0
   

Mom and Chatty Toddler Removed From Flight

 
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:23 pm
sozobe wrote:
(What did she say after the "kind of like this..." ellipses? What I read was an addition that was something like, "...but not so bad." What I read may have been inaccurate, of course.)


I think this is part of the "the mother's story doesn't support the mother's story" argument.

She does appear to have said different things in different interviews. Or at least, slightly different things.

~~~

I actually think this is quite a bit like the other case that's come up a couple of times (the toddler/seat issue) - it seems to be more about the parent/parents' interaction with the attendant than anything to do directly with the child.
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:23 pm
I have also been an adult without children and one with child and I can honestly say that I had no clue as to how kids worked until I had one of my own.
I had many opinion including the fact that I thought parents could actually control their kids, that is, until I had one.
Some kids are naturally quiet and well behaved, some kids are just restless, some kids are off the walls, and some kids are restless, like the one we're talking about here.
From what I saw in the video, the kid was restless, but not that bad.
Most kids have tons of energy and it's very difficult to get them to sit still in any situation which requires them to stay that way for a fair amount of time and there's no controlling this.
As a parent, all you can do is try to keep them busy and distracted when they are forced to stop their energy filled bodies.
I was a ball of energy when I was a kid and I still am at 43 Shocked

Unless the kid was totally out of control, the airline has a lot of explaining to do.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:24 pm
Linkat wrote:
I know because I have been both childless as an adult and with children as an adult. When I did not have children, I did not comprehend everything involved with a child and there is no way to fully comprehend how to raise and handle children until you have one of your own - period.

I offered no opinions on how to raise a child. I didn't even offer any opinions on how a child should behave himself on an airplane. In fact, I didn't offer any opinions about the kid at all. The only thing I said about him is that he was as fussy on the plane as he was on the set of GMA -- and that's because his mother admitted as much.

Linkat wrote:
And I don't think your opinion is any less - just simply lacking in not experiencing a portion of it.

My opinion is good, it's just lacking? What the hell is that supposed to mean?

I would just add that the mother gave the same BS argument about the flight attendant:

Quote:
Soon after, she added, the flight attendant informed the passengers that the plane was turning around and told the mother and child, "You're getting off the plane."

Penland said, "She obviously does not have children."

I'll venture to guess that Penland has never been a flight attendant either, but that didn't stop her from offering some criticism of her own.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:25 pm
sozobe wrote:
The person was saying that it was a regional jet, which is usually where newbies start and get more experience before going on to the larger ones, and that there's a lot of movement so that attendants and pilots don't really get to know each other well. If an attendant reports that she's being threatened, a pilot is likely to go with that -- and then if it turns out that she was lying/ exaggerating, she'd probably be fired.


This is ... well, not tue.

ExpressJet is a regional airlöine, they don't have larger planes, they don't do long flights.

Pilots on those regional airlines are as experienced as others.
I don't know about this airline but here in Europe flight attendants and pilots of regional airlines know each other quite well - because there aren't so many in those airlines.

(44 planes operate as XJet, with 24 destinations.)
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:27 pm
Why do airlines let kids stay in the cabin with the regular people on planes anyway? I think people should have to drug their kids, put them in one of those pet carriers/cages that they have, and then have them stowed with the luggage. It's the only sensible solution, in my opinion.
0 Replies
 
Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:27 pm
Montana wrote:
I have also been an adult without children and one with child and I can honestly say that I had no clue as to how kids worked until I had one of my own.
I had many opinion including the fact that I thought parents could actually control their kids, that is, until I had one.
Some kids are naturally quiet and well behaved, some kids are just restless, some kids are off the walls, and some kids are restless, like the one we're talking about here.
From what I saw in the video, the kid was restless, but not that bad.
Most kids have tons of energy and it's very difficult to get them to sit still in any situation which requires them to stay that way for a fair amount of time and there's no controlling this.
As a parent, all you can do is try to keep them busy and distracted when they are forced to stop their energy filled bodies.
I was a ball of energy when I was a kid and I still am at 43 Shocked

Unless the kid was totally out of control, the airline has a lot of explaining to do.


When my daughter was a toddler, her doctor explained the energy level like this - a toddler exudes more energy than a professional athlete.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:28 pm
Express Jet is connected with Continental.

http://www.expressjet.com/partners/continental.htm
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:30 pm
sozobe wrote:
And you've accepted "the mother said so" as evidence throughout, of course...

I accept it when she is admitting something that is not in her self-interest. As FreeDuck points out, after the interview the mother qualified her previous admission by saying that her son wasn't "as adventurous" on the plane as he was on the set, but presumably she'd had time to reflect on what she was saying at that point. During the interview, however, she spontaneously admitted that the kid was just as "fussy" on the plane as he was on the set. That I believe.

sozobe wrote:
(What did she say after the "kind of like this..." ellipses? What I read was an addition that was something like, "...but not so bad." What I read may have been inaccurate, of course.)

No ellipsis in the article I linked. And the video confirms that was her entire statement.
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:33 pm
Linkat wrote:


When my daughter was a toddler, her doctor explained the energy level like this - a toddler exudes more energy than a professional athlete.


I hear that! I'm just thankful that my son didn't have the energy I had.

Poor mom did some running after I learned to walk, which I made sure I was doing early. Hell, even when I was still crawling, I was cookin and so was mom Shocked
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:33 pm
joefromchicago wrote:

I would just add that the mother gave the same BS argument about the flight attendant:

Quote:
Soon after, she added, the flight attendant informed the passengers that the plane was turning around and told the mother and child, "You're getting off the plane."

Penland said, "She obviously does not have children."

I'll venture to guess that Penland has never been a flight attendant either, but that didn't stop her from offering some criticism of her own.


This goes to my point that the opinion of the other passengers is irrelevant. Unless any of them can state (as fact, not opinion) that the FA did not feel the safety of the passengers was at risk due to the behavior of the mother and/or child then their opinion has no bearing. If she comes forward and says that her reaction was based on her headache and not the safety of the passengers then I'll get off the fence.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:38 pm
sozobe wrote:
Express Jet is connected with Continental.

http://www.expressjet.com/partners/continental.htm


I don't doubt that. (I flew 'Lufthansa' to and from USA - all with an United number, and I had a United ticket.)
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:38 pm
JPB, Excellent point; the safety of the passengers comes first. The problem in trying to reconcile this incident is not knowing exactly what made the pilot go back to the terminal, and whether his judgement was rational or in compliance with the rules under the circumstances.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:39 pm
I have flown in and out of Frankfurt often with Lufthansa/United, and have experienced the same thing as Walter.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:40 pm
ehBeth wrote:
I think this is part of the "the mother's story doesn't support the mother's story" argument.

She does appear to have said different things in different interviews. Or at least, slightly different things.


Very slightly, if that. (More below.)

joefromchicago wrote:
The only thing I said about him is that he was as fussy on the plane as he was on the set of GMA -- and that's because his mother admitted as much.


Actually, you said:

[quote="The only things we know about the kid is that his "fussing" on the set of GMA was at least at the same level as his "fussing" on the plane.[/quote]

Emphasis added. We don't in fact "know" that even from what the mother has said. The two quotes we have on that so far are "kind of like this," and "He wasn't quite that adventurous on the plane."

I accept that if the mother's statements are themselves contradictory that means something -- but I don't think those two statements are inherently contradictory.

joefromchicago wrote:
the kid was just as "fussy" on the plane as he was on the set


You're doing it again. "Kind of like this" does not equal "just as 'fussy' on the plane as he was on the set."

Meanwhile, why is that at issue? We've already agreed that even if he was just as fussy on the plane as on the set, it wasn't cause for him and his mother to be evicted from the plane.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:41 pm
sozobe wrote:
(What did she say after the "kind of like this..." ellipses? What I read was an addition that was something like, "...but not so bad." What I read may have been inaccurate, of course.)

The whole sentence is: "When we first boarded, he was a little fuzzy, kinda like this ... this is exactly what he was..." Interviewer (interrupts) Well I feel like this in the morning ..." Nothing in the interview indicates he was "kinda like this" during the "bye bye airplane" scene.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:42 pm
Thanks, Thomas.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:44 pm
I should have listened beyond the interviewer's interruption. The mother then says "... but once he saw the airplane and said bye bye plane, he was calm."
0 Replies
 
Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 12:47 pm
joefromchicago wrote:
Linkat wrote:

Linkat wrote:
And I don't think your opinion is any less - just simply lacking in not experiencing a portion of it.

My opinion is good, it's just lacking? What the hell is that supposed to mean?



You keep twisting things I say - I never said your opinion is lacking directly as you are twisting it - you never experienced raising a child, therefore you never experienced a child needing to be distracted. You never had a child trying to get your constant attention. Even teachers who have excellent experience with children - if they haven't had a child on their own - they go home afterwards. A parent's job is 24/7 - a child especially at that age vies for your attention every waking hour. You can't fully understand it if you don't experience it yourself.

As a parent - I really have no patience with parents that do not try to distract their child in certain situations like this. I fly frequently with my children and have a whole bag of "surprises" I bring with me.

I also have not taken one side over the other - other than other passengers speaking up in support leans me towards the child and parent rather than the flight attendant. I also would like to hear more first.

In a slightly different case, I did side a bit more with the airline - the case where the 3 year old girl was not properly seated and belted (seatbelted that is) in. That was strictly a safety rule issue whereas the child was not fasten in - the parents could have fasten her in and they did not comply.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 01:08 pm
I found the
blog I was referring to earlier, I didn't paraphrase very well. Two different pieces of info from two different posters (one who wrote the blog, one who responded), usual disclaimers apply but will quote to correct my faulty paraphrase:

Quote:
It also means that I know the drill for having someone removed from a plane. The Captain (pilot) is completely in charge of the plane. After all, he's got your life in his hands. So if he says you're off the plane, you're off. Just like that. No questions asked. The thing is, the pilots mostly stay up in the cockpit, flying the airplane. For which we should be glad. But that means that they're not exactly privy to all that goes on in "the back", where the unwashed masses passengers are. So who's really in charge back there? Why, the flight attendants, of course. Which means that if one doesn't take a shine to you, for whatever reason, there's a chance she/he can convince Mr. Bigshot Pilot to have you thrown off. Because he's got to make a snap judgment, along with pushing buttons and levers and talking to the tower and calculating how much fuel they have and using words like "vector" and thinking about the fight he had with his wife or the flight attendant he'd like to boink or maybe both, based on what some flight attendant, who chances are he's never even worked with before because pilot crews and flight attendant crews travel in different circles, is telling him. And he's got, like, maybe seconds to do this.


Quote:
On the flipside, it was a regional jet and the pilots and FA's on those flights are typically underpaid and somewhat inexperienced. The regional jets are somewhat of a training ground for flight crews until they gain enough flight time and experience to graduate to the major airlines. So maybe it is true; we won't know until the airline makes a statement about the events.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 01:17 pm
sozobe wrote:
Quote:
On the flipside, it was a regional jet and the pilots and FA's on those flights are typically underpaid and somewhat inexperienced. The regional jets are somewhat of a training ground for flight crews until they gain enough flight time and experience to graduate to the major airlines. So maybe it is true; we won't know until the airline makes a statement about the events.


I had no idea that this is the situation in the USA.

It's a bit different here, mainly re "training ground", less re diffrent tariffs.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/15/2025 at 07:46:39