the prose of those here arguing with him.

For myself, I generally try to find, in everyone I encounter, here and elsewhere, something that I like. I try to resonate with that and tease them about the stuff I don't like. If I can find nothing at all likeable, I generally ignore them. Like all of the rest of us, I am here to amuse myself, not others.

With respect to the issue at hand, I believe that Blatham is incorrect in the following;
blatham wrote:
Quote:
I sometimes wonder what you would do if Mr Bush told you to shove the White House up your arse and went back to his ranch to goof off. It is hardly imaginable that the thought has never crossed his mind.

My goodness. You cannot be serious.

One assumes, first of all, that thoughts do cross the fellow's mind. It wouldn't be a long traverse, after all.

Secondly, most americans and almost everyone else in the world would throw out a rousing cheer if the fellow did precisely what you suggest in the first sentence.

You seem an independent-minded fellow, spendi. Yet a consistent theme runs through your statements here. You are a toadie to power, to authority. One would expect an independent mind to make discernments, to enjoy making discernments. But you look much happier when you are just kissing those rear ends of the folks who like you kissing their rear ends (and then spreading the word at how good the taste is).


It seems to me that Blatham's characterizations here are far too categorical and unbounded to be taken seriously by a thinking, discerning reader. Further there seems to be a bit of projection going on here as well. If spend is, as Blatham asserts, "a toady to power, to authority" (an assertion which I doubt seriously) then surely Blatham has amply demonstrated that he is an even worse toady to the conventional revealed truth of the liberal American chattering class of self-appointed commentators (a group notable more for its criticism and categorical damning of those it opposes, than any affirmative proposals of its own.).

This mode of behavior of course immunizes them from ever having to account for or deal with the failure of their own analysis or thinking. They refer only to vague concepts of "correct" thinking which are themselves postulated to be beyond reproach, leaving failures in their application to the accounts of inherent evils in the world or the machinations of those that oppose them, "corporations" and the like.

I have had just enough experience of accountability and power to have some sympathy for the man actually in the arena, burdened with the inescapable imperative of dealing with immediate and distant threats, compared to his critics in the audience who deal only in the abstract and who know neither defeat nor victory. I suspect that is in part what Spendi is telling us.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Sep, 2007 01:25 pm
george

This is now the third time I' ve had to ask you to answer that simple little question back there.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Sep, 2007 01:48 pm
spendi said
Quote:
I don't know anywhere near enough to make any snap judgements
Then learn more so you judgements aren't 'snap'.

Quote:
we have no choice other than to go along with the judgements which emerge from the massive bureaucratic pyramid
That's not realism, that's syncophancy and apathy.

Quote:
by some of your best and brightest who study, year in and year out, a flow of information of such proportions as to beggar belief.
And this follows immediately up on you describing yourself as a 'realist'!? This is a faith stance and a damned uneducated one at that. There is not a corner of this administration's bureacracy which isn't marked by incompetent political appointees.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Sep, 2007 03:38 pm
What you fail to appreciate Bernie is that we are all, by deep inward necessity "toadying" to the imperatives of our Christian (Faustian) Culture. It is the dynamic extension into space. The will in opposition to space and determined to overcome it. The lonesome ego likewise. And to perform this extension as efficiently as maybe.

It began in Northern Europe around 1,000 AD. The Gothic cathedrals reach for the stars. The Greek Parthenon only needs a head on the front to look a bit like an animal taking a dump. It squats on the landscape. The onion domes of the Kremlin are a compromise as you might expect with two cultural influences at work. They squat on the tower. The attempt to return to Classical ideals, the here and now with no autobiography and a mask for a persona, in the Renaissance was a mere affectation from the south and didn't take in the greatest of the artists. Perspective painting, the depiction of space, would be incomprehensible to the Greek mind. As would Shakespearean tragedy with its action springing from inside the characters rather than being visited upon them by outside agancies and, as such, could happen to anyone.

Our egos thrust. We seek to conquer. That's why we love to see the prow of a big ship parting the waves and lift-offs from the cape. It's in our blood. A creation of the Roman Catholic Church. Even Freud had a wrestle with it.

Only those who are oblivious to such considerations are "toadying" to those authorities flat out. And what I said there was a ridiculously oversimplified scratch at the surface.

You are acute to detect a note of apathy. It is not due to defeat, as most apathy is, an impression I presume you hoped to give, but due to a sense that our cultural style is not timeless and thus not truly human.

The real Spendius was a man of some action but he was fundamentally apathetic. His actions served only the pleasure /pain principle. Had he found a speedboat he would have been off like a shot.

Like stopping an aircraft carrier stopping the forces in motion in the service of the national interest as expressed, and rightly so, by its duly elected hierarchy, is a daunting task for any one individual. So much so that without ones hands on the levers it is tantamount to banging one's head against a wall.

So I think you are a frustrated thruster. You extend into space and there is little or no effect. I extend into space, like George said, for fun for myself and, with luck, for some like minded souls, and the best fun is taking the piss out of thrusters when they are the armchair variety.

It's pub time. Apathy City. Obsessions are a form of apathy.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Sep, 2007 04:48 pm
spendi: So I think you are a frustrated thruster. You extend into space and there is little or no effect. I extend into space, like George said, for fun for myself and, with luck, for some like minded souls, and the best fun is taking the piss out of thrusters when they are the armchair variety.

Come on, spendi, you're a bar stool funki on most threads you participate on a2k. As I've said many times on several threads you engage yourself in, you're one of my 'favorite' entertainment on a2k - even when your compositions don't make much sense. At other times, you possess an artistry of the English language that is unique, and it makes me smile.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Sep, 2007 05:31 pm
The pub was great tonight. I had to fight my way, push and shove anyway, to the interface but, being a regular, there was soon a foaming pint of John Smith's Extra Smooth at my disposal thanks to this wonderful economic system we have going and me being in tight with one of the barmaids.

There was a fantastic odour of hungry chomping and all around me were people shoving nutrient into their gullets. As a well brought up person I don't start the evening as early as most.

Investigating, it having been 5 hours since I last took on board any scran, it turned out that the Landlord had arranged two different curries and a chilli with rice and a hot pot. All in military sized billy cans and with plastic plates and spoons of the type not made in Sheffield. There was also a Sex Pistols type bunch of young lads, the lead singer in his underpants,singing Pretty Vacant, and thrusting as fast as he could go. Faustian energy on the loose so to speak.

One plumpish young lady came to the bar with her top clinging to her nipples like grim death and it took the Landlord, who went behind to pull his rank, 15 minutes to serve her although what she was doing buying drinks I can't imagine.

Maybe she was a feminist.

My ears are still ringing so if that doesn't make any sense you'll have to make allowances.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Sep, 2007 06:00 pm
spendi, We always make allowances for you! LOL
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Sep, 2007 07:43 pm
blatham wrote:
george

This is now the third time I' ve had to ask you to answer that simple little question back there.


OK. No Bernie, I can't categorically prove that the Bush Administration will not launch an attack on Iran. However, neither can I assert than a subsequent Administration headed by Hillary Clinton or even Denis Kucinich won't do it either.

I think the latter observation is perhaps critical. Kucinich may well be a reincarnated Hitler in the form of a weasel.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Sep, 2007 09:10 am
spendius wrote:
What you fail to appreciate Bernie is that we are all, by deep inward necessity "toadying" to the imperatives of our Christian (Faustian) Culture. It is the dynamic extension into space. The will in opposition to space and determined to overcome it. The lonesome ego likewise. And to perform this extension as efficiently as maybe.

It began in Northern Europe around 1,000 AD. The Gothic cathedrals reach for the stars. The Greek Parthenon only needs a head on the front to look a bit like an animal taking a dump. It squats on the landscape. The onion domes of the Kremlin are a compromise as you might expect with two cultural influences at work. They squat on the tower. The attempt to return to Classical ideals, the here and now with no autobiography and a mask for a persona, in the Renaissance was a mere affectation from the south and didn't take in the greatest of the artists. Perspective painting, the depiction of space, would be incomprehensible to the Greek mind. As would Shakespearean tragedy with its action springing from inside the characters rather than being visited upon them by outside agancies and, as such, could happen to anyone.

Our egos thrust. We seek to conquer. That's why we love to see the prow of a big ship parting the waves and lift-offs from the cape. It's in our blood. A creation of the Roman Catholic Church. Even Freud had a wrestle with it.

Only those who are oblivious to such considerations are "toadying" to those authorities flat out. And what I said there was a ridiculously oversimplified scratch at the surface.

You are acute to detect a note of apathy. It is not due to defeat, as most apathy is, an impression I presume you hoped to give, but due to a sense that our cultural style is not timeless and thus not truly human.

The real Spendius was a man of some action but he was fundamentally apathetic. His actions served only the pleasure /pain principle. Had he found a speedboat he would have been off like a shot.

Like stopping an aircraft carrier stopping the forces in motion in the service of the national interest as expressed, and rightly so, by its duly elected hierarchy, is a daunting task for any one individual. So much so that without ones hands on the levers it is tantamount to banging one's head against a wall.

So I think you are a frustrated thruster. You extend into space and there is little or no effect. I extend into space, like George said, for fun for myself and, with luck, for some like minded souls, and the best fun is taking the piss out of thrusters when they are the armchair variety.

It's pub time. Apathy City. Obsessions are a form of apathy.


spendi...you are a loveable coward. Perhaps you are frightened of looking/sounding a fool and thus avoid making any sort of statement that might be ammenable to disproof. Or maybe you avoid any serious hope knowing it will sink like a ship.

Fine. If your thesis is the overwhelming futility of any single human, or humans in toto, or even biological life, period....then that's fine. It's not as if there isn't a convincing argument to be made.

But you probably ought not to pretend that you yourself are off the existential hook merely through dedicating yourself to looking at others wriggle.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Sep, 2007 09:16 am
georgeob1 wrote:
blatham wrote:
george

This is now the third time I' ve had to ask you to answer that simple little question back there.


OK. No Bernie, I can't categorically prove that the Bush Administration will not launch an attack on Iran. However, neither can I assert than a subsequent Administration headed by Hillary Clinton or even Denis Kucinich won't do it either.

I think the latter observation is perhaps critical. Kucinich may well be a reincarnated Hitler in the form of a weasel.


Thankyou, george. I won't make you go back and rewrite the several posts which this admission now reveals were nonsensible. I'm a forgiving fellow.

But you've avoided a further, and necessary, discernment. It is clearly not the case that any upcoming Democratic administration will be as likely as this present one to wage wars of such magnitude and consequence.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Sep, 2007 09:18 am
In the space of a few posts the President of the United States of America has been likened, by c.i., to an amalgum of a Machiavellian prince, de Sade's Saint-Fond, Goldfinger, Hamilcar Barca and a range of other amorals.

By Bernie as the Chief Dipshit.

On a nearby thread there is a call for his trial and execution.

A presidential hopeful is, or "may be" (Hey George!) a reincarnated Hitler in the form of a weasel.

What on earth is happening?

It seems to me to be a welling up of guilt. The President, leader of the free world, as scapegoat. The unspoken, oft repressed, knowledge that what it takes to keep the American voter in the manner to which s/he has become accustomed is what his policy consists of, and what that voter voted for twice, and what his representitives voted overwhelmingly for, and which no credible opposition leader dares promise to reverse.

The Roman Senate gave their generals the order- "do whatever you think necessary to protect the Republic".

In a democracy the people are the Senate.

And he told you you had an addiction--and in a State of the Union address--not off the cuff--and "addiction" is a dirty word--a psychosis--and what has the voter done since except bay for an increased dose. The SF meeting being a trivial yet revealing incident in that regard.

Maybe "Dim", the slow witted brute force droog in Alex DeLarge's gang, is the name you are searching for with Alex as the personification of the voter.

And when the Frech declined to join the coalition they were villified in a media led blitz of hatred boycotts and insults.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Sep, 2007 09:26 am
georgeob1 wrote:
Kucinich may well be a reincarnated Hitler in the form of a weasel.


Sorry to interrupt your otherwise interesting conversation, but I have to declare my opposition to your other pet stance, which consists in comparing everybody you dislike to this cute little animal.

You are not doing justice to weasels...
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Sep, 2007 09:35 am
Bernie wrote-

Quote:
It is clearly not the case that any upcoming Democratic administration will be as likely as this present one to wage wars of such magnitude and consequence.


It is not clear to me.

And the phrase " will be as likely" rather detracts from any real meaning.

It was Democrats who ran Vietnam and Republicans who ended it. I have heard of nothing in Iraq to compare with a policy to defoliate large parts of the countryside with chemicals which continue to change the landscape, cause diseases and birth defects, and poison the food chain.

You need to provide actual scenarios Bernie before such an assertion can be scrutinised.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Sep, 2007 10:34 am
Quote:
more details at http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/30/us/politics/30watch.html?hp

OK. So this is a propaganda campaign designed, most immediately, to encourage the US government to wage war on Iran and to manufacture consent within the population for war on Iran. Many of the ususual suspects are involved, notably folks who've been influential in this adminstration along with the AEI and Israel lobby groups.

The sentence I've noted in red is, as Colin Powell pointed out earlier (and as anyone with one quarter of a functioning brain would recognize) designed not to reflect reality but to frighten. Phuck, I hate these pricks.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Sep, 2007 10:49 am
spendi

Here's one of those leaders we ought to trust...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=484762&in_page_id=1770
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Sep, 2007 12:37 pm
Proves nothing and I'm surprised you think it does.

They probably adjourned to a knees-up after the 2 minutes all that lot took. It might even have taken place during the knees-up.

Had you heard of Ms Cagan before?

How many other "officials" are at the equivalent level as a Deputy Assistant Secretary for ...

We all know how titles are used for vainglory purposes. And the lady does look to have a penchant for vainglory.

Quote:
one of President Bush's senior women officials.


Straw men are bad enough but clutching at one stalk is ridiculous.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Sep, 2007 12:40 pm
BTW Bernie-

Did you just happen across this item or were you pointed at it?
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Sep, 2007 12:42 pm
thats not Debra Cagan its Ahmadinejad sans beard in drag.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Sep, 2007 02:47 pm
Bernie,

I have nothing to rewrite. First you insist that I offer an assertion that one cannot prove that a stipulated future event will certainly not happen. That, of course is easy to do, since it is a virtual tautology. Then you insist that this somehow alters elements in the subsequent discussion. Now you insist that we accept postulated relative differences in the likelihood of this (unlikely) event in the cases of potential, but unnamed, Democrat governments. (An interesting assertion in that from WWI to WWII, Korea, and Vietnam, Democrat Administrations started our involvement in all these conflicts.)

Is there something in the Oregon fog that has affected your discernment?

Francis,

I was rather fond of my weasel characterization of Denis Kucinich. However, as you have noted, I am perhaps too given to metaphorical references to this rodent-like creature. How like a Frenchman to think they are cute !

All,

I found the story of the rather odd-looking Debra Cagan (where did she come from?) rather interesting - particularly the references to the effect of her words on the poor, poor British MPs, who evidently were so taken by her words that they all came down with the vapors. Poor dears!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/11/2025 at 10:07:15