1
   

Priest Charged for Jogging Naked

 
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 01:43 pm
I already said all that - what's your point?
0 Replies
 
happycat
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 01:45 pm
I'm just reiterating. It all seems pretty basic.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 01:46 pm
Why don't you ladies put on some light, clingy fabric and go for a jog around A2K? Smile
0 Replies
 
happycat
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 01:50 pm
cjhsa wrote:
Why don't you ladies put on some light, clingy fabric and go for a jog around A2K? Smile


I already did. You just weren't awake yet. Laughing
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 01:50 pm
happycat wrote:
despite all our proclamations to the contrary, we're still a bit puritan in this country.
With all the reports in the media lately about pedophiles, we are extra extra cautious.


Apart from all the rest, you seem to be saying here that it's okay if somebody gets labelled a sex offender due to archaic laws and public paranoia...

Sounds a bit Taliban to me....
0 Replies
 
happycat
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 01:53 pm
old europe wrote:
happycat wrote:
despite all our proclamations to the contrary, we're still a bit puritan in this country.
With all the reports in the media lately about pedophiles, we are extra extra cautious.


Apart from all the rest, you seem to be saying here that it's okay if somebody gets labelled a sex offender due to archaic laws and public paranoia...

Sounds a bit Taliban to me....


Well, unless the priest has been hiding in a cave for the past 30 years, I think he should know that what he's doing can and would be misconstrued.

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then chances are it's a duck.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 01:55 pm
happycat wrote:
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then chances are it's a duck.


So there have been many cases of nightly naked joggers who later turned out to be paedophiles?
0 Replies
 
happycat
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 01:59 pm
old europe wrote:
happycat wrote:
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then chances are it's a duck.


So there have been many cases of nightly naked joggers who later turned out to be paedophiles?


I don't know, but I just posed this thread topic to my high schooler and he said "that's creepy."

'nuff said
:wink:
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 02:00 pm
Exactly, oe. As I said earlier, the most he could honestly be charged with is indecent exposure. But from what I read, in that state, that charge is tied to paedophilia, which is certainly unfair and rather bizarre.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 02:02 pm
happycat wrote:
C'mon, a cop sees a naked guy running around the HIGH SCHOOL track in the middle of the night (4:30am is still almost the middle of the night,


cjhsa wrote:
An officer said he saw a naked man walking down the street at 4:35 a.m. The U.S. Naval Observatory Web site said sunrise that day in Frederick was 5:31 a.m.


not sure why people need to make stuff up when cjhsa posted the information at the beginning of the thread

~~~

Did Europeans or Canajuns ever think that Americans were other than puritanical?

It is occasionally something to wonder at.

~~~

Mame - we're a little more open-minded up here than you thought

Quote:
In 1996, the Ontario court of appeals ruled that women going topless did not imply indecent or sexual behaviour as defined by the Canadian criminal code (R. v. Jacobs, 1996). Similar rulings were made in Saskatchewan in 1998 and in British Columbia in 2000.
link
0 Replies
 
happycat
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 02:04 pm
Mame wrote:
Exactly, oe. As I said earlier, the most he could honestly be charged with is indecent exposure. But from what I read, in that state, that charge is tied to paedophilia, which is certainly unfair and rather bizarre.


What if, hypothetically, there was a 14 year old girl that wished to jog on the high school track at the same time?
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 02:06 pm
Well, that still doesn't make him a paedophile! It just makes his indiscretion or judgement even stupider.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 02:07 pm
This is the original (local) report:
Quote:
Publish Date: 8/9/2007

Source
Though I especially like this sentence ...
In a report taken by on-duty officer Donald Loveless, the off-duty officer specifically said he felt "alarmed" when he observed Whipkey's genitalia.

.... I really wonder why something from June 22 is published just now.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 02:08 pm
What's the problem with seeing a naked man?

It might be unexpected, but it's not a life-threatening thing, and certainly shouldn't be life-altering.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 02:10 pm
happycat wrote:


What if, hypothetically, there was a 14 year old girl that wished to jog on the high school track at the same time?


Well, a 14-year-old girl jogging in the dark at 4:30 am - even I would be alarmed by that!

Seriously, that would really lead me to call the police and the youth department.
0 Replies
 
happycat
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 02:12 pm
Mame wrote:
Well, that still doesn't make him a paedophile! It just makes his indiscretion or judgement even stupider.


It doesn't sound like Father Bob Rolling Eyes used very good judgement.
Right there, that's cause for alarm.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 02:13 pm
happycat wrote:
What if, hypothetically, there was a 14 year old girl that wished to jog on the high school track at the same time?


Ah.

I thought we were talking about this case. Not about some hypothetical case.

But okay.

I guess we can just throw in a couple of hypothetical circumstances until we can all agree that this guy should be labelled a sex offender.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 02:14 pm
walter wrote :

Quote:
"I really wonder why something from June 22 is published just now. "


a slow news day = saure gurkenzeit Laughing
perhaps the police officer was just trying to fill "his quota" - or he didn't like catholics Shocked ?
hbg
0 Replies
 
happycat
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 02:15 pm
I'm beginning to think that Walter and Mame just enjoy arguing.
0 Replies
 
happycat
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 02:17 pm
old europe wrote:
happycat wrote:
What if, hypothetically, there was a 14 year old girl that wished to jog on the high school track at the same time?


Ah.

I thought we were talking about this case. Not about some hypothetical case.

But okay.

I guess we can just throw in a couple of hypothetical circumstances until we can all agree that this guy should be labelled a sex offender.


No, I'm saying that maybe that would be a good reason for the police to NOT ALLOW naked men on the high school track.
Maybe they should post a sign so that everyone with no common sense will be sure to understand: NO NAKED JOGGING ALLOWED
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/06/2025 at 03:03:41