2 weeks ago, I thought the issue was that he lied about the Nuclear weapons program, Last week he lied about the WMD's in general, now it's that he lied aboutthe immediacy?
Let me know when you finally decide on which lie is the correct one as it is too time consuming fighting each one. You will never be saved if you keep changing what the lies are.
Frank's right - it's all of that.
Nukes: Iraqis were busy trying to make them until 91, we knew that; no evidence whatsoever that they did anything about it since that time, though. No evidence now, still, either. None. The lie, until anything does come up, then: that we had to go to war to prevent Saddams regime from having nukes.
WMD: Iraq had them, we knew that - were forced to destroy over 80% of them in the time until 1998, as US authorities back then proudly proclaimed; part of the remainder remains undocumented. Did they still have it, or not? The UN said: we dont know, we gotta keep inspections up to find out. The US said: we know
- they still got 'em - we need to go to war about it, right now. Lie.
Immediacy: see two items above.