65
   

IT'S TIME FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE

 
 
USAFHokie80
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2008 01:50 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
To the best evidence presented here, neither of us works in health care. See, these are the interwebs, and people can tell the truth or lie all they want.

It's entirely likely that under Obama there will be some form of Universal Health care, our system will adjust, and everything will chug along perfectly fine. I find your Cassandra-ish prognostications of doom to be specious at best; we'll find a way to work things out. And one which addresses all Americans, not just those who happen to be either already healthy or rather well off.

Cycloptichorn


Eh... well you don't have to believe that I am in the field; but your belief notwithstanding, I am. And many of the things I've mentioned here have come from the mouths of physicians. Which, of course, you probably don't beleive either.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2008 01:51 pm
hbg, Don't cancel; my nephew is a physician at Queens Hospital in Honolulu, and he volunteers as often as he can in Cambodia - teaching and practicing intensive care. It doesn't matter that some people might label him a socialist, but that he volunteers his skills and time tells me he's a great doctor.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2008 01:53 pm
USAFHokie80 wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
To the best evidence presented here, neither of us works in health care. See, these are the interwebs, and people can tell the truth or lie all they want.

It's entirely likely that under Obama there will be some form of Universal Health care, our system will adjust, and everything will chug along perfectly fine. I find your Cassandra-ish prognostications of doom to be specious at best; we'll find a way to work things out. And one which addresses all Americans, not just those who happen to be either already healthy or rather well off.

Cycloptichorn


Eh... well you don't have to believe that I am in the field; but your belief notwithstanding, I am. And many of the things I've mentioned here have come from the mouths of physicians. Which, of course, you probably don't beleive either.


What, highly paid people claiming that they will leave the country if their highly paid jobs are threatened in any way?

Oh noez! We'd better take them seriously! And base all of our national policies upon what they say!

/get real

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
USAFHokie80
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2008 01:53 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
hamburger wrote:
i don't know what it is like stateside , but in canada students are SCRAMBLING to get into medical school !
for every place in the medical faculties of our universities there are several qualified applicants .
some students attend medical schools in ireland and other countries to be able to practice medicine in canada .

we know quite a number of physicians - some are our neighbours - and while most of them don't live in million dollar mansions , they seem to live quite well .

if one wants to become a millionaire quickly , there are certainly other professions that make that possible . the physicians we know seem to want to be physicians first , rather than millionaires - which doesn't mean that we don't have any well-to-do physicians .
hbg


But, how is this possible? According to Hokie, all those physicians must be trying as hard as they can to leave your system, including emigrating to other countries.

Cycloptichorn


While the snide comments are amusing, you are exaggerating what I said. This has nothing to do with Canada - regardless of their health care system. We are talking about the US. And you are expecting to fundamentally alter the entire system which many, many people rely on for their well-being, and expect them to be ok with that. You are either stupid or crazy if you think physicians will let that pass without great opposition.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2008 01:56 pm
San Francisco has universal health care.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1207599,00.html
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2008 02:06 pm
USAFHokie80 wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
hamburger wrote:
i don't know what it is like stateside , but in canada students are SCRAMBLING to get into medical school !
for every place in the medical faculties of our universities there are several qualified applicants .
some students attend medical schools in ireland and other countries to be able to practice medicine in canada .

we know quite a number of physicians - some are our neighbours - and while most of them don't live in million dollar mansions , they seem to live quite well .

if one wants to become a millionaire quickly , there are certainly other professions that make that possible . the physicians we know seem to want to be physicians first , rather than millionaires - which doesn't mean that we don't have any well-to-do physicians .
hbg


But, how is this possible? According to Hokie, all those physicians must be trying as hard as they can to leave your system, including emigrating to other countries.

Cycloptichorn


While the snide comments are amusing, you are exaggerating what I said. This has nothing to do with Canada - regardless of their health care system. We are talking about the US. And you are expecting to fundamentally alter the entire system which many, many people rely on for their well-being, and expect them to be ok with that. You are either stupid or crazy if you think physicians will let that pass without great opposition.


Yes, they will be okay with that, and yes, I do propose a change from a broken system which does not work, to one which does work - and many other countries do just fine with. And it isn't as if they will have much of a choice; Universal health care of one form or another polls extremely well, and they will be unable to stop change from happening.

Some may not be okay with that, and they are free to leave. I think the number who choose to do so will be very small. We have made changes to our society in the past, and our country did not collapse then; it will not do so now.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
USAFHokie80
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2008 02:22 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:


Did you read the same article I did? It clearly states that SF's universal healthplan "is not a slamdunk" and must first be voted on before it takes effect. And even then, we have no idea how effective it will be.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2008 02:25 pm
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/10/us/10health.html
0 Replies
 
USAFHokie80
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2008 02:33 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
USAFHokie80 wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
hamburger wrote:
i don't know what it is like stateside , but in canada students are SCRAMBLING to get into medical school !
for every place in the medical faculties of our universities there are several qualified applicants .
some students attend medical schools in ireland and other countries to be able to practice medicine in canada .

we know quite a number of physicians - some are our neighbours - and while most of them don't live in million dollar mansions , they seem to live quite well .

if one wants to become a millionaire quickly , there are certainly other professions that make that possible . the physicians we know seem to want to be physicians first , rather than millionaires - which doesn't mean that we don't have any well-to-do physicians .
hbg


But, how is this possible? According to Hokie, all those physicians must be trying as hard as they can to leave your system, including emigrating to other countries.

Cycloptichorn


While the snide comments are amusing, you are exaggerating what I said. This has nothing to do with Canada - regardless of their health care system. We are talking about the US. And you are expecting to fundamentally alter the entire system which many, many people rely on for their well-being, and expect them to be ok with that. You are either stupid or crazy if you think physicians will let that pass without great opposition.


Yes, they will be okay with that, and yes, I do propose a change from a broken system which does not work, to one which does work - and many other countries do just fine with. And it isn't as if they will have much of a choice; Universal health care of one form or another polls extremely well, and they will be unable to stop change from happening.

Some may not be okay with that, and they are free to leave. I think the number who choose to do so will be very small. We have made changes to our society in the past, and our country did not collapse then; it will not do so now.

Cycloptichorn


Wow. You want to just up and change the livelihood of hundreds of thousands of people because you *think* - and really have no idea - that your ideas are better. So what if it polls well??? George Bush polled well too, was elected twice... and has been the worst president the country has seen in 200 years. Since when does the common person really know what is best? You have a bunch of people that want this because they have ZERO knowledge of the system and the hurdles. They only know hat they want - and much like you - don't care how they get it.

I think that you don't actually know what you are arguing for. I'm not opposed to a better system whatsoever - but I also know it's not nearly as simple as you propose. I think the general ideas of this plan would bring ruin to the health care system. If a system could be devised that would provide a *BASIC* care for people and not burden hospital system more than they already are - so be it. The problem I see is that there are a lot of people spurting out all sorts of ideas with no understanding about the infrastructure and how things work. In all honesty, I think Ron Paul would have been the best choice to implement such a system being that he IS a physician.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2008 02:50 pm
Doctors and nurses are special interests, Hokie, so they don't know anything, according to Democrats. Likewise, oil companies know nothing about oil, they only care about getting rich. They are all evil because they make a profit, that according to cyclops.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2008 02:53 pm
Quote:
Since when does the common person really know what is best?


Well, that is how we run our country after all. Unless you are proposing that we change that system, you'd better get ready for some form of Universal Health care, as that is what the people seem to want.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2008 03:05 pm
Majority of people also seem to oppose homosexual marriage, but I don't think we should really let the people that matter, right? I mean unless we want the system to work as intended.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2008 03:07 pm
McGentrix wrote:
Majority of people also seem to oppose homosexual marriage, but I don't think we should really let the people that matter, right? I mean unless we want the system to work as intended.


If the country wishes to pass a Constitutional ban on gay marriage, I suggest those politicians who are interested in getting ahead ought to attempt to do so. I rather doubt they will be successful.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2008 03:08 pm
I think the majority of people couldn't give two shits about gay marriage either way.
0 Replies
 
USAFHokie80
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2008 04:07 pm
... GWB rode gay marriage into the white house.... obviously people do care.

that's really beside the point though. just because people want something, doesn't mean it is in their best interest. children would eat candy and drink soda all day. they would not go to school if they could. is that good for them ?

seriously, i wish there were a way to change the system. the opinion of a million idiots should not overshadow the opinion of a few scholars.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2008 04:42 pm
hokie wrote :

Quote:
You are either stupid or crazy if you think physicians will let that pass without great opposition.


here , physicians also put up quite a fight against "socialized" healthcare - they actually went on strike !!!.
they must have had a rather militant union .


won't bore you with many details - they can be found at the link .

just the esssential part :
Quote:
Medicare
Douglas's (socialist premier of Saskatchewan and a fire-brand baptist preacher) number one concern was the creation of Medicare. In the summer of 1962, Saskatchewan became the centre of a hard-fought struggle between the provincial government, the North American medical establishment, and the province's physicians, who brought things to a halt with the 1962 Saskatchewan Doctors' Strike. The doctors believed their best interests were not being met and feared a significant loss of income as well as government interference in medical care decisions even though Douglas agreed that his government would pay the going rate for service that doctors charged. The medical establishment claimed that Douglas would import foreign doctors to make his plan work and used racist images to try to scare the public.[citation needed] Their defenders have also argued that private or government medical insurance plans covered 60 to 63 per cent of the Saskatchewan population before Medicare legislation was introduced.[citation needed]

An often forgotten political fact is that though Douglas is widely hailed as the father of Medicare, he had retired from his position as Saskatchewan's premier, turned over this job in 1961 to Woodrow Lloyd and took the leadership of the federal New Democratic Party.

The Saskatchewan program was finally launched by his successor, Woodrow Lloyd, in 1962. The success of the province's public health care program was not lost on the federal government. Another Saskatchewan politician, newly elected Prime Minister John Diefenbaker ( A CONSERVATIVE


article in full :
"SOCIALIZED" HEALTHCARE

and the rest is history !
0 Replies
 
USAFHokie80
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jun, 2008 08:42 am
People have mentioned the healthcare plan in Mass before on here as a template for how this can be done nationally... So I thought I would post a link to an article in USAToday about the rising cost of the system - which may be its undoing.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2008-06-29-massreform_N.htm
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jun, 2008 09:26 am
Facts about health care cost increases in the US:

http://www.nchc.org/facts/cost.shtml
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jun, 2008 11:24 am
c. i's. article raises some interesting points .
in our community (ontario/canada) the hospital administrator of a major university teaching hospital was fired last week by the ontario ministry of health .
the reason given : "he was putting too much emphasis on patient care and not enough on cost control " .
this has raised quite a bit of controversy both in the local community and province-wide .
sure , we do want our health-care run efficiently but we also want effective health-care .
there have now been letters to the editor questioning whether we are putting enough money (taxes and premiums) into health-care .
people are beginning to say , if we do not put sufficient money into health-care , we'll suffer the consequences - both as individuals and as a nation .

we all like to pay as little taxes as possible and buy all the goods and services we desire , but what good is that going to do us if we cannot get the health-care we need when we are sick ?
a new and larger car , a bigger house , a more expensive vacation ... ... are not going to do as any good if we cannot get the healthcare to enjoy these things .
so we need to have a look at our priorities . what are the most important needs for individuals and the nation , both in the short-term and the long-term ?
is it the new care or good health-care ? for me and many others the choice is quite clear : " HEALTH-CARE !
however there are plenty of others who think the toothfairy will take care of them eventually : NO SUCH LUCK ! pay or suffer the consequences !

i think there is a big job for both politicians of all parties and the medical professionals to come together and lay out for the population the true cost of adequate health-care for all citizens .
we can ill afford to ignore the questions and we must find the answers - for the individuals and for the nation as a whole .
ignoring the problems now (what many politicians probably would like to do) , will only result in bigger , more costly problems down the road .
hbg
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jun, 2008 11:30 am
hbg, Most have not learned that simple lesson; without good health, everything else means little to nothing.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 05/06/2024 at 07:02:12