0
   

Something Wicked This Way Comes!

 
 
H2O MAN
 
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 08:02 am
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton Announces White House Bid.

Can the White House withstand the return of HillBilly?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 2,703 • Replies: 61
No top replies

 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 08:48 am
A nation that can survive Bush can survive anything.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 09:12 am
Did pretty nicely the first time round.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 09:24 am
I think Hillary will make a very, very stong candidate...and I rather suspect she would make a great president.

In any case...damn near anybody will be an improvement over the current failure.
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 09:25 am
ehBeth wrote:
Did pretty nicely the first time round.
A Statewide vote means diddlysquat. Getting an entire nation behind her is going to take a hell of a lot more than a screwy smile and snippy snide remarks about everyone from a to z. Even many of those who voted for her as a U.S. Senator have expressed concerns over the idea of her becoming President. Translate that over to the national level and she has a lot of work to do, a lot of smoothing over (of herself and of those she has stomped on) to tend to.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 09:26 am
I plan on voting for her.
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  0  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 09:34 am
I plan on voting for just about anyone other than the two faced liar.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 09:36 am
which two-face liar?
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  0  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 09:40 am
littlek wrote:
which two-face liar?
In this case Hillary.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 09:44 am
You are not likely to find a politician that has told the truth 100% of the time. I can't think of any at all. Bush dwarfs them all for hypocracy.
0 Replies
 
blacksmithn
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 09:57 am
I'm not thrilled with the idea of Hilary as the Democratic nominee, but I'll vote for her over that tool McCain.
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 10:03 am
edgarblythe wrote:
You are not likely to find a politician that has told the truth 100% of the time. I can't think of any at all. Bush dwarfs them all for hypocracy.

However, the majority of people who criticize George also say he is an idiot so he cannot actually be responsible for the things he has said...he's clearly not bright enough according to the masses. Hillary on the other hand is said to be intelligent and shrewd. Keep in mind, shrewd is somewhat synonymous with evil and untruths.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 10:03 am
Sturgis wrote:
ehBeth wrote:
Did pretty nicely the first time round.
A Statewide vote means diddlysquat.


I was talking about The White House.
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 10:08 am
ehBeth wrote:
Sturgis wrote:
ehBeth wrote:
Did pretty nicely the first time round.
A Statewide vote means diddlysquat.


I was talking about The White House.
Hillary never ran for President and being on the shirttails of Bilgeman does not mean she is qualified. Try to remember if you will the fiasco she made of a national health care plan, and still the morons of the world claim her to be a saint. I suppose her self imposed and self-sought after martyrdom over the years should be the only qualification needed Rolling Eyes at least that's how the average lilly livered liberal views it.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 10:08 am
Any of the Democrats who are running is better than any of the Republicans. That being said, I would prefer it not be Hillary.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 10:09 am
Sturgis wrote:
ehBeth wrote:
Sturgis wrote:
ehBeth wrote:
Did pretty nicely the first time round.
A Statewide vote means diddlysquat.


I was talking about The White House.
Hillary never ran for President


I guess you didn't read the opening post.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 10:11 am
Anybody who defends Bush's lack of honesty can't really be serious about criticising Hillary.
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 10:17 am
ehBeth wrote:
Sturgis wrote:
ehBeth wrote:
Sturgis wrote:
ehBeth wrote:
Did pretty nicely the first time round.
A Statewide vote means diddlysquat.


I was talking about The White House.
Hillary never ran for President


I guess you didn't read the opening post.

I did; however, the main focus here is the blatant and blind support of Hillary and how dangerous it is.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 11:41 am
i hope you are not taking any cues from canadian voters , who last year threw out the liberal government and voted in the conservatives (who , prior to the last election , were still known as 'progressive' conservatives ).

while the liberals were careless with some money spent trying to buy quebec votes , they also :
- brought the deficit and national debt under control - which had been increasing at an alarming rate under the conservatives ,
- helped increase the canadian dollar which had taken a slide under the conservatives (it had come up from about 60 cents u.s. to about 90 cents u.s. ) .

now people are beginning to regret their choice by saying : " ... yes , but we had to throw the rascals out ... " .
of course , they could have voted for the third party , NDP (new democratic party ) who has had a good track record in forming provincial governments in the western (farm) provinces .
people must have been afraid that they would be forced to wear red underwear (as the new democratic party it described by some old line conservatives . to tell the truth , they are a pretty mild version of a socialist party - having a balanced budget and universal medical care are probably their trademarks) .

so here we are with a "conservative" government - sure hope they can keep the deficit and debt under control and don't let the canadian dollar slide AGAIN .
hbg
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 12:07 pm
As a Democrat I would not vote for Hillary Clinton. As STurgis said,
her national health plan fell by the wayside and created a fiasco.
She gives great lip service and does not deliver.

With her as Democratic candidat, the Republicans would win the next election.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Something Wicked This Way Comes!
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/27/2021 at 12:57:20