1
   

Is It Wise to TRUST Our Friends ?

 
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 05:17 pm
trust america.... hahahahahahaha, who would be such a fool! I guess you can 'love' a country, although it's a bloody cliche. Patriotism is patriotism, not the same kind of love that two people share.

And as for loving the ladies - that's one thing. You're saying you enjoyed their company. Did you really truly love one woman? can you do that without trust? because that i cannot imagine. And do not want to have to imagine. that love is not possible without trust in my mind.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 05:17 pm
dagmaraka wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
dagmaraka wrote:
Geeze, I'm sorry. That sounds sad.

My parents are the most wonderful people in this world
and my sister is my best friend.
I cannot imagine what it would feel like if it were otherwise.

I had a superb rapport and mental harmony with my mother,
whom I have always considered the very best mother
whom I have ever observed.

My mother earned my respect for her intellect and sound judgment.
She was my BEST advisor.

What I mentioned was a brief interruption
in that rapport.


so you do trust her then. you trust her advise, you rely on her, you love her. That's trust.

With all respect,
I must challenge your semantics and nomenclature.

I always knew that human behavior is unpredictable.
I certainly love her, knowing that all human behavior is unpredictable.
There WERE occasions upon which I trusted her,
e.g., at the beach committing my property into her possession,
while bathing. I was confident that she wud not steal it.
( I knew OTHER people whose parents robbed them.
Sometimes, I saw them DO it. )

As to trusting her advice,
I knew from observation and experience
that her advice was very VALUABLE,
but no one is right all the time.
It is not so much that I trusted her advice
as that I thought that chances were pretty good
that her suggested strategy was a usually a good idea.

When I lost my mother 's advice,
I lost a VERY GOOD sounding board, in the decision making process.
Too ofen, I regretted not having accepted my mother 's advice,
relying on my own reasoning.

That is not trust.
That is analysis of the probabilities.

Trust is confidence that something will or will not happen.
David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 05:31 pm
vikorr wrote:
Quote:
Let me be clear on one point:
I have never suggested that people shud not BEAR GOOD WILL
to their friends, nor have I suggested that we shud not enjoy their social company.
David

Odd reply. I was simply answering your question.

Quote:
And trusting friends brings friends closer together.

Cars and boats and planes can bring friends closer together;
trusting has nothing to do with it.



Quote:
Actually, would anyone call a person they didn't trust a 'friend'?

Yes.

I do that a lot, having good friends, trusting no one,
in that I am fully aware that human behavior is unpredictable.




Quote:

I would think that's what associates are.

Yes.
Associates r people with whom u associate.
U don 't necessarily LIKE them, nor respect them.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 05:34 pm
so far in my life every single person I have ever loved or trusted has eventually betrayed that love and trust.

I will not give up on love or trust though. I don't know why. I never considered myself stupid. Perhaps I should re think.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 05:37 pm
OmSigDAVID wrote:
dagmaraka wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
dagmaraka wrote:
Geeze, I'm sorry. That sounds sad.

My parents are the most wonderful people in this world
and my sister is my best friend.
I cannot imagine what it would feel like if it were otherwise.

I had a superb rapport and mental harmony with my mother,
whom I have always considered the very best mother
whom I have ever observed.

My mother earned my respect for her intellect and sound judgment.
She was my BEST advisor.

What I mentioned was a brief interruption
in that rapport.


so you do trust her then. you trust her advise, you rely on her, you love her. That's trust.

With all respect,
I must challenge your semantics and nomenclature.

I always knew that human behavior is unpredictable.
I certainly love her, knowing that all human behavior is unpredictable.
There WERE occasions upon which I trusted her,
e.g., at the beach committing my property into her possession,
while bathing. I was confident that she wud not steal it.
( I knew OTHER people whose parents robbed them.
Sometimes, I saw them DO it. )

As to trusting her advice,
I knew from observation and experience
that her advice was very VALUABLE,
but no one is right all the time.
It is not so much that I trusted her advice
as that I thought that chances were pretty good
that her suggested strategy was a usually a good idea.

When I lost my mother 's advice,
I lost a VERY GOOD sounding board, in the decision making process.
Too ofen, I regretted not having accepted my mother 's advice,
relying on my own reasoning.

That is not trust.
That is analysis of the probabilities.

Trust is confidence that something will or will not happen.
David


with all respect to YOU, sir, challenge your knowlege of semantics first. (btw, as for "my nomenclature" - I don't have one. I use the existing terminology. That's, like I said multiple times before, what consensus and norms, like definitions, are for. Otherwise we wouldn't be able to communicate.)

I am not the one who is making up definitions and then want to discuss them with others. What you describe perfectly fits the common definitions of trust. The fact that nobody is right all the time does not mean we cease to trust them. Trust does include evaluation and analysis. What you describe you feel towards your mother does indeed fit with the definition of trust. You may not like it, but that's an entirely separate matter. I suggest researching words before you throw them around.

Note: these are alternative meanings of the word trust. Not all of them at the same time. Read the post about your mother and compare:
Quote:
trust
n.
1. Firm reliance on the integrity, ability, or character of a person or thing.
2. Custody; care.
3. Something committed into the care of another; charge.
4.
a. The condition and resulting obligation of having confidence placed in one: violated a public trust.
b. One in which confidence is placed.
5. Reliance on something in the future; hope.
6. Reliance on the intention and ability of a purchaser to pay in the future; credit.
7. Law
a. A legal title to property held by one party for the benefit of another.
b. The confidence reposed in a trustee when giving the trustee legal title to property to administer for another, together with the trustee's obligation regarding that property and the beneficiary.
c. The property so held.
8. A combination of firms or corporations for the purpose of reducing competition and controlling prices throughout a business or an industry.
v. trust·ed, trust·ing, trusts
v.intr.
1. To have or place reliance; depend: Trust in the Lord. Trust to destiny.
2. To be confident; hope.
3. To sell on credit.
v.tr.
1. To have or place confidence in; depend on.
2. To expect with assurance; assume: I trust that you will be on time.
3. To believe: I trust what you say.
4. To place in the care of another; entrust.
5. To grant discretion to confidently: Can I trust them with the boat?
6. To extend credit to.
Idiom:
in trust
In the possession or care of a trustee.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 05:45 pm
dagmaraka wrote:


Quote:
Patriotism is patriotism, not the same kind of love that two people share.

And as for loving the ladies - that's one thing. You're saying you enjoyed their company.





Did you really truly love one woman?

Yes; for 22 years.




Quote:
can you do that without trust?

I can now, I cud then, and I DID,
fully knowing that the behavior of NO human being is predictable,
and is therefore not trustworthy, but CAN BE lovable.

Love is bearing good will, to a hi degree of intensity.






Quote:
because that i cannot imagine.
And do not want to have to imagine.
that love is not possible without trust in my mind.

Maybe u define it some different way.

I have defined love as being good will, to a hi degree of intensity.

Do u agree ?
or do u reject that ?

David
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 05:49 pm
Quote:
Maybe u define it some different way.

I have defined love as being good will, to a hi degree of intensity.

Do u agree ?
or do u reject that ?



it is not ME who defines things. definitions are terms agreed upon in common use. you'll find them in dictionaries and encyclopedias. If you start defining things on your own, as you have in this thread, you are bound to not be able to communicate well with people. because people operate with the commonly accepted definitions in their mind. Not those that YOU invent.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 05:58 pm
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
so far in my life every single person I have ever loved or trusted has eventually betrayed that love and trust.

I will not give up on love or trust though. I don't know why.
I never considered myself stupid. Perhaps I should re think.

Interesting that u bring that up, Bear.

My ex-friend, Marvin ( the most intelligent man whom I ever met, a superbrilliant engineer )
ofen asserted that human nature is such that, given enuf TIME,
ALL of everyone 's friends WILL eventually betray their confidence,
one way or another.


I used that argument, successfully,
to put my cousin Norma 's marriage back together again about 12 years ago.
I told her that her husband was made of human DNA, not an angel.
David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 06:08 pm
dagmaraka wrote:
Quote:
Maybe u define it some different way.

I have defined love as being good will, to a hi degree of intensity.

Do u agree ?
or do u reject that ?



it is not ME who defines things. definitions are terms agreed upon in common use. you'll find them in dictionaries and encyclopedias. If you start defining things on your own, as you have in this thread, you are bound to not be able to communicate well with people. because people operate with the commonly accepted definitions in their mind. Not those that YOU invent.

When u asked about love,
did u mean what I defined as my understanding of the concept ?

or something else ?

David
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 06:12 pm
of course not. why should i have meant your definition? i don't read minds. i go by standard definitions.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 06:34 pm
dagmaraka wrote:
of course not. why should i have meant your definition? i don't read minds.

i go by standard definitions.

OK, this is my last try:

Which is WHAT ???
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 06:36 pm
ok, last try: loot them up in encyclopedias or dictionnaries. or even bloody google.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 06:41 pm
Your goat does NOT sound very happy to Me.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 06:46 pm
it's not my goat. plus, who knows what you mean by 'happy'. could be anything, given your track record.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 07:05 pm
When u brought up the subject of love,
I defined it as good will, or liking, to a hi degree of intensity.

I believe that is NOT a controversial definition,
but u reject it, for no reason that I can think of.

U leave me confused n perplexed.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 07:22 pm
your thread is about trust. i never rejected your definition of love...though i thought it odd that you should first think of your country, but whatever. that's a diversion.

trust. that's what was discussed in majority of the posts on this thread, not love.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 07:58 pm
dagmaraka wrote:
trust america.... hahahahahahaha, who would be such a fool!
I guess you can 'love' a country, although it's a bloody cliche.
Patriotism is patriotism, not the same kind of love that two people share.

And as for loving the ladies - that's one thing. You're saying you enjoyed their company.
Did you really truly love one woman? can you do that without trust?
because that i cannot imagine.
And do not want to have to imagine.
that love is not possible without trust in my mind.

This is where u inquired about love
and went on to comment about love.


Strange that u choose to run away
from the commentary NOW.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 08:26 pm
i know what i wrote. that's one post on how many pages? and nowhere in it do i dispute your definition or disagree with it.

this here below is the definition of trust YOU said nothing about. who's running away?

dagmaraka wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
dagmaraka wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
dagmaraka wrote:
Geeze, I'm sorry. That sounds sad.

My parents are the most wonderful people in this world
and my sister is my best friend.
I cannot imagine what it would feel like if it were otherwise.

I had a superb rapport and mental harmony with my mother,
whom I have always considered the very best mother
whom I have ever observed.

My mother earned my respect for her intellect and sound judgment.
She was my BEST advisor.

What I mentioned was a brief interruption
in that rapport.


so you do trust her then. you trust her advise, you rely on her, you love her. That's trust.

With all respect,
I must challenge your semantics and nomenclature.

I always knew that human behavior is unpredictable.
I certainly love her, knowing that all human behavior is unpredictable.
There WERE occasions upon which I trusted her,
e.g., at the beach committing my property into her possession,
while bathing. I was confident that she wud not steal it.
( I knew OTHER people whose parents robbed them.
Sometimes, I saw them DO it. )

As to trusting her advice,
I knew from observation and experience
that her advice was very VALUABLE,
but no one is right all the time.
It is not so much that I trusted her advice
as that I thought that chances were pretty good
that her suggested strategy was a usually a good idea.

When I lost my mother 's advice,
I lost a VERY GOOD sounding board, in the decision making process.
Too ofen, I regretted not having accepted my mother 's advice,
relying on my own reasoning.

That is not trust.
That is analysis of the probabilities.

Trust is confidence that something will or will not happen.
David


with all respect to YOU, sir, challenge your knowlege of semantics first. (btw, as for "my nomenclature" - I don't have one. I use the existing terminology. That's, like I said multiple times before, what consensus and norms, like definitions, are for. Otherwise we wouldn't be able to communicate.)

I am not the one who is making up definitions and then want to discuss them with others. What you describe perfectly fits the common definitions of trust. The fact that nobody is right all the time does not mean we cease to trust them. Trust does include evaluation and analysis. What you describe you feel towards your mother does indeed fit with the definition of trust. You may not like it, but that's an entirely separate matter. I suggest researching words before you throw them around.

Note: these are alternative meanings of the word trust. Not all of them at the same time. Read the post about your mother and compare:
Quote:
trust
n.
1. Firm reliance on the integrity, ability, or character of a person or thing.
2. Custody; care.
3. Something committed into the care of another; charge.
4.
a. The condition and resulting obligation of having confidence placed in one: violated a public trust.
b. One in which confidence is placed.
5. Reliance on something in the future; hope.
6. Reliance on the intention and ability of a purchaser to pay in the future; credit.
7. Law
a. A legal title to property held by one party for the benefit of another.
b. The confidence reposed in a trustee when giving the trustee legal title to property to administer for another, together with the trustee's obligation regarding that property and the beneficiary.
c. The property so held.
8. A combination of firms or corporations for the purpose of reducing competition and controlling prices throughout a business or an industry.
v. trust·ed, trust·ing, trusts
v.intr.
1. To have or place reliance; depend: Trust in the Lord. Trust to destiny.
2. To be confident; hope.
3. To sell on credit.
v.tr.
1. To have or place confidence in; depend on.
2. To expect with assurance; assume: I trust that you will be on time.
3. To believe: I trust what you say.
4. To place in the care of another; entrust.
5. To grant discretion to confidently: Can I trust them with the boat?
6. To extend credit to.
Idiom:
in trust
In the possession or care of a trustee.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 09:51 pm
I agree with part of that definition of trust.




As a libertarian, classical liberal,
I have no wish to coerce anyone into discussing
anything that he wishes to avoid.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 10:08 pm
and as a social democrat i have no wish to coerce anyone into discussing anything which he wishes to avoid either.... (though i have no idea why you bring your political conviction into it)...

i talked to you plenty more than anyone else and certainly did not avoid or wish to avoid anything. YOU have decided i was challenging your definition of love. which is just not true, as i have already said at least twice, nowhere did i disagree with you on love. i ASKED you about it, which is entirely different. what i disagreed with was your definition of TRUST. you finally read the definition a quoted and you say you agree with part of it. As far as i'm concerned, the case is closed.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 10:05:26