Lash wrote:GW-- You don't give him credit for cleaning up Dinkin's mess?
What problems did he create?
<GreenWitch's answer>
A lot of this is opinion.
Thats what you asked for. She said she didnt think he did a good job, you asked her why she thought so. So she told you.
I cant remember you ever restraining yourself from expressing an opinion if you didnt have links to footnote every claim - even when you
werent asked for it ;-)
Lash wrote:Rudy .. loves plugging in his cronies to positions where they're not always best suited. He recommended his former bodyguard Bernie Kerik (yeah I had to look up the name) to Bush for his Homeland Security Chief and the hearings were almost comical when Kerik's dark past (including ties to organized crime) came to the surface.
Reminds me of Obama's cozy relationship with Daley...
What Soz said. Giuliani personally
appointed Kerik to New York City Police Commissioner.
Not just did Giuliani take the responsibility for this appointment as regular part of his job - he went out of his way to push through his appointment, despite the fact that Kerik lacked the prescribed qualifications. As
Wikipedia points out, having a college degree was a requirement established in 1985 by then-Commissioner Benjamin Ward for anyone promoted above the rank of
Captain, and yet Giuliani made Kerik police chief of the city even though he didnt have any.
Moreover, Wikipedia also adds, "There have been questions raised regarding the fact that the City of New York's Department of Investigations bypassed the normal vetting process in appointing Kerik police commissioner. The accusation among others were that his chief qualification appeared to be that he had served as Giuliani's driver and bodyguard."
So not just did he personally appoint the guy to be the city's police chief - it was a very controversial appointment at that. All of this equates with endorsing your party's candidate for mayor how exactly?
Lash wrote:Kerik is a pea compared to them...and the big difference there--Rudy was unaware.
Dont you think a New York mayor should have made the effort to find out about someone's past ties to organised crime, before bypassing regulations and vetting process to appoint him to head of police of New York City? Let alone recommending him as
US Homeland Security Chief?
Lash wrote:I suggest reading America's Mayor: The Hidden History of Rudy Giuliani's New York - Robert Polner. I think it's an honest assessment of the Giuliani years and makes for a good telling of history.
Sounds like a tabloid. I thought liberals were above that...
Hardly a tabloid.
"Edited by Robert Polner, who covered city hall for Newsday during much of Giuliani's administration,
America's Mayor collects the original essays and reporting of some of New York's best writers, including Pulitzer Prize winner Jim Dwyer, Tom Robbins, Jimmy Breslin, Kevin Baker, Luc Sante, LynNell Hancock, and others."
As you could have found out through a
simple Google search
What is with this "Oh you're giving me information that could be unbenefitial to my preferred candidate, I'd better just reject it out of hand as something it isnt, rather than have to actually Google it up and find out I might have to take it seriously"? Its, like, positively Foxfyre-esque.