Indications are that we'll win, but there's one little thing

Hillary's voice bothers me because I hear it as controlling. I pick this 'controlling' aspect up in male or female voices. Might have something to do with people in my past who seem to always speak with weighed words..

I don't know if that quality bothers nimh.

(I will vote for Hillary if she is the nominee.)

Hillary's voice bothers me because I hear it as controlling. I pick this 'controlling' aspect up in male or female voices. Might have something to do with people in my past who seem to always speak with weighed words..

I don't know if that quality bothers nimh.

(I will vote for Hillary if she is the nominee.)

In any case, I wouldn't vote based on voice.

I don't know, for me the voice of Dennis Kocinich is like nails on a blackboard and he's a guy...isn't he?

Ditto Harry Reid. Looking and listening to him makes my hair hurt as I marvel that somehow the Dems have discovered the secrets of Dr. Moreau and did their best work on a toad.

You know, without all of deliberate and concerted efforts to cast Newt Gingrich as Satan's spawn, you might feel entirely different about him.

ossobuco wrote:

Hillary's voice bothers me because I hear it as controlling. I pick this 'controlling' aspect up in male or female voices. Might have something to do with people in my past who seem to always speak with weighed words..

I don't know if that quality bothers nimh.

(I will vote for Hillary if she is the nominee.)

Perhaps you don't like uppity women. BTW, the recently released letters by her show that she is quite human, and decent.

Take the repeated 'complaint' that Hillary is 'ambitious'.

blatham wrote:

Take the repeated 'complaint' that Hillary is 'ambitious'.

You have to admit that's a valid complaint though. You and I would both prefer "the Dude" from "The Big Lebowski" in the White House.

I find the timing of the release of those letters to be suspicious.
The man that had them hadnt spoken to Hillary in 30+ years,but he still had the letters?
And all of a sudden the NYTimes finds him and he just "gives" them the letters?

That seems to convenient to me.

Besides a quick receiving-line greeting from Mrs. Clinton at the reunion, Mr. Peavoy has had just one direct contact with her in 38 years. It was, fittingly, by letter, only this time her words were more businesslike.

In the late 1990s, Mr. Peavoy was contacted by the author Gail Sheehy, who was researching a book on the first lady. He agreed to let Ms. Sheehy see the letters, from which she would quote snippets in her 1999 biography, "Hillary's Choice." When Mrs. Clinton heard that Mr. Peavoy had kept her old letters, she wrote him asking for copies, which he obliged. He has not heard from her since.

Wait, I AM an uppity woman...

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

I don't know, for me the voice of Dennis Kocinich is like nails on a blackboard and he's a guy...isn't he?

Ditto Harry Reid. Looking and listening to him makes my hair hurt as I marvel that somehow the Dems have discovered the secrets of Dr. Moreau and did their best work on a toad.

You know, without all of deliberate and concerted efforts to cast Newt Gingrich as Satan's spawn, you might feel entirely different about him.

Gingrich. How could anyone hold anything other than deep respect for the man, for his integrity and most particularly, for the quality of 'character'. I recall in 1996 his appearance on Meet The Press where he observed that the Clintons and their staffs were throwbacks to the 1960s counterculture - immoral, self-indulgent, irresponsible, perverse, not really to be trusted. And after that appearance (or the next day or the day after that) Newt ejaculated into or onto the House staffer, 20 years his junior, with whom he was having an on-going affair while his wife was in the hospital.

Can't we agree that they both suck?

Cycloptichorn