blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 01:30 pm
sofia

Of course whether Coulter wears a miniskirt is completely irrelevant to anything of any importance at all. My initiation of this element, with all the negative connotations I added to it, was intended exactly to underline how intellectually repugnant her style of discourse is, because I did precisely what she does.

Setanta

You don't know anything about this person!? And you have been arguing with me about whether present discourse is or is not at a bad spot? Shame on you, you son of an Irishman.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 01:33 pm
blatham, Sorry for imitating your post, but "son of an Irishwoman" came immediately to mind after reading your post. LOL c.i.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 01:36 pm
ci

I was attempting sensitivity. Many people of Irish descent were never fortunate enough to become acquainted with their real biological fathers, and thus I was just giving Set a comforting little pat on the back in case he might be in the majority on this one (as opposed to pretty much everything else).
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 01:39 pm
BL--I know who the critter is, Boss, i know nothing of her, and have no desire to read what she writes . . . nor have i any desire to read what the majority of left-wingnuts write . . . there is precious little time to read what was thoughtfully composed with insight and evidence to care to waste any of that time reading the rant-from-time-immemorial . . . the provenance of which can be found among right-wingnuts as well as left- . . .
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 01:47 pm
Set

You keep pointing in the direction of deep left field... are you pulling a Babe Ruth or is there some other notion on your mind?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 01:48 pm
Lost me entirely there, Boss . . . here, let me pull off an' see if i can find a pay phone . . .
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 01:52 pm
This all boils down to if Dubya could write a speech, a book or anything past his off-the-cuff platitudinous gibberish, everyone would be totally amazed. Most prominant figures have an editor working closely beside them as few of them are accomplished writers in the own right. There's too much of a tone of sour grapes in the disliking of Hillary and practically anything she does. I find all politicians somewhat of a joke but that's me. As to the adulation heaped upon George Bush, it will never reach the peak of the misdirected adulation of Ronald Reagan.
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 01:52 pm
sofia

Of course whether Coulter wears a miniskirt is completely irrelevant to anything of any importance at all. My initiation of this element, with all the negative connotations I added to it, was intended exactly to underline how intellectually repugnant her style of discourse is, because I did precisely what she does.
-----------------
Yes. I've noticed the similarities.
It's hard for one to maintain that superior affect toward Coulter, when they do 'precisely what she does'.

Just responding on a boring Saturday afternoon. You, of course, may say what you please. I just think the logic is goofy. Seems the Coulter hair, skirt length and appearance debaters lost their moral high ground.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 02:12 pm
I have never commented on her hair, attire, general appearance or her intellect. and I repeat No Comment.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 02:54 pm
Well, i did comment that i thought her nothing special, which while not positive ain't eggsacktly negative either . . . i know nothing of her, to repeat myself, and have no opinion of her other than that i've heard her described as ranting too often to wish to investigate. In the same manner, i don't go read links people put up when i recognzie the URL as a spot where one reads liberal rant . . . i get all the rant i need (my own included) right here in our comfy little electronic home . . .
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 03:33 pm
Yes, S, the rant is awfully high right here on A2K.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 03:39 pm
Actually I wouldn't want to be in bed with Hillary or Ann...Hillary, although I admire her, is just not that attractive to me and Ann...well I have a rule......If a woman has a dick in her nightstand with a harness that's bigger than mine I have to take a pass......
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 03:48 pm
Laughing
I think we can say what we please about any of these people--I was just sidling up to a minor point about criticising her (Ann), while taking a chunk out of her playbook.

For the record, she's pissed me off on a few occasions.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 03:49 pm
Git her, darlin', you don't hafta take that kinda crap . . .
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 03:57 pm
Bill Maher has her on his HBO I believe to pull off some one-upsmanship by patronizing her -- if he's actually dated her or, ugly thought, slept with her...actually, I guess one could say schlept with her. Actually, I think Rush Limbaugh write her stuff for her while putting his nose in her business (she's tall...)
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 04:25 pm
Bet they did it. Shocked

A nose-holder for all involved. (Several volunteers for helping hold Maher's schnoz.)

Love this toney discussion!
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2003 05:55 pm
It sounds like both of them -- stopping a nothing including creating another myth about strange bedfellows. She probably screamed out "Oh, George, George" at the climax, however.
0 Replies
 
williamhenry3
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Jun, 2003 12:09 am
Is one to suppose that Maher, Coulter and Limbaugh are into menage a trois?

What a repulsive sound and fury that would be.

Now, we are way off topic here, and it's a wonder that this forum hasn't been locked by the management several posts back.

So, in the hopes of bringing something new to this discussion of three sexually active adults, I have called in liberal, dowdy, Maureen Dowd to help bring the forum back to a better sense of decorum:

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/29/books/review/29DOWDOT.html?
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Jun, 2003 07:09 am
OH, wh, you just had to break in and squelch our fun.

Maureen's review is likely a fair one -- I don't really cotton to memoirs by politicians as all of them ring phony. Probably worse is a biographer's assessment of a political personality which ultimately bathes them in that golden light Hillary speaks of for her White House interview or trashes them, shamelessly accentuating their feet of clay. Politicians are adulated as living icons or vilified as dead meat. Deserving or not, it all ends up as a lot of cheap shots or praying at their feet. Anyone here want to kiss Dubya's feet?
0 Replies
 
williamhenry3
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Jun, 2003 11:31 am
Lightwizard<

I, for one, am not into feet-kissing, but whatever turns you on in private is what the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last week. Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 07:02:20