Cycloptichorn wrote:See Miller's response above, Hokie.
The insurance company shouldn't get to pick and choose which medicines the doctor prescribes for the patient. My parents have/had no way of knowing which ones would be covered and which ones' wouldn't; you think they sat there in the post-op room and called the insurance company just to make sure?
I think that the hospitals and insurance companies both bill for each and every piece of work they think they can actually get away with - whether it is legitimate or not. They have every incentive to do so and no incentive not to do so; in the end, they both see a net gain in profits by doing so, and if someone calls them on it (like we did) then they just charge for what actually happened. There's literally no downside to the practice.
I know exactly how the health care insurance industry works - they use the money you give them, every month, as an investment. When they get lower returns on the investment, rates go up. This is the cause of the precipitous rate rises you've seen over the last several years; during the late 90's, when everyone was making money hand over fist, the various health insurance companies of America did quite poorly in their investments. As many of them are publicly traded, they have to keep showing returns... ergo, costs go up.
It's not complicated to figure out the swindle, unless you aren't trying.
Cycloptichorn
Is it really a swindle? If the Insurance company cannot pay its claims or other bills, it will file for bankrupcy and everyone will loose. If you buy insurance you are, in effect, buying the average cost and service provided by the program.
Claims management is indeed a vital function for the insurer, as both the prescribing physician and the patient are now immune from the market (i.e. cost) forces that would otherwise limit their choices. This means rationing, limits on payments for specific services, official formularies independent of those preferred by the physician (and patient) and other limits on expensive services covered - as well as the usual chicken shitt in claims management designed expressedly to discourage claims and delay payment.
In theory insurance companies that seriously mistreat their customers will eventually lose them and their source of income. However, if we adopt a government mandated insurance program we will have increased their power in a restricted monopoly. Hardly an improvement to the situation you describe.
There is no free lunch. Free markets work better.