65
   

IT'S TIME FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE

 
 
USAFHokie80
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:22 pm
Miller wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Gee Miller, I guess that whole lifetime of work in the Medical industry has left you without any knowledge of how things actually work, according to Hokie. If only we all had realized long ago that Medicaid and Medicare were the reasons our costs as a nation went up, on average, 20% or so a year for the last 5 or 6 years.

Cycloptichorn


Where would this nation be, if we didn't have Medicare and Medicaid to help seniors and the poverty-stricken?

Do we really want 90 year old seniors dying from starvation in the streets of our major cities?


Since when does medicare and medicaid pay for food?
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:23 pm
Quote:
...what is required to keep the industry going. ...


that's calling it what it is : an industry !
no different than general motors , general mills or any other big corporation .

in the CAR INDUSTRY , if GM refuses to sell you a car , you can always go to ford or honda and buy a similar product at a similar price .

i understand that's not how it works in the HEALTH INDUSTRY , if any one supplier refuses you coverage , the other SUPPLIERS will likely also refuse you coverage - isn't that how it works ?
or will there be a supplier who'll happily sell you the product you are looking for ?(see under : CAR INDUSTRY)
hbg
0 Replies
 
USAFHokie80
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:23 pm
Miller wrote:
And as far as the nonsense posted in this forum on "formularies", anyone with medical experience knows, that hospitals have formulary committees that meet on a regular basis and have the right and obligation to change formularies at any time, without consultation with an insurance company.


It's hardly nonsense. The hospital can do whatever they want. But the insurance company will only pay for what is approved on THEIR formulary, regardless of what the hospital wants to administer.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:24 pm
USAFHokie80 wrote:
Miller wrote:
And as far as the nonsense posted in this forum on "formularies", anyone with medical experience knows, that hospitals have formulary committees that meet on a regular basis and have the right and obligation to change formularies at any time, without consultation with an insurance company.


It's hardly nonsense. The hospital can do whatever they want. But the insurance company will only pay for what is approved on THEIR formulary, regardless of what the hospital wants to administer.


And the patient, privy to practically none of this information, is just expected to grin and bear it?

Jeez, you don't see a problem with this scenario?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
USAFHokie80
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:24 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
USAFHokie80 wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Gee Miller, I guess that whole lifetime of work in the Medical industry has left you without any knowledge of how things actually work, according to Hokie. If only we all had realized long ago that Medicaid and Medicare were the reasons our costs as a nation went up, on average, 20% or so a year for the last 5 or 6 years.

Cycloptichorn


Obviously medicare and medicaid aren't the only reason, but they are a driving one.

And for the record, I am in the medical industry myself. As well as my boyfriend and the majority of our friends. So I have a pretty good idea of how this all works. It would serve you well to do some research beyond googleing for the 0.0000385 seconds or however long it took.


I have been. Perhaps you could point out the evidence that would support your position and counteract mine; I apparently am in desperate need of it, and you appear to be in the exact position to offer it. I await eagerly.

Cycloptichorn


Maybe you should ask a physician about productivity and RVU thresholds. Ask about formularies and how billing is done.

Which by the way, you didn't answer. Since you told me I was wrong, I'd like you to tell me how hospitals produce a bill.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:26 pm
USAFHokie80 wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
USAFHokie80 wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Gee Miller, I guess that whole lifetime of work in the Medical industry has left you without any knowledge of how things actually work, according to Hokie. If only we all had realized long ago that Medicaid and Medicare were the reasons our costs as a nation went up, on average, 20% or so a year for the last 5 or 6 years.

Cycloptichorn


Obviously medicare and medicaid aren't the only reason, but they are a driving one.

And for the record, I am in the medical industry myself. As well as my boyfriend and the majority of our friends. So I have a pretty good idea of how this all works. It would serve you well to do some research beyond googleing for the 0.0000385 seconds or however long it took.


I have been. Perhaps you could point out the evidence that would support your position and counteract mine; I apparently am in desperate need of it, and you appear to be in the exact position to offer it. I await eagerly.

Cycloptichorn


Maybe you should ask a physician about productivity and RVU thresholds. Ask about formularies and how billing is done.

Which by the way, you didn't answer. Since you told me I was wrong, I'd like you to tell me how hospitals produce a bill.


I did tell you. They bill for each and every item and procedure and unit of service they think they can get away with making the patient or the insurance pay. I have no doubt that some hospitals are more scrupulous than others, but basically that's how it works.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
USAFHokie80
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:26 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
USAFHokie80 wrote:
Miller wrote:
And as far as the nonsense posted in this forum on "formularies", anyone with medical experience knows, that hospitals have formulary committees that meet on a regular basis and have the right and obligation to change formularies at any time, without consultation with an insurance company.


It's hardly nonsense. The hospital can do whatever they want. But the insurance company will only pay for what is approved on THEIR formulary, regardless of what the hospital wants to administer.


And the patient, privy to practically none of this information, is just expected to grin and bear it?

Jeez, you don't see a problem with this scenario?

Cycloptichorn


The patient can ask the insurance company for a copy. More than likely, it's included in the "welcome packet" when you first buy a policy. More than likely, no one ever reads it.
0 Replies
 
USAFHokie80
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:27 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
USAFHokie80 wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
USAFHokie80 wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Gee Miller, I guess that whole lifetime of work in the Medical industry has left you without any knowledge of how things actually work, according to Hokie. If only we all had realized long ago that Medicaid and Medicare were the reasons our costs as a nation went up, on average, 20% or so a year for the last 5 or 6 years.

Cycloptichorn


Obviously medicare and medicaid aren't the only reason, but they are a driving one.

And for the record, I am in the medical industry myself. As well as my boyfriend and the majority of our friends. So I have a pretty good idea of how this all works. It would serve you well to do some research beyond googleing for the 0.0000385 seconds or however long it took.


I have been. Perhaps you could point out the evidence that would support your position and counteract mine; I apparently am in desperate need of it, and you appear to be in the exact position to offer it. I await eagerly.

Cycloptichorn


Maybe you should ask a physician about productivity and RVU thresholds. Ask about formularies and how billing is done.

Which by the way, you didn't answer. Since you told me I was wrong, I'd like you to tell me how hospitals produce a bill.


I did tell you. They bill for each and every item and procedure and unit of service they think they can get away with making the patient or the insurance pay. I have no doubt that some hospitals are more scrupulous than others, but basically that's how it works.

Cycloptichorn


So you think they just add extraneous things to a bill, that aren't on the patient's chart ?
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:29 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
See Miller's response above, Hokie.

The insurance company shouldn't get to pick and choose which medicines the doctor prescribes for the patient. My parents have/had no way of knowing which ones would be covered and which ones' wouldn't; you think they sat there in the post-op room and called the insurance company just to make sure?

I think that the hospitals and insurance companies both bill for each and every piece of work they think they can actually get away with - whether it is legitimate or not. They have every incentive to do so and no incentive not to do so; in the end, they both see a net gain in profits by doing so, and if someone calls them on it (like we did) then they just charge for what actually happened. There's literally no downside to the practice.

I know exactly how the health care insurance industry works - they use the money you give them, every month, as an investment. When they get lower returns on the investment, rates go up. This is the cause of the precipitous rate rises you've seen over the last several years; during the late 90's, when everyone was making money hand over fist, the various health insurance companies of America did quite poorly in their investments. As many of them are publicly traded, they have to keep showing returns... ergo, costs go up.

It's not complicated to figure out the swindle, unless you aren't trying.

Cycloptichorn


Is it really a swindle? If the Insurance company cannot pay its claims or other bills, it will file for bankrupcy and everyone will loose. If you buy insurance you are, in effect, buying the average cost and service provided by the program.

Claims management is indeed a vital function for the insurer, as both the prescribing physician and the patient are now immune from the market (i.e. cost) forces that would otherwise limit their choices. This means rationing, limits on payments for specific services, official formularies independent of those preferred by the physician (and patient) and other limits on expensive services covered - as well as the usual chicken shitt in claims management designed expressedly to discourage claims and delay payment.

In theory insurance companies that seriously mistreat their customers will eventually lose them and their source of income. However, if we adopt a government mandated insurance program we will have increased their power in a restricted monopoly. Hardly an improvement to the situation you describe.

There is no free lunch. Free markets work better.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:30 pm
USAFHokie80 wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
USAFHokie80 wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
USAFHokie80 wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Gee Miller, I guess that whole lifetime of work in the Medical industry has left you without any knowledge of how things actually work, according to Hokie. If only we all had realized long ago that Medicaid and Medicare were the reasons our costs as a nation went up, on average, 20% or so a year for the last 5 or 6 years.

Cycloptichorn


Obviously medicare and medicaid aren't the only reason, but they are a driving one.

And for the record, I am in the medical industry myself. As well as my boyfriend and the majority of our friends. So I have a pretty good idea of how this all works. It would serve you well to do some research beyond googleing for the 0.0000385 seconds or however long it took.


I have been. Perhaps you could point out the evidence that would support your position and counteract mine; I apparently am in desperate need of it, and you appear to be in the exact position to offer it. I await eagerly.

Cycloptichorn


Maybe you should ask a physician about productivity and RVU thresholds. Ask about formularies and how billing is done.

Which by the way, you didn't answer. Since you told me I was wrong, I'd like you to tell me how hospitals produce a bill.


I did tell you. They bill for each and every item and procedure and unit of service they think they can get away with making the patient or the insurance pay. I have no doubt that some hospitals are more scrupulous than others, but basically that's how it works.

Cycloptichorn


So you think they just add extraneous things to a bill, that aren't on the patient's chart ?


I don't just think, I know for a fact that this is commonly and regularly done. I have a lifetime of watching my family and friends deal with it. And it makes logical sense for the hospitals to do so - tell me, what is the downside of them doing so?

I understand that as an employee of the industry you have a vested interest in protecting and projecting an image of fairness, but deep down, I think you know that there's a lot of truth in what I'm saying.

The patient's chart is a starting point, not an end point, for determining the amount which will be billed. Start with what was actually done, and go from there.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
USAFHokie80
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:32 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
USAFHokie80 wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
USAFHokie80 wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
USAFHokie80 wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Gee Miller, I guess that whole lifetime of work in the Medical industry has left you without any knowledge of how things actually work, according to Hokie. If only we all had realized long ago that Medicaid and Medicare were the reasons our costs as a nation went up, on average, 20% or so a year for the last 5 or 6 years.

Cycloptichorn


Obviously medicare and medicaid aren't the only reason, but they are a driving one.

And for the record, I am in the medical industry myself. As well as my boyfriend and the majority of our friends. So I have a pretty good idea of how this all works. It would serve you well to do some research beyond googleing for the 0.0000385 seconds or however long it took.


I have been. Perhaps you could point out the evidence that would support your position and counteract mine; I apparently am in desperate need of it, and you appear to be in the exact position to offer it. I await eagerly.

Cycloptichorn


Maybe you should ask a physician about productivity and RVU thresholds. Ask about formularies and how billing is done.

Which by the way, you didn't answer. Since you told me I was wrong, I'd like you to tell me how hospitals produce a bill.


I did tell you. They bill for each and every item and procedure and unit of service they think they can get away with making the patient or the insurance pay. I have no doubt that some hospitals are more scrupulous than others, but basically that's how it works.

Cycloptichorn


So you think they just add extraneous things to a bill, that aren't on the patient's chart ?


I don't just think, I know for a fact that this is commonly and regularly done. I have a lifetime of watching my family and friends deal with it. And it makes logical sense for the hospitals to do so - tell me, what is the downside of them doing so?

I understand that as an employee of the industry you have a vested interest in protecting and projecting an image of fairness, but deep down, I think you know that there's a lot of truth in what I'm saying.

The patient's chart is a starting point, not an end point, for determining the amount which will be billed. Start with what was actually done, and go from there.

Cycloptichorn


You are wrong. The downside... well, it's a fellony first of al. And I do not work FOR the industry. So I have no interest in making them "look" better. Bills are generated by ICD-9, LYNX, and SNOMED codes as well as I&O and med profiles. ALL of which are on the patient chart.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:35 pm
Snort... you're living in a fantasy world if you think that proper accounting practices are followed, just b/c not following them is a felony.

You can always explain it away as a clerical error. Always. And how much does it cost to hire lawyers, investigate, and find out about these problems? And who foots the bill for this?

I'm sorry if I simply don't believe that my father's medical chart 'accidentally' got so many things added on to it, that had little or nothing to do with him. I guess all those other people who have experienced the same problem are victims of the tragically high accident rate amongst medical charts Laughing

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
USAFHokie80
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:35 pm
By the way, the insurance companies and hospitals and the way billing is done is HEAVILY regulated by the government through various agencies... So if you're complaining about all these things now, what do you think will happen when the gov't takes full control?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:38 pm
USAFHokie80 wrote:
By the way, the insurance companies and hospitals and the way billing is done is HEAVILY regulated by the government through various agencies... So if you're complaining about all these things now, what do you think will happen when the gov't takes full control?


Yeah, because there are problems with an idea, why, we should just scrap the whole thing. Dang.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:39 pm
USAFHokie80 wrote:
By the way, the insurance companies and hospitals and the way billing is done is HEAVILY regulated by the government through various agencies... So if you're complaining about all these things now, what do you think will happen when the govt takes full control?



Show us which government regulations regulate hospital billings?
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:39 pm
USAFHokie80 wrote:
So you think they just add extraneous things to a bill, that aren't on the patient's chart ?


I see evidence of it each and every day when I review U.S. hospital invoices. When we prepare the requests to OHIP for reimbursement, claimants often tell us they didn't receive the service they were billed for. Sometimes it's frighteningly obvious - when it's treatment for an uninvolved area of the body.

There's a reason some insurers in the U.S. hire specialized billing review services. You can almost always cut 20+% off a carefully reviewed invoice submitted by a U.S. hospital. Some of the billing review services have agreements with hospitals where upper limits to specific treatments/supplies/services have been set. It's worth the 2 - 3% review payment to those agencies for any U.S. hospital treatment that involves more than an emergency room visit (and sometimes those are worth investigating as well).
0 Replies
 
USAFHokie80
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:39 pm
You said that your father's stuff was 10 years ago... That was well before the proliferation of computers into most medical facilities. Clerical errors were common.

See, this is my point... You'll criticize a system, having NO idea how it actually works or some of the actual problems in it... but then when someone tells you about them you refuse to believe them.

You're not interested in the truth. You're interested in blaming someone else.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:42 pm
USAFHokie80 wrote:
You said that your father's stuff was 10 years ago... That was well before the proliferation of computers into most medical facilities. Clerical errors were common.

See, this is my point... You'll criticize a system, having NO idea how it actually works or some of the actual problems in it... but then when someone tells you about them you refuse to believe them.


I'm pretty sure they had computers in MD Anderson hospital in 1998. I think you are sort of grasping at straws at this point.

How many clerical errors occur, where payments are left off for services rendered? I bet, extremely close to zero.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:42 pm
No, you're wrong. All we want is "evidence." You do know what "evidence" is don't you? Where's the regs? Name them; some or all.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Sep, 2007 05:43 pm
maporsche wrote:

So, say my doctor says that I need a surgery and I get it. My insurance company then decides not to pay for it and I'm stuck with a 50,000 bill. What you're saying that I should do to solve this problem is find another insurance company who doesn't screw over their customers......but what do I do about this $50,000 bill? Hire a $10,000 lawyer to go up against the $500,000 lawyers that the insurance company has? Spend 10 years in court after losing my house, car, etc?

You have several options. (1) You could elect to forego the surgery, and opt for another treatment the insurer will cover. (2) You could pay the $50,000.

You would be in precisely the same situation if we had a government managed "universal" system and the operation in question wasn't covered by that.

$50,000 is the price of 1 1/2 Honda Accords (including taxes); or an Infinity M; or one year's tuition at a major University. If my health was at stake I would value it over these alternatives.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/17/2025 at 01:21:54