Bush Supporters' Aftermath Thread IV

They just can't seem to get Clinton out of their brains to compare him to all the problems created by Bush.

cicerone imposter wrote:

They just can't seem to get Clinton out of their brains to compare him to all the problems created by Bush.

It is a big handicap, I think, to be of a mindset which is purely black/white, yin/yang, Rep/Dem, Clinton/Bush.

McTag wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

They just can't seem to get Clinton out of their brains to compare him to all the problems created by Bush.

It is a big handicap, I think, to be of a mindset which is purely black/white, yin/yang, Rep/Dem, Clinton/Bush.

pot/kettle

They just can't seem to get Clinton out of their brains to compare him to all the problems created by Bush.

cicerone imposter wrote:

They just can't seem to get Clinton out of their brains to compare him to all the problems created by Bush.

Does this mean that after the next President is sworn in,you will never mention Bush again?

After all,he wont be the President and therefore will not be responsible for anything that happens after he leaves office,even if its a result of actions he takes now?

It is silly to constantly dump on Clinton. He lied about a bj by a consenting adult in his home. This is something any married man, who has a child, would do. Big deal!

What was really criminal was the Republicans spending years persecuting Clinton (while not doing the government's business) at tremendous taxpayer expense.

Advocate wrote:

It is silly to constantly dump on Clinton. He lied about a bj by a consenting adult in his home. This is something any married man, who has a child, would do. Big deal!

What was really criminal was the Republicans spending years persecuting Clinton (while not doing the government's business) at tremendous taxpayer expense.

Actually,an HONORABLE man,if he is married,wouldnt have gotten a bj by someone other then his wife in the first place.
So he would have no reason to lie about it.

The difference is the word HONORABLE.

Are you now defending a man that admittedly cheated on his wife?

mysteryman wrote:

Advocate wrote:

It is silly to constantly dump on Clinton. He lied about a bj by a consenting adult in his home. This is something any married man, who has a child, would do. Big deal!

What was really criminal was the Republicans spending years persecuting Clinton (while not doing the government's business) at tremendous taxpayer expense.

Actually,an HONORABLE man,if he is married,wouldnt have gotten a bj by someone other then his wife in the first place.
So he would have no reason to lie about it.

The difference is the word HONORABLE.

Are you now defending a man that admittedly cheated on his wife?

Good question - where are you on, say, Guiliani or Gingrich?

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

Advocate wrote:

It is silly to constantly dump on Clinton. He lied about a bj by a consenting adult in his home. This is something any married man, who has a child, would do. Big deal!

What was really criminal was the Republicans spending years persecuting Clinton (while not doing the government's business) at tremendous taxpayer expense.

Actually,an HONORABLE man,if he is married,wouldnt have gotten a bj by someone other then his wife in the first place.
So he would have no reason to lie about it.

The difference is the word HONORABLE.

Are you now defending a man that admittedly cheated on his wife?

Good question - where are you on, say, Guiliani or Gingrich?

Cycloptichorn

I dont like either one of them.

mysteryman wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

Advocate wrote:

It is silly to constantly dump on Clinton. He lied about a bj by a consenting adult in his home. This is something any married man, who has a child, would do. Big deal!

What was really criminal was the Republicans spending years persecuting Clinton (while not doing the government's business) at tremendous taxpayer expense.

Actually,an HONORABLE man,if he is married,wouldnt have gotten a bj by someone other then his wife in the first place.
So he would have no reason to lie about it.

The difference is the word HONORABLE.

Are you now defending a man that admittedly cheated on his wife?

Good question - where are you on, say, Guiliani or Gingrich?

Cycloptichorn

I dont like either one of them.

I applaud your consistency!

I agree with you that cheating is something no honorable man would do.

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

Advocate wrote:

It is silly to constantly dump on Clinton. He lied about a bj by a consenting adult in his home. This is something any married man, who has a child, would do. Big deal!

What was really criminal was the Republicans spending years persecuting Clinton (while not doing the government's business) at tremendous taxpayer expense.

Actually,an HONORABLE man,if he is married,wouldnt have gotten a bj by someone other then his wife in the first place.
So he would have no reason to lie about it.

The difference is the word HONORABLE.

Are you now defending a man that admittedly cheated on his wife?

Good question - where are you on, say, Guiliani or Gingrich?

Cycloptichorn

I dont like either one of them.

I applaud your consistency!

I agree with you that cheating is something no honorable man would do.

Cycloptichorn

IMO,ANY man that cheats on his wife (or woman that cheats on her husband) has no honor and is not to be trusted any further then you can throw them.

If someone will break that most sacred promise,then there is every reason to believe they will break every other promise they can make.

If someone will break that most sacred promise,then there is every reason to believe they will break every other promise they can make.