1
   

Is It Wise to TRUST Our Friends ?

 
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 09:06 am
No kidding.

Studies show that good friendships/ social networks are the best predictor of individual happiness. Lots of friends + basic needs met = happy. Very few or no friends + huge amounts of money = unhappy.

Of course you don't want to just leap into things -- I met you on the internet and you seem nice so I will give you my bank account and social security numbers!! But for people you have gotten to know well and have reason to trust, trust away.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 09:14 am
My dearest friend and I have been together since high school. That's 37 years. My second dearest and I, since 1985.
I trust these women with my life. My man. And all of my digits. Laughing
I'm just a lucky so-and-so.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 09:42 am
dagmaraka wrote:


Quote:
trust and cooperation are necessary to a vibrant civil society.
without it, there is backstabbing,

Do u imply that TRUST
will prevent backstabbing ?




Quote:
clientelism,

What 's that ?




Quote:
stealing on a mass scale.

I DOUBT that trust prevents stealing, Dag.




Quote:


there was a popular slogan known to every last soul during communis:
if you don't steal from the state, you steal from your family.
mistrust and fear lead to a deconstruction of society.

Please note that I recommended against TRUST.
I did NOT suggest nor promote fear.

I also recommend against FEAR; it is not your friend.
I am not trustful, but I am very seldom in a state of fear.



Quote:

is it wise to trust? to me, absolutely.
i'd much rather get betrayed a few times than live with mistrust.

what a miserable life that must be.

I have empirical evidence that withholding of trust
does NOT give rise to misery, nor to any discomfort.

Just plan DEFENSIVELY.

David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 09:45 am
eoe wrote:
My dearest friend and I have been together since high school.
That's 37 years.
My second dearest and I, since 1985.
I trust these women with my life. My man.

And all of my digits. Laughing
I'm just a lucky so-and-so.

U r saying that u trust them with your fingers ?
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 09:53 am
sozobe wrote:
No kidding.

Quote:
Studies show that good friendships/ social networks are the best predictor of individual happiness.

Please note that I did NOT recommend against
having good friendships, nor against social networks.

I merely suggest that ( in service of your personal security ) u don 't TRUST them
( or keep trust to a minimum ). U can still have fun with them ( just watch your back and your wallet ).
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 10:02 am
OmSigDAVID wrote:
eoe wrote:
My dearest friend and I have been together since high school.
That's 37 years.
My second dearest and I, since 1985.
I trust these women with my life. My man.

And all of my digits. Laughing
I'm just a lucky so-and-so.

U r saying that u trust them with your fingers ?


yep. funny you should mention fingers. I was at my second best friend's house a few years ago and I burned a few fingers on my right hand with steam from a boiling tea kettle. I could have dropped the kettle in the sink but a pair of beautiful antique wine glasses we'd used the night before were still in the sink so, I didn't drop it, taking the pain. She applied cool lavendar and looked me in the eye. "Next time," she said "drop the damn kettle, okay?"
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 10:14 am
eoe wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
eoe wrote:
My dearest friend and I have been together since high school.
That's 37 years.
My second dearest and I, since 1985.
I trust these women with my life. My man.

And all of my digits. Laughing
I'm just a lucky so-and-so.

U r saying that u trust them with your fingers ?


Quote:
yep. funny you should mention fingers.

I was following up.
U said: " And all of my digits. "





Quote:

I was at my second best friend's house a few years ago and I burned a
few fingers on my right hand with steam from a boiling tea kettle.
I could have dropped the kettle in the sink but a pair of beautiful antique wine glasses
we'd used the night before were still in the sink so, I didn't drop it,
taking the pain. She applied cool lavendar and looked me in the eye.
"Next time, drop the damn kettle, okay?"

U r a good friend.
David
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 10:16 am
They were beautiful glasses. Very Happy

By digits I mean numbers, SS#, credit card #'s, security code to my home, etc.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 10:27 am
Trust is an abstract concept. So is friendship. Should the two go together? I think it can go together based on what third abstract concept one subscribes to.
If one subscribes to mistrust, then the answer is obvious.
If one subscribes to virtue in one's beliefs, then one can trust, and accept any disappointments.
It's all up to each individual I think.
Some societies trust more than others (like the Smurfs; fictional, but it makes a point).
Probably a degree of trust is needed in all societies to make them work. Probably those who have been disappointed continually, in where they placed their trust, have emotional baggage as a consequence.
But then again, some people are totally resilient, or at least more than many others.
It's all a personal orientation to one's own life with personal experiences and genetics thrown in.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 11:23 am
eoe wrote:



Quote:
They were beautiful glasses. Very Happy

Then I 'm glad that u saved them.



Quote:

By digits I mean numbers, SS#, credit card #'s, security code to my home, etc.

O, I c.

David
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 11:26 am
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Amigo wrote:
It is not wise to trust your friends if they are not trustworthy. But why would you have friends that weren't trustworhty? And why don't they trust you.

It is materialism in decay, at the stage of disregard of right and wrong. It's a natural course. Look at the youth.

U miss the point.

U find out that thay r not trustworthy AFTER thay have betrayed u.

Wud George Washington have given the plans to West Point
to Benedict Arnold if he considered him to be untrustworthy ?

Maybe I shud have named this thread:
" Shud everyone ASSUME that no one is trustworthy ? "
Your right.....this time.

But In will be back.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 11:53 am
Foofie wrote:


Quote:
Trust is an abstract concept.

Trust is a BELIEF that someone or something will, or will not, act in certain ways.


Quote:
So is friendship. Should the two go together?

NO.
U can trust someone to be HORRIBLE, based upon experience.
U might choose not to have such a trusted person as a friend.





Quote:
I think it can go together based on what third abstract concept one subscribes to.
If one subscribes to mistrust, then the answer is obvious.

It is not obvious.

U can simply keep an open mind as to whether someone
whom u DO or do NOT trust
will stab u in the back, or not; adopt a wait and see attitude.
DON 'T PRE-JUDGE THE OUTCOME.

It is wise to plan defensively, tho.




Quote:
If one subscribes to virtue
in one's beliefs, then one can trust, and accept any disappointments.

Please explain what VIRTUE has to do with trust ?




Quote:
It's all up to each individual I think.

Yes.
Everyone is free to believe whatever he wants.






Quote:
Some societies trust more than others (like the Smurfs; fictional, but it makes a point).

What is their societal philosophy of trust ?


Quote:
Probably those who have been disappointed continually,
in where they placed their trust, have emotional baggage as a consequence.

When I was 11, over half a century ago,
some of my property was stolen by a 13 year old boy
within whose reach I had briefly left it,
against my better judgment.

I then learned that I shud not trust anyone with more than I am willing to lose.
It was a valuable lesson.
Once was enuf for the point to be made.
Since then, I have kept an open mind as whether people
will be honest or not.






Quote:

But then again, some people are totally resilient,
or at least more than many others.

What has RESILIANCE to do with trust ??

The question is whether u learn your lesson
when the facts of human nature reveal themselves in front of u.




Quote:

It's all a personal orientation to one's own life with personal experiences and genetics thrown in.

This has to do with logical analysis of objective facts.
What do genetics have to do with it ?

David
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 11:55 am
Quote:
Shud everyone ASSUME that no one is trustworthy


To thine ownself be true. Believe in yourself...trust yourself.
All others should be treated as "untrustworthy"... Cool
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 11:59 am
Miller wrote:
Quote:
Shud everyone ASSUME that no one is trustworthy


To thine ownself be true. Believe in yourself...trust yourself.
All others should be treated as "untrustworthy"... Cool

I don 't trust myself, either, Doctor.

On too many occasions,
I have resolved to do something,
or to remember something, and then I did not.


Q. E. D.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 12:01 pm
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Miller wrote:
Quote:
Shud everyone ASSUME that no one is trustworthy


To thine ownself be true. Believe in yourself...trust yourself.
All others should be treated as "untrustworthy"... Cool

I don 't trust myself, either, Doctor.

On too many occasions,
I have resolved to do something,
or to remember something, and then I did not.


Q. E. D.


It's perfectly normal to not trust yourself. The important thing is to acknowledge this trait and act accordingly.
0 Replies
 
massmutual
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 12:06 pm
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Miller wrote:
Quote:
Shud everyone ASSUME that no one is trustworthy


To thine ownself be true. Believe in yourself...trust yourself.
All others should be treated as "untrustworthy"... Cool

I don 't trust myself, either, Doctor.

On too many occasions,
I have resolved to do something,
or to remember something, and then I did not.


Q. E. D.


no prob there, prob starts when you got no CLUE who the heck you ARE at any one time, like some guys here right on this thread !!
0 Replies
 
massmutual
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 12:07 pm
Miller wrote:

................................

It's perfectly normal to not trust yourself. The important thing is to acknowledge this trait and act accordingly.


another fr instance right here lol !
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 02:24 pm
Miller wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Miller wrote:
Quote:
Shud everyone ASSUME that no one is trustworthy


To thine ownself be true. Believe in yourself...trust yourself.
All others should be treated as "untrustworthy"... Cool

I don 't trust myself, either, Doctor.

On too many occasions,
I have resolved to do something,
or to remember something, and then I did not.


Q. E. D.


It's perfectly normal to not trust yourself. The important thing is to acknowledge this trait and act accordingly.

Yes; like writing things down,
or taping them on your cell fone, so u 'll remember.

I have had it happen, too many times
that while I 'm driving along, I get an idea to Google something,
by way of research, but then I forget what it was; frustrating.
David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 02:39 pm
massmutual wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Miller wrote:
Quote:
Shud everyone ASSUME that no one is trustworthy


To thine ownself be true. Believe in yourself...trust yourself.
All others should be treated as "untrustworthy"... Cool

I don 't trust myself, either, Doctor.

On too many occasions,
I have resolved to do something,
or to remember something, and then I did not.


Q. E. D.


no prob there, prob starts when you got no CLUE who the heck you ARE at any one time,
like some guys here right on this thread !!

I had that happen once, a few decades ago.

I was at home, in bed in the dark of the nite, very tired.
I had been travelling a lot, to different cities, different hotels.
I awoke from a very deep sleep, in need of sanitary relief,
and tried to remember on what side of the bed I shud get out.
I cud not remember WHERE I was;
then, I found that I cud not remember WHO I was;
( nor cud I remember who I wud become in the future ).
After a while, I figured it out; I was me.
David
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Aug, 2007 02:49 pm
That happend to me too. I had been travaling from city to city nonstop. Hotel to Hotel, The same chain everytime. Same picture on the wall, same bedspread, same wallpaper. Work, hotel, drive, work, hotel, drive, work hotel, drive,

Some times two hotels in one day.

Then one day I woke up half asleep and I didn't where I had been or what I was doing or where I was at (who I was).

Like purgatory, weird. I was like that for five minutes and I was young.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/15/2025 at 01:37:56