Bolton and the UN

Anyone know how we got paid back for the rebuilding of Europe?
We didn't.

The US-- responsible for the world. Period.

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: May 14, 2005
Filed at 3:54 a.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Senate consideration of John R. Bolton to be ambassador to the United Nations is unlikely before the end of May because of Democratic objections to an earlier vote, Majority Leader Bill Frist's spokesman says.

The White House, in pushing for confirmation, contends that Bolton is needed badly and promptly at the United Nations to work on reform of the institution.

But Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., said Democrats were holding up the nomination to compel the State Department to provide more information about Bolton, now an undersecretary of state.

Bob Stevenson, spokesman for Frist, R-Tenn., said it was ''an ominous signal,'' but that talks would be held with the Democrats to try to work out arrangements for bringing the nomination to the floor later this month.

At the State Department, spokesman Richard Boucher indicated the Democrats' demands for more Bolton documents would not be met. ''We think that we have provided everything that is relevant to this nomination,'' he said.

President Bush's nomination of Bolton was voted out of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee 10-8 on Thursday without an endorsement, and Democrats vowed to take their fight to the Senate floor.

Boxer told The Associated Press on Friday she would use procedural delays until Democrats receive the requested information.

''It is not fair to bring this nomination to the floor for debate and a vote until all the information has been delivered,'' she said.

Boxer said the Democrats want to know if Bolton sought the names of American officials whose communications were intercepted by U.S. intelligence, details on the private business activities of a Bolton assistant, Matthew Friedman; and the circumstances of a tough Bolton speech on Syria.

Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., who is leading the drive to scuttle the nomination, is backing Boxer's request for a hold, a legislative device to keep the Republican leadership from beginning debate, spokesman Norm Kurz said.

Asked to assess Bolton's chances of being confirmed, Boxer said, ''I think we can definitely beat John Bolton because, I think, the American people are going to weigh in and make their views known.''

She said she would lift the hold when the Democrats received the requested information. But, she said, ''all options are on the table, including a filibuster.''

Boucher said the State Department had cooperated ''very extensively'' with the committee, but that ''there are certain kinds of requests that we don't feel comfortable producing.''

The reason, he said, was that providing internal communications, e-mails and notes to Congress would have a ''chilling effect'' on exchanges among officials in the department.

And yet, Boucher said, ''we don't want to turn this into a showdown between branches of government.''

There are 55 Republican senators, 44 Democrats and 1 independent. One Republican, George Voinovich of Ohio, said Thursday he intends to vote against confirmation of Bolton.

Voinovich's reservations about Bolton -- he called him ''the poster child of what someone in the diplomatic corps should not be'' -- prompted the Foreign Relations committee not to endorse his nomination while sending it to the full Senate.

Still, the White House said it was confident Bolton would be confirmed.

''We believe there is a majority of the Senate that agrees with the president that John Bolton is exactly the person we need at the United Nations during this critical time of reform,'' press secretary Scott McClellan said.

Democrats Move to Slow Action on Bolton


The White House, in pushing for confirmation, contends that Bolton is needed badly and promptly at the United Nations to work on reform of the institution.

It is done. John Bolton is in.

This is one of those rare occasions when Republican Senators are going to have to stand and be counted. The importance of President Bush having his way here is far more important than the job to be filled.

John Bolton will be confirmed....

The President has spoken.

I got all excited, thinking that Michael Bolton was finally getting the kind of international power and respect that he so rightly deserves. How disappointed I am!

Yes. By week's end (or this time next week), we'll all be referring to AMBASSADOR Bolton.



<Has a nice ring>

John Bolton clearly is not the right man for the job. America needs a leader at the un who will not be a divisive figure that John clearly is. If he could not get along well with his colleagues at the state deparment how will he be expected to coax along countries that are anti-American. America needs to look for another alternative in exercising it's power that is not militaristic or does not ride roughshod over the interests of other countries

I doubt any Republican Senator will defy the President. He would be cutting his own throat if he did.