miller wrote :
Quote:We have Universal Health Care in Massachusetts, and one consequence is physicians are refusing to take on any more patients. They're booked to capacity so some folks have to run around trying to find an MD . They'll probably end up getting a new physician, fresh out of a residency and eager...
let me see if i understand this .
...physicians are booked to capacity... (after univ health care - right ?)
i can assume the physicians were NOT booked to capacity BEFORE univ health care - right ?
so i'm wondering were those new patients looking for a physician are coming from that now cause the overbooking ?
could some of them possibly be citizens that formerly could not afford health care because they either could not get insurance or did not have enough cash in their pockets ?
is it best to leave those patients who previously did NOT have health care out of the system - leave them without or marginal health-care or is it better for ALL citizens to have proper health care ?
imo providing proper healthcare for ALL citizens results in a healthier society and the many benefits resulting from that .
perhaps some might say that is is a good idea to leave some citizens WITHOUT proper health-care - personally i don't see any benefits in it , but i would be interested in the arguments for leaving some citizens WITHOUT proper health-care .
any takers ?
hbg