1
   

No Child Left Behind is actually working

 
 
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 07:43 am
Against the odds, success

In Norristown, fourth graders use video game-like calculators to help them whip through one-minute math problems.

In Collingswood, fourth graders pore over haiku to push their knowledge of words.

And at Philadelphia's Nebinger Elementary, a teacher made home visits to enlist parent support for weekend homework and extra assignments.

Over the last five years, schools throughout the Philadelphia region have experimented with an array of techniques aimed at getting students to score higher on state math and reading tests.

The lowest-performing schools, often serving poor children, face the most pressure to improve. Some of them have embraced new strategies that are showing success.

Prodded by the 2002 federal No Child Left Behind law, public districts throughout the region have transformed their programs to prepare students for the state tests. Next year, they face even higher benchmarks. The ultimate goal is for all children to perform at grade level by 2014.

In 2005 and 2006, 490 schools in Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania suburbs gave fifth-grade tests in the spring. Over that span, 49 showed improvement in reading of at least 10 percentage points; 57 showed improvement in math.

In New Jersey, 202 schools gave the tests; 23 showed improvements of 10 percentage points or higher in reading and 31 in math.

The Inquirer visited six of those schools to observe some of the techniques that educators say are showing results.


Using every minute

The fourth graders at Hancock Elementary School were ending the day after an intense math drill this month when Andrew Michener spontaneously broke into a chant of "I do believe."

Classmate Nadeera Hinton, a row in front of him, finished with, "I will succeed."

Spirits are high at Hancock, a neighborhood school in the economically depressed Montgomery County community, where 64 percent of students get free or reduced-price lunches. The children and staff are determined to prove that poverty cannot keep them from learning.

Two years ago, Hancock failed to meet federal standards, but it met them last year.

Reading scores for the fifth grade increased by 28 percentage points, to 55 percent proficient or above; in math, the gain was 27 percentage points, to 87 percent passing.

Schools with high poverty levels are more likely to be labeled as failing, state data show.

This year at the school, which now has kindergarten through fourth grade, many students believe they did well on the test, though scores won't come out for months. The math exams were simple, said Darius Hinton, a classmate and cousin of Nadeera's. When asked why, the 9-year-old said: "I've learned all the math strategies - I understand them, so I understood what is on the test."

There is reason to be confident, teachers and administrators say. Fourth graders now use statistical calculators several times a day to race through one-minute drills that teacher Sharon Kukulski turns into contests - half of the class against the other half, or the children trying to beat their previous scores. The calculators are individually programmed for the problems students need extra help on. "It's our answer to video games," Kukulski said. "It's a whole new way of teaching. We're high tech now."

Hancock also uses frequent testing and computerized data crunching to identify what students need help with. Several times a week, children with similar learning gaps are grouped together for short, special-instruction periods that the school calls focus groups. When they have mastered a skill, they go to another focus group to get help in another area.

"Urgency is a good way to describe us," said Betty Ann Young, a reading specialist at Hancock. "We use every minute we have." At lunch time, she said, aides carry math and vocabulary flash cards so that even there, students are learning.

School is much more academics-centered now than it was a few years ago, said Lisa Andrejko, Norristown Area School District superintendent. "You don't see, around Valentine's Day, two weeks to make a valentine," she said. "We might have a lesson around Valentine's Day, but it's going to be reading and writing, and the standards that are embedded in it."

Much the same transformation has taken place at Evans Elementary School in Yeadon, Delaware County. At the school, in the William Penn School District, 61 percent of students get free or reduced-price lunches. It, too, failed to meet the state test standard two years ago, then made it last year.

Fifth-grade scores improved to 53 percent proficient or above in reading, a 19-percentage-point jump; in math, 54 percent made the grade, a 20-percentage-point increase.

Superintendent Dana Bedden said the staff decided to do more for the students. "If you go to that school now, you'll find a sense from staff and students of 'We are going to show them how good we are.' "

To help instill self esteem, Evans principal Angela Ladson leads the children in a chant when she drops into a class: "The best students in the world are learning here at Evans."

They concentrate on how to make the hard work fun. Sixth graders, for example, recently created math board games, with questions and goals that they selected. Tiara Cannon's was named Fashion Math. Players advanced by answering math problems correctly. The goal is "to see who can get to the mall first," she said.

School "is both fun and work," said classmate Rumere Taylor, who said he enjoyed taking the state tests. Doing well "shows that you know things and shows other people what you know and that you've been working real hard for it," he said. "That's important."

More at link...
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 4,306 • Replies: 92
No top replies

 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 11:08 am
The silence is deafening!
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 11:45 am
Critics Say No Child Left Behind Report Misses Real Problems

Quote:
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 12:18 pm
I hate the No Child Left Behind act, and the stupid standardized tests that it is based on, from four different perspectives.

1. I taught science in a public high school.

As a teacher I resented these tests that took away the core of science; critical thinking skills and deep understanding, to the rote "knowledge" and mechanical processes that make students score better on tests. Education is best done by educators.

The amount of time that our school administrators wanted us to huddle around previous tests to tailor our students skills to match these limited shallow skills was maddening-- and teachers around the country now do this.

This certainly ensures students will have the surface "knowledge" and rote skills that these tests address. But it hurts the ability of students to develop deeper understanding or more abstract thinking skills.

2. I currently have a good job in software engineering and participate in hiring and evaluating new employees.

The deeper thinking skills that I noticed were being lost because of the dependence on shallow tests are the exact skills that are needed for people to be successful in today's good jobs.

Companies want to hire students who can do more than pass tests.

3. My previous job was working for a research organization designing an Algebra curriculum.

There is a lot of research in a basic problem in algebra education. The majority of students who pass Algebra in high school can do very well on the standard tests- as long as all of the problems are taken from a small number of set patterns.

Of course, the standardized test given stick to these types of questions. They only ask kids to solve questions that they have seen before. The kids memorize how to solve specific problems as a "turn the crank" process.

Students taught by rote don't learn how to think critically about algebra. They can't solve new types of problems and they can't apply logic very well.

Of course these critical thinking skills, not rote memorized procedures, are what mathematics are about.

Good jobs need critical thinking skills. The NCLB act hurts the effort to teach them.

4. As a parent with two high school aged kids, I am seeing these issues again. My kids are bringing home more worksheets than ever with rote problems. They aren't being taught the math behind them and they aren't being given the ability to think critically, or to use mathematics to solve new problems (that they haven't seen before).
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 12:41 pm
The testing measures what's easy to measure, not what needs to be measured.



You can easily test vocabulary, but it's harder to measure writing skills.

It's easy to test "solve for x" but it's harder to test for a student's ability to set up the problem in the first place.

It's easy to test if a student can read a paragraph; it's hard to test if they can apply the knowledge.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 12:53 pm
Quote:
The testing measures what's easy to measure, not what needs to be measured.


And such comments are also applicable to Exams such as the MCAT ( Medical college Admisions Test ). Does such a test really measure qualities of medical school applicants that make for good Doctors?

How does a standardized ( multiples choice ) test like the MCAT measure compassion and for that matter "commonsense", two qualities important to any modern mdeical practice in the US?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 12:55 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
I hate the No Child Left Behind act, and the stupid standardized tests that it is based on, from four different perspectives.

1. I taught science in a public high school.

As a teacher I resented these tests that took away the core of science; critical thinking skills and deep understanding, to the rote "knowledge" and mechanical processes that make students score better on tests. Education is best done by educators.

The amount of time that our school administrators wanted us to huddle around previous tests to tailor our students skills to match these limited shallow skills was maddening-- and teachers around the country now do this.

This certainly ensures students will have the surface "knowledge" and rote skills that these tests address. But it hurts the ability of students to develop deeper understanding or more abstract thinking skills.

2. I currently have a good job in software engineering and participate in hiring and evaluating new employees.

The deeper thinking skills that I noticed were being lost because of the dependence on shallow tests are the exact skills that are needed for people to be successful in today's good jobs.

Companies want to hire students who can do more than pass tests.

3. My previous job was working for a research organization designing an Algebra curriculum.

There is a lot of research in a basic problem in algebra education. The majority of students who pass Algebra in high school can do very well on the standard tests- as long as all of the problems are taken from a small number of set patterns.

Of course, the standardized test given stick to these types of questions. They only ask kids to solve questions that they have seen before. The kids memorize how to solve specific problems as a "turn the crank" process.

Students taught by rote don't learn how to think critically about algebra. They can't solve new types of problems and they can't apply logic very well.

Of course these critical thinking skills, not rote memorized procedures, are what mathematics are about.

Good jobs need critical thinking skills. The NCLB act hurts the effort to teach them.

4. As a parent with two high school aged kids, I am seeing these issues again. My kids are bringing home more worksheets than ever with rote problems. They aren't being taught the math behind them and they aren't being given the ability to think critically, or to use mathematics to solve new problems (that they haven't seen before).


Your post addresses 4 points which I will now rebut.

If teachers teach the core of science, critical thinking skills and deep understanding, students will pass the standardized tests very easily. The problem is, that is not happening. That is why No Student Left Behind (NSLB) was enacted. To ensure students are learning something and that schools are to be held accountable.

Deep thinking skills is not lost due to standardized testing. Success after school is dependent on the students ability to learn.

Learning algebra is all about knowing patterns. A2+b2=c2. With that, a student can figure out the hypotenuse of a triangle. Knowing how to solve the problem is what the standardized tests are for. To be sure every student meets minimum standards. If an algebra teacher does not teach students the formulas to solve algebra problems, the tests will show that and that teacher will and should be held accountable.

Rote problems teach the technique of problem solving. Do you honestly think that kids read it in a book and know it? No. If you solve similar problems repeatedly, you learn the process and learn the ability to solve for similar problems. If you want your children to think critically, teach them.
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 01:07 pm
The emphasis on testing is unfortunate, but if as a by product, NCLB has engendered this type of rededication and team work between educators and parents, and it's resulted in greater success for students, especially in basic skills such as reading and math in the lower elementary grades, I have trouble finding it all to be in vain.
This kind of stuff is exciting to me:
Quote:
In Collingswood, fourth graders pore over haiku to push their knowledge of words.

And at Philadelphia's Nebinger Elementary, a teacher made home visits to enlist parent support for weekend homework and extra assignments.

The lowest-performing schools, often serving poor children, face the most pressure to improve. Some of them have embraced new strategies that are showing success.



Quote:
Over the last five years, schools throughout the Philadelphia region have experimented with an array of techniques aimed at getting students to score higher on state math and reading tests.

This is the part that bothers me. It's sad that they still see the end goal as getting these kids to score higher on tests, instead of simply introducing methods that will work in all schools so that all children have the chance to succeed.


Quote:
Using every minute

The fourth graders at Hancock Elementary School were ending the day after an intense math drill this month when Andrew Michener spontaneously broke into a chant of "I do believe."

Classmate Nadeera Hinton, a row in front of him, finished with, "I will succeed."

Spirits are high at Hancock, a neighborhood school in the economically depressed Montgomery County community, where 64 percent of students get free or reduced-price lunches. The children and staff are determined to prove that poverty cannot keep them from learning.

Two years ago, Hancock failed to meet federal standards, but it met them last year.

But then again, why should we quibble with the whys and wherefores if these are the results?

And I think if these elementary aged students are getting stronger foundations in their basic skills, especially in mathematical operations and reading, at some point it will translate into a better understanding of abstract algebraic formulas and maybe that will morph into generalizing, problem solving and critical thinking.
They have to start somewhere...and an improvement in 10% of the schools targeted isn't bad-I have to admit I thought it would be a total wash. I'm encouraged.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 02:34 pm
I agree with what ebrown posted, but I am too sick right now to get into it.

Suffice to say that I am in the process of taking my curriculum courses to become an elementary school teacher. The professors are preaching that we need to find a way to balance curriculum content (= test knowledge) and all the other things desirable for a good education (critical thinking, problem solving, scientific method, etc).

The problem lies in the fact that there are just not enough hours in the school day to cover everything the way it needs to be covered.

McG - ever been a teacher?

Miller, I'd say that the standardized tests are only one way to judge a potential doctor (or lawyer, or 5th grader). It's one way and it's suited to only some people. We are taught to test kids by using multiple assessment tools. Anyone applying for med school will also have an application giving details about his or her history and something of their personality, right? I don't think many schools make their decisions about who to accept using the standard test scores alone.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 02:39 pm
littlek wrote:
McG - ever been a teacher?


Yes, I taught middle school science and high-school biology for 5 years.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 02:52 pm
McG, I'm just curious, are your kids school-aged yet?

Speaking from the parental perspective, these tests sap the joy out of the classroom. My son loves school, but ever since just after Christmas they've been hammering away in preparation for the test and I can tell you that he's losing interest. Thank goodness he has an excellent teacher who is doing her best to balance it, but I think it's sapping the joy of teaching from her as well.

It could be, however, that these tests do light fires under the asses of those who are educating our most vulnerable students -- those who need it most. And if that's the case I guess I can't ignore that. I just wish there was a better way.

I'm not an educator and would make a terrible teacher, so these are just my two cents.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 02:54 pm
No Child Left Behind may actually work, for all I know, although my casual observations tend to support ebrown's comments. But even if it's true that NCLB works, why should conservatives be applauding this news? After all, it's just one more federal program that interferes in an area that is of no concern to the federal government. Indeed, it wasn't so long ago that a fellow by the name of Ronald Reagan campaigned on a pledge to abolish the federal department of education (he never did it, but then that's no surprise). Now conservatives are patting themselves on the back when an intrusive federal program, supported by a bloated, useless Washington bureaucracy, actually does what it was designed to do? Conservatives these days must have so little to be proud of that they'll settle for boasting about something that they should be ashamed of.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 02:57 pm
McGentrix wrote:
littlek wrote:
McG - ever been a teacher?


Yes, I taught middle school science and high-school biology for 5 years.


Do you still?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 03:01 pm
One of the things about which i have heard educators complain so often is that the "No Child Left Behind" is that it constitutes an "unfunded obligation"--something about which conservatives have been howling for years. The administration requires adherence to the program, but hasn't provided the money it promised.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 03:03 pm
FreeDuck wrote:
McG, I'm just curious, are your kids school-aged yet?

Speaking from the parental perspective, these tests sap the joy out of the classroom. My son loves school, but ever since just after Christmas they've been hammering away in preparation for the test and I can tell you that he's losing interest. Thank goodness he has an excellent teacher who is doing her best to balance it, but I think it's sapping the joy of teaching from her as well.

It could be, however, that these tests do light fires under the asses of those who are educating our most vulnerable students -- those who need it most. And if that's the case I guess I can't ignore that. I just wish there was a better way.

I'm not an educator and would make a terrible teacher, so these are just my two cents.


My son took the third grade test a little while ago. It was extremely easy for him as he could read and do math. Skills he had because his teachers taught him and his parents supported and supplemented his education.

These tests are not difficult. They test basic skills. That some schools have low scores on these tests should be alarming. It means children are not gaining basic skills they need. If teaching to the test means children learn the basic skills, then at least that much is getting accomplished.

Littlek - No. I could no longer tolerate parental non-involvement in their children's lives. I did not want to be a babysitter any longer.

joe, quit being an instigator. Our children are beyond petty political bickering. This is just another Bush program that has been successful despite the left.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 03:06 pm
McGentrix wrote:

These tests are not difficult. They test basic skills. That some schools have low scores on these tests should be alarming. It means children are not gaining basic skills they need. If teaching to the test means children learn the basic skills, then at least that much is getting accomplished.


No, they are not difficult. Which is why repetitive and extensive preparation for them is boring and uninspiring -- especially for a 1st grader who would rather learn something new.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 03:09 pm
joefromchicago wrote:
But even if it's true that NCLB works, why should conservatives be applauding this news?

They shouldn't. In fact this libertarian, whom you may or may not categorize as a conservative, is deeply frustrated by very the existence of this act.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 03:10 pm
They aren't difficult at all. That's not the point.

The point is that they are tied to funding now, to a degree where school districts are downright terrified to not make their numbers. And there are a large variety of reasons why they might not, depending on how different segments of their schools score.

So much so that the test is all that matters; losing funding means the whole school gets re-org'ed. It's skewed what learning means for many children.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 03:24 pm
McGentrix wrote:
joe, quit being an instigator. Our children are beyond petty political bickering. This is just another Bush program that has been successful despite the left.

I have little hope for you, McG, but I hope everyone else enjoyed the irony of your response as much as I did.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 03:26 pm
Thomas wrote:
joefromchicago wrote:
But even if it's true that NCLB works, why should conservatives be applauding this news?

They shouldn't. In fact this libertarian, whom you may or may not categorize as a conservative, is deeply frustrated by very the existence of this act.

Ah, Thomas, you're that rarest of all creatures, a natural rights utilitarian. You are beyond political labels.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » No Child Left Behind is actually working
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 10:45:59