@okie,
okie wrote:
Good grief, are you blind? He has taken over GM and Chrysler
Who were failing and going under, at a time when we couldn't afford to have major industries go out of business. I would also remind you that the initial billions of dollars given to these companies came from Bush, not Obama.
Quote:wedged in alot more influence into the banks,
Bullshit. You don't know the first thing about what you are talking about. Once again, these banks were
failing and would have failed without a government bailout. All of them. It would have been a Depression. And once again, it was Bush who authorized the funds used to bail these banks out.
Quote:
and is now attempting to take over a large percentage of business in this country, otherwise known as the health care industry.
Nothing Obama is doing constitutes a 'take-over' of the health care industry. Nothing. You are merely being hyperbolic here. Nobody is proposing a Socialized health care system, or even a single-payer system; the plan they are proposing is eminently Capitalistic, going to GREAT LENGTHS to preserve the Healthcare market and the drug market. You don't seem to understand that a Radical would be proposing a system much, much different than Obama's.
Quote:
Cap and trade, thats obviously another ploy of his to try to hold sway over the energy industry in this country.
Or, to combat the climate change and pollution problems we experience. Yaknow, that big problem that affects us all, no matter whether we use a companies' products or not.
Quote:Are you blind, cyclops, or just have selective sight and hearing to suit your own preferences. I know you are also very biased and like aspects of communism, but try to be honest about your beliefs, okay, own up to them and admit to what you know Obama is trying to do. Anybody that has any common sense and stands for personal liberty and capitalism and free enterprise, they would never support Obama, no way. You are either dishonest or naive, one or the other.
I'm neither dishonest nor naive; just better educated than you on pretty much every issue under discussion, and less paranoid. You have no real understanding of what a 'radical' would be doing, you just assign that word to policies which are no further to the Left than Republican policies have been to the Right over the last few decades.
Cycloptichorn
